Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-04 01:01 UTC

bdperkin / gamesheet-sdk-py

Unofficial Python SDK and CLI for the GameSheet Inc. platform — automates WebUI procedures where a native API is absent.

PythonMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

bdperkin/gamesheet-sdk-py holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (89/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Brandon PerkinsPersonal account
1 follower34 public repossince Jan 2013Red Hat, Inc.

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIgamesheet-sdk-py0.4.122,468590 days agoautomationcligamesheethockeyscrapersdksports

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence — 11/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 339 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year339
human_commit_share0.66
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year11
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 85 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count85
latest_release_tagv0.4.12
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases1.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges33
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
45.2/80Monthly downloads — 2,468 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgamesheet-sdk-py
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads2,468
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
28.9/30PR acceptance — 176/183 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs176
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d8
prs_decided_7d8
prs_merged_30d26
prs_decided_30d26
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs7
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of bdperkin
23.2/25Track record — 34 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginbdperkin
public_repos34
account_age_days4,938
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 59 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgamesheet-sdk-py
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 23 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — tox.ini
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2/2.5CI-Tests — 12 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages150
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 150 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

89Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 64 of 66 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.97
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes33,007
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — tox.ini
11/11Static type checking — src/gamesheet_sdk/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 37 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 15 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/gamesheet_sdk/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.37
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.15
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/gamesheet_sdk/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/328 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes42,137
source_files_sampled328
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
339commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
85releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • deps.dev does not index pypi:gamesheet-sdk-py@0.4.12; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 01:01 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests12 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
9SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIclick==8.4.2pyproject.toml
PyPIcolorlog==6.12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIplaywright==1.62.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic==2.13.4pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings==2.14.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil==2.9.0.post0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml==6.0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests==2.34.2pyproject.toml
PyPIrich==15.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrich-click==1.9.8pyproject.toml
PyPItabulate==0.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPItzlocal==5.4.4pyproject.toml
PyPIurllib3==2.7.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 150

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 137 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIclick8.4.2direct
PyPIcolorlog6.12.0direct
PyPIplaywright1.62.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpydantic-settings2.14.2direct
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIrich15.0.0direct
PyPIrich-click1.9.8direct
PyPItabulate0.10.0direct
PyPItzlocal5.4.4direct
PyPIurllib32.7.0direct
PyPIabsolufy-imports0.3.1indirect
PyPIadd-trailing-comma4.0.0indirect
PyPIautoflake2.3.3indirect
PyPIautopep82.3.2indirect
PyPIbandit1.9.4indirect
PyPIblack26.5.1indirect
PyPIblacken-docs1.20.0indirect
PyPIblocklint0.3.0indirect
PyPIcodespell2.4.3indirect
PyPIdeptry0.25.1indirect
PyPIdocconvert2.2.0indirect
PyPIdocformatter1.7.8indirect
PyPIeditorconfig-checker3.8.0indirect
PyPIeradicate3.0.1indirect
PyPIfastapi0.141.1indirect
PyPIflake8-20201.8.1indirect
PyPIflake8-annotations3.2.0indirect
PyPIflake8-assertive2.2.0indirect
PyPIflake8-async27.7.1indirect
PyPIflake8-bandit4.1.1indirect
PyPIflake8-blind-except0.2.1indirect
PyPIflake8-boolean-trap1.0.1indirect
PyPIflake8-bugbear25.11.29indirect
PyPIflake8-builtins3.1.0indirect
PyPIflake8-commas4.0.0indirect
PyPIflake8-comprehensions3.17.0indirect
PyPIflake8-copyright0.2.4indirect
PyPIflake8-debugger4.1.2indirect
PyPIflake8-errmsg0.7.0indirect
PyPIflake8-executable2.1.3indirect
PyPIflake8-fixme1.1.1indirect
PyPIflake8-future-annotations1.1.0indirect
PyPIflake8-implicit-str-concat0.7.0indirect
PyPIflake8-import-conventions0.1.0indirect
PyPIflake8-logging1.8.0indirect
PyPIflake8-no-pep4202.9.0indirect
PyPIflake8-print5.0.0indirect
PyPIflake8-pyi26.5.0indirect
PyPIflake8-pyproject1.2.4indirect
PyPIflake8-pytest-style2.2.0indirect
PyPIflake8-quotes3.4.0indirect
PyPIflake8-raise0.0.5indirect
PyPIflake8-self0.2.2indirect
PyPIflake8-simplify0.30.0indirect
PyPIflake8-tidy-imports4.12.0indirect
PyPIflake8-todos0.3.1indirect
PyPIflake8-type-checking3.2.0indirect
PyPIflake8-unused-arguments0.0.14indirect
PyPIflynt1.0.6indirect
PyPIfuro2025.12.19indirect
PyPIinterrogate1.7.0indirect
PyPIisort8.0.1indirect
PyPImdformat-gfm1.0.0indirect
PyPImdformat-pyproject0.1.1indirect
PyPImypy2.3.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser5.1.0indirect
PyPIpep8-naming0.15.1indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.1indirect
PyPIpydoclint0.9.1indirect
PyPIpydocstyle6.3.0indirect
PyPIpylint-per-file-ignores3.2.1indirect
PyPIpylint-pydantic0.4.1indirect
PyPIpymarkdownlnt0.9.39indirect
PyPIpyproject-fmt2.27.0indirect
PyPIpyrefly1.2.0indirect
PyPIpyright1.1.411indirect
PyPIpyroma5.0.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-playwright0.8.0indirect
PyPIpytest-recording0.13.4indirect
PyPIpyupgrade3.21.2indirect
PyPIradon6.0.1indirect
PyPIrefurb2.3.1indirect
PyPIresponses0.26.2indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.19.1indirect
PyPIsemgrep1.172.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild2025.8.25indirect
PyPIsphinx-click6.2.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton0.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-design0.7.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-lint1.0.2indirect
PyPIssort0.17.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItox-ini-fmt1.8.1indirect
PyPItox-workdir0.1.0indirect
PyPItryceratops2.4.1indirect
PyPItypes-attrs19.1.0indirect
PyPItypes-babel2.11.0.15indirect
PyPItypes-beautifulsoup44.12.0.20250516indirect
PyPItypes-boltons26.1.0.20260724indirect
PyPItypes-cachetools7.0.0.20260713indirect
PyPItypes-certifi2021.10.8.3indirect
PyPItypes-cffi2.0.0.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-click7.1.8indirect
PyPItypes-colorama0.4.15.20260508indirect
PyPItypes-cryptography3.3.23.2indirect
PyPItypes-docutils0.22.3.20260724indirect
PyPItypes-filelock3.2.7indirect
PyPItypes-flake87.3.0.20260508indirect
PyPItypes-flake8-20201.8.0.20240818indirect
PyPItypes-flake8-bugbear25.11.29.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-flake8-builtins3.1.0.20260508indirect
PyPItypes-flake8-plugin-utils1.3.7.5indirect
PyPItypes-flake8-simplify0.30.0.20260408indirect
PyPItypes-greenlet3.5.0.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-jinja22.11.9indirect
PyPItypes-jsonschema4.26.0.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-markupsafe1.1.10indirect
PyPItypes-mypy-extensions1.1.0.20260724indirect
PyPItypes-peewee4.3.0.20260802indirect
PyPItypes-pep8-naming0.15.0.20260408indirect
PyPItypes-pluggy1.2.0.20240106indirect
PyPItypes-polib1.2.0.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-protobuf7.34.1.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-pyflakes3.4.0.20260724indirect
PyPItypes-pygments2.20.0.20260728indirect
PyPItypes-pyjwt1.7.1indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.9.0.20260716indirect
PyPItypes-python-slugify8.0.2.20240310indirect
PyPItypes-pywin32312.0.0.20260724indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260724indirect
PyPItypes-regex2026.7.19.20260720indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.33.0.20260712indirect
PyPItypes-setuptools83.0.0.20260724indirect
PyPItypes-six1.17.0.20260724indirect
PyPItypes-tabulate0.10.0.20260508indirect
PyPItypes-toml0.10.8.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-typing-extensions3.7.3indirect
PyPItypes-tzdata2026.0.0.20260408indirect
PyPItypes-tzlocal5.1.0.1indirect
PyPItypes-urllib31.26.25.14indirect
PyPIunimport0.11.1indirect
PyPIuv0.12.1indirect
PyPIvalidate-pyproject0.25indirect
PyPIvulture2.16indirect
PyPIyamllint1.38.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 150 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.