Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 06:47 UTC

Shazwazza / Smidge

A lightweight runtime CSS/JavaScript file minification, combination, compression & management library for ASP.Net Core

C#MIT★ 374 stars⑂ 48 forkssince Dec 2014View on GitHub ↗
#minification#compression#javascript#asp-net-core#css#hactoberfest

Shazwazza/Smidge holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (75/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (42/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Shannon DeminickPersonal account
437 followers81 public repossince May 2012Microsoft

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

61Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

60Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
11.9/18Commit volume — 20 commits in the last year
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
commits_last_year20
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year6

Release discipline

62Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 36 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 297 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~140.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count36
latest_release_tagv4.6.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release297
mean_days_between_releases140.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

62Moderate
How it's scored
41.7/60Stars — 374 stars
13.9/25Forks — 48 forks
6.5/15Watchers — 16 watchers
Inputs used
forks48
stars374
watchers16
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 87% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 18 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled18
top_contributor_share0.866

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good
How it's scored
34.6/42Issue resolution — 82% of issues closed
27.4/30PR acceptance — 53/58 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs53
open_issues29
closed_issues136
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.824
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

68Good
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
19/25Owner reach — 437 followers of Shazwazza
25/25Track record — 81 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers437
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginShazwazza
public_repos81
account_age_days5,178
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

75Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsminification, compression, javascript, asp-net-core, css, hactoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

51Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
6/7.5Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
1.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 3
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 31 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

52Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 2/159 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes293,876
source_files_sampled159
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

374GitHub stars
18contributors
20commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
36releases
1bus factor
29open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 06:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
7CI-Tests7 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
8Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 3
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities31 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsminima~> 2.5docs/Gemfile
RubyGemsgithub-pages~> 201docs/Gemfile
RubyGemsjekyll-feed~> 0.11docs/Gemfile
RubyGemstzinfo~> 1.2docs/Gemfile
RubyGemstzinfo-data—docs/Gemfile
RubyGemswdm~> 0.1.1docs/Gemfile
All dependencies 104

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 98 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsgithub-pages201direct
RubyGemsjekyll-feed0.11.0direct
RubyGemsminima2.5.0direct
RubyGemstzinfo1.2.10direct
RubyGemstzinfo-data1.2022.6direct
RubyGemswdm0.1.1direct
npmuglify-js^3.19.3indirect
NuGetDazinator.Extensions.FileProviders2.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.FileProviders.Composite10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1indirect
NuGetMoq4.20.72indirect
NuGetNUglify1.22.0indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport4.2.11.1indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script2.4.1indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script-source1.11.1indirect
RubyGemscolorator1.1.0indirect
RubyGemscommonmarker0.17.13indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.7indirect
RubyGemsdnsruby1.61.9indirect
RubyGemsem-websocket0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsethon0.12.0indirect
RubyGemseventmachine1.2.7indirect
RubyGemsexecjs2.8.1indirect
RubyGemsfaraday2.7.1indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http3.0.2indirect
RubyGemsffi1.11.1indirect
RubyGemsforwardable-extended2.6.0indirect
RubyGemsgemoji3.0.1indirect
RubyGemsgithub-pages-health-check1.16.1indirect
RubyGemshtml-pipeline2.14.3indirect
RubyGemshttp_parser.rb0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsi18n0.9.5indirect
RubyGemsjekyll3.8.5indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-avatar0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-coffeescript1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-commonmark1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-commonmark-ghpages0.1.6indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-default-layout0.1.4indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-gist1.5.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-github-metadata2.12.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-mentions1.4.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-optional-front-matter0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-paginate1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-readme-index0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-redirect-from0.14.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-relative-links0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-remote-theme0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-sass-converter1.5.2indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-seo-tag2.5.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-sitemap1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-swiss0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-architect0.1.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-cayman0.1.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-dinky0.1.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-hacker0.1.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-leap-day0.1.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-merlot0.1.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-midnight0.1.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-minimal0.1.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-modernist0.1.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-primer0.5.3indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-slate0.1.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-tactile0.1.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-time-machine0.1.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-titles-from-headings0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-watch2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsjemoji0.10.2indirect
RubyGemskramdown1.17.0indirect
RubyGemsliquid4.0.0indirect
RubyGemslisten3.1.5indirect
RubyGemsmercenary0.3.6indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.6indirect
RubyGemsminitest5.16.3indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.15.6indirect
RubyGemsoctokit4.25.1indirect
RubyGemspathutil0.16.2indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsracc1.7.3indirect
RubyGemsrb-fsevent0.10.3indirect
RubyGemsrb-inotify0.10.0indirect
RubyGemsrouge3.11.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-enum0.9.0indirect
RubyGemsruby2_keywords0.0.5indirect
RubyGemsruby_dep1.5.0indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip2.3.2indirect
RubyGemssafe_yaml1.0.5indirect
RubyGemssass3.7.4indirect
RubyGemssass-listen4.0.0indirect
RubyGemssawyer0.9.2indirect
RubyGemssimpleidn0.2.1indirect
RubyGemsterminal-table1.8.0indirect
RubyGemsthread_safe0.3.6indirect
RubyGemstyphoeus1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsunf0.1.4indirect
RubyGemsunf_ext0.0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width1.6.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Shazwazza/Smidge. Read them side by side →

100carbon-design-system/carbonA design system built by IBMExceptional99electron/electron:electron: Build cross-platform desktop apps with JavaScript, HTML, and CSSExceptional98apache/foryA blazingly fast multi-language serialization framework for idiomatic domain objects, schema IDL, and cross-language data exchange.Exceptional98prettier/prettierPrettier is an opinionated code formatter.Exceptional97biomejs/biomeA toolchain for web projects, aimed to provide functionalities to maintain them. Biome offers formatter and linter, usable via CLI and LSP.Exceptional96surveyjs/survey-libraryOpen-source JavaScript form library for React, Angular, Vue, and plain JavaScript. Render dynamic JSON-driven forms, multi-step form wizards, surveys, quizzes, and other data-entry tools.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.