Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 11:44 UTC

a-r-j / ProteinWorkshop

Benchmarking framework for protein representation learning. Includes a large number of pre-training and downstream task datasets, models and training/task utilities. (ICLR 2024)

Python · Jupyter NotebookMIT★ 275 stars⑂ 22 forkssince May 2023View on GitHub ↗

a-r-j/ProteinWorkshop holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Vitality (25/100). It was last updated 443 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Arian JamasbPersonal account
238 followers34 public repossince Nov 2016University of Cambridge

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIproteinworkshop0.2.5-7928 days agoproteinsdeep-learningdatasetsbenchmarks

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

25At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 443 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push443
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases6 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 928 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~24.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tagv0.2.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release928
mean_days_between_releases24.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
39.5/60Stars275 stars
11/25Forks22 forks
3.9/15Watchers6 watchers
Inputs used
forks22
stars275
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 34% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth10 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.339
How it's scored
32.7/42Issue resolution78% of issues closed
26.4/30PR acceptance67/76 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 9/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs67
open_issues6
closed_issues21
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.778
closed_unmerged_prs9
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
17.1/25Owner reach238 followers of a-r-j
23.2/25Track record34 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers238
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logina-r-j
public_repos34
account_age_days3,520
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
4/35Publish recencylatest publish 928 days ago
20/20Version history7 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesproteinworkshop
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish928

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://proteins.sh/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbenchmark, dataset, deep-learning, lightning, pretraining, protein, protein-structure, pytorch
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://proteins.sh/
docs_sitehttps://proteins.sh/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

39Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-ReviewFound 9/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities161 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapdocs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespoetry.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePython without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/130 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes42,094
source_files_sampled130
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesnotebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsnotebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

275GitHub stars
10contributors
0commits, last 12 months
443days since last push
6releases
2bus factor
6open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-15 11:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 9/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities161 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 32
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIgraphein^1.7.5pyproject.toml
PyPIloguru^0.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfair-esm^2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhydra-core^1.3.2pyproject.toml
PyPIbiotite^0.37.0pyproject.toml
PyPIe3nn^0.5.1pyproject.toml
PyPIeinops^0.6.1pyproject.toml
PyPIbeartype^0.15.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrich^13.5.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpytdc^0.4.1pyproject.toml
PyPIwandb^0.15.8pyproject.toml
PyPItorchmetrics^1.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlovely-tensors^0.1.15pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil^5.9.5pyproject.toml
PyPItqdm^4.66.1pyproject.toml
PyPIjaxtyping^0.2.24pyproject.toml
PyPIomegaconf^2.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpytorch-lightning^2.0.7pyproject.toml
PyPIlightning^2.0.7pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv^1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIwget^3.2pyproject.toml
PyPIopt-einsum^3.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPItorch^2.1.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpyrootutils^1.0.4pyproject.toml
PyPItorch-geometric^2.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhydra-colorlog^1.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfoldcomp^0.0.5pyproject.toml
PyPIcaptum^0.6.0pyproject.toml
PyPIumap-learn^0.5.4pyproject.toml
PyPImatplotlib^3.7.2pyproject.toml
PyPIdatashader^0.16.0pyproject.toml
PyPIholoviews^1.18.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 240

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 31 direct and 209 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIbeartype0.15.0direct
PyPIbiotite0.37.0direct
PyPIcaptum0.6.0direct
PyPIdatashader0.16.0direct
PyPIe3nn0.5.1direct
PyPIeinops0.6.1direct
PyPIfair-esm2.0.0direct
PyPIfoldcomp0.0.5direct
PyPIgraphein1.7.6direct
PyPIholoviews1.18.3direct
PyPIhydra-colorlog1.2.0direct
PyPIhydra-core1.3.2direct
PyPIjaxtyping0.2.28direct
PyPIlightning2.2.1direct
PyPIloguru0.7.2direct
PyPIlovely-tensors0.1.15direct
PyPImatplotlib3.8.3direct
PyPIomegaconf2.3.0direct
PyPIopt-einsum3.3.0direct
PyPIpsutil5.9.8direct
PyPIpyrootutils1.0.4direct
PyPIpytdc0.4.1direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.0.1direct
PyPIpytorch-lightning2.2.1direct
PyPIrich13.7.1direct
PyPItorch-geometric2.5.2direct
PyPItorchmetrics1.3.2direct
PyPItqdm4.66.2direct
PyPIumap-learn0.5.5direct
PyPIwandb0.15.12direct
PyPIwget3.2direct
PyPIaiohttp3.9.3indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.3.1indirect
PyPIalabaster0.7.16indirect
PyPIantlr4-python3-runtime4.9.3indirect
PyPIanyio4.3.0indirect
PyPIappdirs1.4.4indirect
PyPIasttokens2.4.1indirect
PyPIasync-timeout4.0.3indirect
PyPIattrs23.2.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.14.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.12.3indirect
PyPIbiopandas0.5.1.dev0indirect
PyPIbiopython1.83indirect
PyPIbioservices1.11.2indirect
PyPIblack23.12.1indirect
PyPIbleach6.1.0indirect
PyPIbokeh3.3.4indirect
PyPIcattrs23.2.3indirect
PyPIcertifi2024.2.2indirect
PyPIcffi1.16.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.4.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.3.2indirect
PyPIclick8.1.7indirect
PyPIcloudpickle3.0.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcolorcet3.1.0indirect
PyPIcolorlog6.8.2indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.2.0indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdask2024.3.1indirect
PyPIdataclasses0.6indirect
PyPIdecorator5.1.1indirect
PyPIdeepdiff6.7.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.3.8indirect
PyPIdocker-pycreds0.4.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.20.1indirect
PyPIeasydev0.13.1indirect
PyPIemoji2.11.0indirect
PyPIentrypoints0.4indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.2.0indirect
PyPIexecuting2.0.1indirect
PyPIfastcore1.5.29indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.19.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.13.3indirect
PyPIfonttools4.50.0indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.4.1indirect
PyPIfsspec2024.3.1indirect
PyPIfuro2023.9.10indirect
PyPIfuzzywuzzy0.18.0indirect
PyPIgevent24.2.1indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.11indirect
PyPIgitpython3.1.42indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.0.3indirect
PyPIgrequests0.7.0indirect
PyPIh110.14.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.4indirect
PyPIhttpx0.27.0indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub0.22.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.5.35indirect
PyPIidna3.6indirect
PyPIimagesize1.4.1indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata7.1.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources6.4.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.0.0indirect
PyPIipython8.18.1indirect
PyPIisort5.13.2indirect
PyPIjedi0.19.1indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.3indirect
PyPIjoblib1.3.2indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.21.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2023.12.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.6.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.7.2indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-pygments0.3.0indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.4.5indirect
PyPIlightning-utilities0.11.1indirect
PyPIline-profiler4.1.2indirect
PyPIlinkify-it-py2.0.3indirect
PyPIllvmlite0.42.0indirect
PyPIlocket1.0.0indirect
PyPIlooseversion1.1.2indirect
PyPIlovely-numpy0.2.11indirect
PyPIlxml5.1.0indirect
PyPIm2r20.3.3.post2indirect
PyPImarkdown3.6indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py3.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe2.1.5indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.1.6indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.4.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImistune0.8.4indirect
PyPImmtf-python1.1.3indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPImsgpack1.0.8indirect
PyPImultidict6.0.5indirect
PyPImultipledispatch1.0.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.0.0indirect
PyPInbclient0.10.0indirect
PyPInbconvert6.5.4indirect
PyPInbformat5.10.3indirect
PyPInbsphinx0.9.3indirect
PyPInbsphinx-link1.3.0indirect
PyPInbstripout0.6.2indirect
PyPInetworkx3.2.1indirect
PyPInodeenv1.8.0indirect
PyPInumba0.59.1indirect
PyPInumpy1.23.5indirect
PyPIopt-einsum-fx0.1.4indirect
PyPIordered-set4.1.0indirect
PyPIpackaging24.0indirect
PyPIpandas1.5.3indirect
PyPIpandoc2.3indirect
PyPIpandocfilters1.5.1indirect
PyPIpanel1.3.8indirect
PyPIparam2.1.0indirect
PyPIparso0.8.3indirect
PyPIpartd1.4.1indirect
PyPIpastel0.2.1indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIpathtools0.1.2indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpillow10.2.0indirect
PyPIpip24.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.2.0indirect
PyPIplotly5.20.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.4.0indirect
PyPIplumbum1.8.2indirect
PyPIply3.11indirect
PyPIpoethepoet0.22.1indirect
PyPIpre-commit3.7.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.43indirect
PyPIprotobuf4.25.3indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.2indirect
PyPIpycparser2.21indirect
PyPIpyct0.5.0indirect
PyPIpydantic1.10.14indirect
PyPIpydocstyle6.3.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.17.2indirect
PyPIpynndescent0.5.11indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.1.2indirect
PyPIpytest8.1.1indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpytz2024.1indirect
PyPIpyviz-comms3.0.2indirect
PyPIpywin32306indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.1indirect
PyPIpyzmq25.1.2indirect
PyPIrdkit-pypi2022.9.5indirect
PyPIreferencing0.34.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.31.0indirect
PyPIrequests-cache1.2.0indirect
PyPIrich-click1.7.4indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.18.0indirect
PyPIruff0.1.15indirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.4.1.post1indirect
PyPIscipy1.12.0indirect
PyPIseaborn0.13.2indirect
PyPIsentry-sdk1.43.0indirect
PyPIsetproctitle1.3.3indirect
PyPIsetuptools69.2.0indirect
PyPIsix1.16.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.1indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer2.2.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.5indirect
PyPIsphinx7.2.6indirect
PyPIsphinx-basic-ng1.0.0b2indirect
PyPIsphinx-codeautolink0.15.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton0.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-inline-tabs2023.4.21indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp1.0.8indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp1.0.6indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-gtagjs0.2.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.0.5indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp1.0.7indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml1.1.10indirect
PyPIsphinxext-opengraph0.8.2indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIsuds-community1.1.2indirect
PyPIsympy1.12indirect
PyPItenacity8.2.3indirect
PyPIthreadpoolctl3.4.0indirect
PyPItinycss21.2.1indirect
PyPItomli2.0.1indirect
PyPItoolz0.12.1indirect
PyPItornado6.4indirect
PyPItraitlets5.14.2indirect
PyPItypeguard2.13.3indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.5.0indirect
PyPIuc-micro-py1.0.3indirect
PyPIurl-normalize1.4.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.2.1indirect
PyPIvirtualenv20.25.1indirect
PyPIwatermark2.4.3indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.2.13indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwin32-setctime1.1.0indirect
PyPIwrapt1.16.0indirect
PyPIxarray2024.2.0indirect
PyPIxmltodict0.13.0indirect
PyPIxyzservices2023.10.1indirect
PyPIyarl1.9.4indirect
PyPIzipp3.18.1indirect
PyPIzope-event5.0indirect
PyPIzope-interface6.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.