Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 20:24 UTC

LadybugDB / ladybug

LadybugDB a graph database

C++ · CypherMIT★ 1,710 stars⑂ 134 forkssince Oct 2025View on GitHub ↗

#database #graph #cypher #cypher-query-language #code-knowledge-base #code-knowledge-graph #knowledge-graph

LadybugDB/ladybug holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Security (63/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LadybugDBOrganization

56 followers38 public repossince Oct 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	ladybug	0.20.2	362,021	43	3 days ago	graph database

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

99Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
35.3/36	Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 1,170 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	1,170
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	51

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 25 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~10.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	25
latest_release_tag	v0.20.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	3
mean_days_between_releases	10.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

78Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

76Good

How it's scored

52.4/60	Stars — 1,710 stars
17.7/25	Forks — 134 forks
5.6/15	Watchers — 11 watchers

Inputs used

forks	134
stars	1,710
watchers	11
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

93Exceptional

How it's scored

74.1/80	Monthly downloads — 362,021 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	ladybug
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	362,021
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

78Good

How it's scored

36/54	Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 20% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 86 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 20 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	3
contributors_sampled	86
top_contributor_share	0.199

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good

How it's scored

31.3/42	Issue resolution — 74% of issues closed
26.5/30	PR acceptance — 474/537 decided PRs merged
10.4/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 4/5 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
3/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

merged_prs	474
open_issues	83
closed_issues	243
prs_merged_7d	25
prs_decided_7d	27
prs_merged_30d	56
prs_decided_30d	60
issue_closed_ratio	0.745
closed_unmerged_prs	63
first_time_authors_30d	4
first_time_prs_merged_30d	4
first_time_prs_decided_30d	5

Ownership & stewardship

56Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
12.6/25	Owner reach — 56 followers of LadybugDB
13.4/25	Track record — 38 public repos, account ~0 yr old

Inputs used

followers	56
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	LadybugDB
public_repos	38
account_age_days	333

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20	Version history — 43 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	ladybug
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 20 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://ladybugdb.com/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	database, graph, cypher, cypher-query-language, code-knowledge-base, code-knowledge-graph, knowledge-graph
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://ladybugdb.com/
docs_site	https://ladybugdb.com/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

54Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 20 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
3.5/5	SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	18
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	0
scorecard_aggregate	5.4

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	69
affected_packages	12
assessed_packages	181
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 3, moderate 5, low 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 181 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://ladybugdb.com/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 77 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://ladybugdb.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.77
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	2,660

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

62Moderate

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile, third_party/ports/lz4/Makefile, third_party/ports/mbedtls/Makefile, third_party/ports/roaring_bitmap/Makefile, third_party/ports/spdlog/Makefile, third_party/ports/zstd/Makefile, tools/shell/test/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — C++ (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	—
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile, third_party/ports/lz4/Makefile, third_party/ports/mbedtls/Makefile, third_party/ports/roaring_bitmap/Makefile, third_party/ports/spdlog/Makefile, third_party/ports/zstd/Makefile, tools/shell/test/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — C++ (statically typed)
54.8/55	Manageable file sizes — 7/1,866 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	C++
largest_source_bytes	129,579
source_files_sampled	1,866
oversized_source_files	7

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — example, examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	example, examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,710GitHub stars

86contributors

1,170commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

25releases

3bus factor

83open issues

—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 134 ⇿

0Stars

134Forks

25Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 9Patch 15

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10

5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 20:24 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2	Code-Review	Found 3/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10	Contributors	project has 20 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
1	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
7	SAST	SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8	Vulnerabilities	2 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 181

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 181 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	ahash	`0.8.12`	indirect
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	android_system_properties	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.99`	indirect
crates.io	arrayvec	`0.7.6`	indirect
crates.io	arrow	`55.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-arith	`55.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-array	`55.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-buffer	`55.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-cast	`55.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-data	`55.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-ord	`55.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-row	`55.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-schema	`55.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-select	`55.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	arrow-string	`55.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	atoi	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	base64	`0.22.1`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.9.4`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.19.0`	indirect
crates.io	bytes	`1.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.2.36`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	chrono	`0.4.42`	indirect
crates.io	clap	`4.5.47`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.5.47`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`0.7.5`	indirect
crates.io	cmake	`0.1.54`	indirect
crates.io	codespan-reporting	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	const-random	`0.1.18`	indirect
crates.io	const-random-macro	`0.1.16`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation-sys	`0.8.7`	indirect
crates.io	crunchy	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	cxx	`1.0.138`	indirect
crates.io	cxx-build	`1.0.138`	indirect
crates.io	cxxbridge-cmd	`1.0.138`	indirect
crates.io	cxxbridge-flags	`1.0.138`	indirect
crates.io	cxxbridge-macro	`1.0.138`	indirect
crates.io	deranged	`0.5.3`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.13`	indirect
crates.io	fastrand	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	foldhash	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.16`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	half	`2.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.15.5`	indirect
crates.io	iana-time-zone	`0.1.63`	indirect
crates.io	iana-time-zone-haiku	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3.78`	indirect
crates.io	lexical-core	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	lexical-parse-float	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	lexical-parse-integer	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	lexical-util	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	lexical-write-float	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	lexical-write-integer	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.175`	indirect
crates.io	libm	`0.2.15`	indirect
crates.io	link-cplusplus	`1.0.12`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.9.4`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.28`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.7.5`	indirect
crates.io	num	`0.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	num-bigint	`0.4.6`	indirect
crates.io	num-complex	`0.4.6`	indirect
crates.io	num-conv	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	num-integer	`0.1.46`	indirect
crates.io	num-iter	`0.1.45`	indirect
crates.io	num-rational	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.3`	indirect
crates.io	powerfmt	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.101`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.40`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`5.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.11.2`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.10`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.6`	indirect
crates.io	rust_decimal	`1.37.2`	indirect
crates.io	rust_decimal_macros	`1.37.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`1.0.8`	indirect
crates.io	rustversion	`1.0.22`	indirect
crates.io	ryu	`1.0.20`	indirect
crates.io	scratch	`1.0.9`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`1.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	static_assertions	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	tempfile	`3.21.0`	indirect
crates.io	termcolor	`1.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	time	`0.3.47`	indirect
crates.io	time-core	`0.1.8`	indirect
crates.io	time-macros	`0.2.27`	indirect
crates.io	tiny-keccak	`2.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-width	`0.1.14`	indirect
crates.io	uuid	`1.18.1`	indirect
crates.io	version_check	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.14.4+wasi-0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.101`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-backend	`0.2.101`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro	`0.2.101`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro-support	`0.2.101`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-shared	`0.2.101`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-util	`0.1.11`	indirect
crates.io	windows-core	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-implement	`0.60.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-interface	`0.59.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-result	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	windows-strings	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.60.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.53.3`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.45.1`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy	`0.8.27`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy-derive	`0.8.27`	indirect
PyPI	aiohappyeyeballs	`2.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.13.3`	indirect
PyPI	aiosignal	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`25.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.24.3`	indirect
PyPI	frozenlist	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	fsspec	`2026.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.11`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	mpmath	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`1.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	networkx	`3.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	numpy	`2.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.0`	indirect
PyPI	pandas	`2.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	polars	`1.38.1`	indirect
PyPI	polars-runtime-32	`1.38.1`	indirect
PyPI	propcache	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	psutil	`7.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyarrow	`20.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	pybind11	`2.13.6`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.19.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyparsing	`3.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	pytz	`2025.2`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.32.5`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.11.12`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`80.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	sympy	`1.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	torch	`2.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	torch	`2.10.0+cpu`	indirect
PyPI	torch-geometric	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	tqdm	`4.67.3`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2025.3`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	xxhash	`3.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`1.22.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 181 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
aiohttp	`3.13.3`	indirect	critical	48	`3.14.3`
pyarrow	`20.0.0`	indirect	high	2	`23.0.1`
torch	`2.10.0`	indirect	high	2	`2.13.0`
urllib3	`2.6.3`	indirect	high	4	`2.7.0`
idna	`3.11`	indirect	moderate	2	`3.15`
pytest	`9.0.2`	indirect	moderate	2	`9.0.3`
requests	`2.32.5`	indirect	moderate	2	`2.33.0`
setuptools	`80.10.2`	indirect	moderate	2	`83.0.0`
torch	`2.10.0+cpu`	indirect	moderate	1	`2.13.0`
pygments	`2.19.2`	indirect	low	2	`2.20.0`
anyhow	`1.0.99`	indirect	unknown	1	`1.0.103`
cxx	`1.0.138`	indirect	unknown	1	`1.0.195`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records