Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 13:00 UTC

Spomky-Labs / otphp

:closed_lock_with_key: A PHP library for generating one time passwords according to RFC 4226 (HOTP) and the RFC 6238 (TOTP)

PHPMIT★ 1,477 stars⑂ 159 forkssince Oct 2013View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#otp#totp#hotp#php#rfc-4226#rfc-6238#rfc4226#rfc6238

Spomky-Labs/otphp holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (87/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (33/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Spomky-LabsOrganization
46 followers37 public repossince Feb 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistspomky-labs/otphp11.5.01,418,6466239 days agogoogle-authenticatorotphotptotprfc-6238rfc-4226freeotp

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

66Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
14.8/18Commit volume — 43 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year43
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year7

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 53 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 39 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~87 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count53
latest_release_tag11.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release39
mean_days_between_releases87
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

87Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

78Good
How it's scored
51.4/60Stars — 1,477 stars
18.3/25Forks — 159 forks
8.7/15Watchers — 38 watchers
Inputs used
forks159
stars1,477
watchers38
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

94Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 1,418,646 downloads/month across packagist
13.9/20Registry dependents — 122 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesspomky-labs/otphp
dependents122
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads51,002,560
monthly_downloads1,418,646
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

38Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 74% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 27 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled27
top_contributor_share0.743

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
24.6/30PR acceptance — 167/204 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs167
open_issues0
closed_issues79
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs37
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

82Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
12/25Owner reach — 46 followers of Spomky-Labs
23.5/25Track record — 37 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers46
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginSpomky-Labs
public_repos37
account_age_days4,528
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 39 days ago
20/20Version history — 62 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesspomky-labs/otphp
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish39

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

83Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

88Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsotp, totp, hotp, php, rfc-4226, rfc-6238, rfc4226, rfc6238
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

69Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

33At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

48Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/24 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes24,408
source_files_sampled24
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,477GitHub stars
27contributors
43commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
53releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10
6.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-16 13:00 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests22 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 2/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistparagonie/constant_time_encoding^2.0 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/clock^1.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts^3.2composer.json
All dependencies 41

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 40 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistparagonie/constant_time_encoding2.2.2direct
Packagistbeberlei/assert2.9.6indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.1.0indirect
Packagistguzzle/guzzle3.9.3indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.8.1indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest1.0.1indirect
Packagistphar-io/version1.0.1indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common1.0.1indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock4.3.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver0.4.0indirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecy1.8.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage5.3.2indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator1.4.5indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template1.2.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer1.0.9indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-token-stream2.0.2indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit6.5.13indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit-mock-objects5.0.10indirect
Packagistpsr/log1.0.2indirect
Packagistsatooshi/php-coveralls1.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator2.1.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff2.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment3.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter3.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state2.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector1.1.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations1.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version2.0.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/config4.1.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/console4.1.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher2.8.46indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem4.1.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.9.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.9.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch4.1.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml4.1.6indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.1.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.3.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Spomky-Labs/otphp. Read them side by side →

87yeojz/otplibOne Time Password (OTP) / 2FA for Node.js and Browser - Supports HOTP, TOTP and Google AuthenticatorExcellent99taskforcesh/bullmqBullMQ - Message Queue and Batch processing for NodeJS, Python, .NET, Elixir, Rust and PHP based on Redis or PostgreSQLExceptional98Sylius/SyliusHeadless open-source eCommerce platform on top of PHP/Symfony/API PlatformExceptional98symfony/symfonyThe Symfony PHP frameworkExceptional98codeigniter4/CodeIgniter4Open Source PHP Framework (originally from EllisLab)Exceptional98api-platform/coreThe server component of API Platform: hypermedia and GraphQL APIs in minutesExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.