Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 17:12 UTC

ansible / ansible-compat

A python package containing functions that help interacting with various versions of Ansible

PythonMIT★ 29 stars⑂ 38 forkssince Jun 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#ansible-devtools#hacktoberfest#pep-621

ansible/ansible-compat holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (65/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AnsibleOrganization · verified domain
3,744 followers304 public repossince Mar 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIansible-compat26.8.06,185,2447115 days agoansible

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

88Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
16.7/18Commit volume — 72 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year72
human_commit_share0.34
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year37

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 67 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 15 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~46.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count67
latest_release_tagv26.8.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release15
mean_days_between_releases46.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

42Weak
How it's scored
23.5/60Stars — 29 stars
13.1/25Forks — 38 forks
5.3/15Watchers — 10 watchers
Inputs used
forks38
stars29
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold

Community health

65Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, readthedocs.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 6,185,244 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesansible-compat
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads6,185,244
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

78Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

37Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 82% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 25 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 22 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled25
top_contributor_share0.816

Issue & PR responsiveness

89Excellent
How it's scored
40.5/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
26.6/30PR acceptance — 445/502 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 10/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs445
open_issues2
closed_issues54
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.964
closed_unmerged_prs57
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 3,744 followers of ansible
25/25Track record — 304 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers3,744
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginansible
public_repos304
account_age_days5,287

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 15 days ago
20/20Version history — 71 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesansible-compat
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish15

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — biome.json, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://ansible.readthedocs.io/projects/compat/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsansible-devtools, hacktoberfest, pep-621
has_wikino
homepagehttps://ansible.readthedocs.io/projects/compat/
docs_sitehttps://ansible.readthedocs.io/projects/compat/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

79Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

74Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 10/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages15
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:ansible-compat@26.8.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 15 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 34 of 34 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

84Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — biome.json, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint])
11/11Static type checking — src/ansible_compat/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 60 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesmise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/ansible_compat/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.6

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/ansible_compat/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/27 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes47,125
source_files_sampled27
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

29GitHub stars
25contributors
72commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
67releases
1bus factor
2open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-15: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 29 stars today.
  • pypi download statistics for 'ansible-compat' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • pypi download figures for ansible-compat carried forward from the previous scan (stats endpoint unavailable this scan)

More detail

Star and fork history 29 ★ / 38 ⇿
29Stars
38Forks
66Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-15. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

010203040293852021-062024-012026-07
Major 4Minor 21Patch 40

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.4 / 10
7.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 17:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 10/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIansible-core>=2.16.19,!=2.17.*pyproject.toml
PyPIjsonschema>=4.6.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpackaging>=22.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIsubprocess-tee>=0.4.1pyproject.toml
All dependencies 200

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 189 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIansible-core2.16.19direct
PyPIansible-core2.19.11direct
PyPIansible-core2.21.2direct
PyPIjsonschema4.21.1direct
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0direct
PyPIpackaging24.0direct
PyPIpackaging26.2direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.1direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIsubprocess-tee0.4.1direct
PyPIsubprocess-tee0.4.2direct
PyPIargparse-manpage4.5indirect
PyPIargparse-manpage4.7indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.6.0indirect
PyPIastroid4.0.4indirect
PyPIattrs23.2.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.14.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs7.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.12.3indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIblack24.3.0indirect
PyPIblack26.5.1indirect
PyPIbuild1.1.1indirect
PyPIbuild1.5.0indirect
PyPIcairocffi1.6.1indirect
PyPIcairocffi1.7.1indirect
PyPIcairosvg2.7.1indirect
PyPIcairosvg2.9.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2024.2.2indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi1.16.0indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.3.2indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIclick8.1.7indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.2indirect
PyPIcoverage7.4.4indirect
PyPIcryptography42.0.5indirect
PyPIcryptography49.0.0indirect
PyPIcsscompressor0.9.5indirect
PyPIcssselect20.7.0indirect
PyPIcssselect20.9.0indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdill0.4.1indirect
PyPIdnspython2.6.1indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.23indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.2.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgriffe0.42.1indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.1.0indirect
PyPIhjson3.1.0indirect
PyPIhtmlmin20.1.13indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIidna3.6indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIisort8.0.1indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.3indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsmin3.0.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2023.12.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.13.0indirect
PyPIlinkchecker10.4.0indirect
PyPIlinkchecker10.6.0indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.2indirect
PyPImarkdown3.5.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-exec1.12.3indirect
PyPImarkdown-exec1.8.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-include0.8.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe2.1.5indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.5.3indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-ansible24.2.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-ansible25.2.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-ansible26.4.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-autorefs1.0.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-autorefs1.4.4indirect
PyPImkdocs-gen-files0.5.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-gen-files0.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-htmlproofer-plugin1.2.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-htmlproofer-plugin1.5.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-macros-plugin1.5.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.5.15indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.6indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-minify-plugin0.8.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-monorepo-plugin1.1.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-monorepo-plugin1.1.2indirect
PyPImkdocstrings0.24.1indirect
PyPImkdocstrings1.0.6indirect
PyPImkdocstrings-python1.9.0indirect
PyPImkdocstrings-python2.0.5indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImypy2.3.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.0.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInh30.3.6indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.6indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpillow10.2.0indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIpip24.0indirect
PyPIpip26.2.1indirect
PyPIpip-tools7.4.1indirect
PyPIpipdeptree2.16.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.2.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.4.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIprek0.4.10indirect
PyPIproperdocs1.6.7indirect
PyPIpycparser2.21indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.17.2indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpylint4.0.6indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions10.7.1indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.1indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.0.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest8.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-instafail0.5.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.14.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpytest-plus0.6.1indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-slugify8.0.4indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag0.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer45.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.34.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2023.12.25indirect
PyPIrequests2.31.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIresolvelib1.0.1indirect
PyPIresolvelib1.2.1indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.18.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIruff0.15.22indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools69.2.0indirect
PyPIsix1.16.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.5indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.4indirect
PyPIsuper-collections0.6.2indirect
PyPItermcolor3.3.0indirect
PyPItext-unidecode1.3indirect
PyPItinycss21.2.1indirect
PyPItinycss21.5.1indirect
PyPItombi1.2.0indirect
PyPItomli2.0.1indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.0indirect
PyPItwine6.2.0indirect
PyPItypes-jsonschema4.26.0.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260518indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.10.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.2.1indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuv0.11.29indirect
PyPIwatchdog4.0.0indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwheel0.43.0indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:ansible-compat@26.8.0 pulls in 15 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ansible/ansible-compat. Read them side by side →

98ansible/ansible-lintansible-lint checks playbooks for practices and behavior that could potentially be improved and can fix some of the most common ones for youExceptional98ansible/moleculeAn ansible-native testing framework for collections, playbooks, and roles with configurable workflows for testing any system or serviceExceptional100psf/blackThe uncompromising Python code formatterExceptional99pyvista/pyvista3D visualization and mesh analysis for science and engineeringExceptional99go-gitea/giteaGit with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CDExceptional99wagtail/wagtailA Django content management system focused on flexibility and user experienceExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.