Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 16:33 UTC

chapmanjacobd / library

99+ CLI tools to build, browse, and blend your media library

PythonBSD-3-Clause★ 485 stars⑂ 16 forkssince Dec 2021View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#sqlite #curation #datacuration #media #playlist #videos #music #data-collection #ffmpeg #datasette-tool #mpv #ffprobe #yt-dlp #cli #files #folders #gallery-dl #command-line #broadcatching #qbittorrent-nox

chapmanjacobd/library holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Security (42/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jacob ChapmanPersonal account

155 followers171 public repossince Jun 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	library	4.0.0	2,555	78	1 day ago	media library archive database ffmpeg yt-dlp mpv filesystem torrent

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

93Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
29.1/36	Commit cadence — 42/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 254 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	254
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	42

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~10.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v4.0.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1
mean_days_between_releases	10.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

69Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

57Moderate

How it's scored

43.6/60	Stars — 485 stars
9.8/25	Forks — 16 forks
3.9/15	Watchers — 6 watchers

Inputs used

forks	16
stars	485
watchers	6
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

57Moderate

How it's scored

45.4/80	Monthly downloads — 2,555 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	library
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	2,555
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

18Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
5.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	4
top_contributor_share	0.995

Issue & PR responsiveness

69Good

How it's scored

35.5/42	Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
24.5/30	PR acceptance — 9/11 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	9
open_issues	6
closed_issues	33
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.846
closed_unmerged_prs	2
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

64Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
15.8/25	Owner reach — 155 followers of chapmanjacobd
25/25	Track record — 171 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	155
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	chapmanjacobd
public_repos	171
account_age_days	4,509

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20	Version history — 78 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	library
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black], [tool.isort])
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/chapmanjacobd/library#usage
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 20 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	sqlite, curation, datacuration, media, playlist, videos, music, data-collection, ffmpeg, datasette-tool, mpv, ffprobe, yt-dlp, cli, files, folders, gallery-dl, command-line, broadcatching, qbittorrent-nox
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	https://github.com/chapmanjacobd/library#usage
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

27At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 24 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	2.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	33
affected_packages	5
assessed_packages	269
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 4, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 269 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

9Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9.1/40	Legible commit history — 17 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.17
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

48Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black], [tool.isort])
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.7/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/332 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	127,835
source_files_sampled	332
oversized_source_files	2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

485GitHub stars

4contributors

254commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

6open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
deps.dev does not index pypi:library@4.0.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 16 ⇿

0Stars

16Forks

90Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 90

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.7 / 10

2.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 16:33 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	24 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 28

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`>=4.10.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	certifi	`>=2026.10.19`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sqlite-utils	`>=3.38`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	ipython	`>=9.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	ffmpeg-python	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	yt-dlp	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	natsort	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	puremagic	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	ftfy	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	wcwidth	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	humanize	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	lxml	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	mutagen	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	praw	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pip	`>=26.2.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pysubs2	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-dateutil	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-mpv-jsonipc	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	regex	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	rich	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	screeninfo	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	tabulate	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	tinytag	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	tldextract	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyreadline3	`—`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 269

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 28 direct and 241 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.15.0`	direct
PyPI	certifi	`2026.10.19`	direct
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.5.2`	direct
PyPI	ffmpeg-python	`0.2.0`	direct
PyPI	ftfy	`6.3.1`	direct
PyPI	humanize	`4.16.0`	direct
PyPI	ipython	`9.17.1`	direct
PyPI	lxml	`6.1.3`	direct
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.2.0`	direct
PyPI	mutagen	`1.48.1`	direct
PyPI	natsort	`8.4.0`	direct
PyPI	pip	`26.2.2`	direct
PyPI	praw	`8.0.3`	direct
PyPI	puremagic	`2.2.0`	direct
PyPI	pyreadline3	`3.5.6`	direct
PyPI	pysubs2	`1.9.0`	direct
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	direct
PyPI	python-mpv-jsonipc	`1.4.0`	direct
PyPI	regex	`2026.9.29`	direct
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	direct
PyPI	rich	`15.0.0`	direct
PyPI	screeninfo	`0.8.1`	direct
PyPI	sqlite-utils	`4.2.1`	direct
PyPI	tabulate	`0.10.0`	direct
PyPI	tinytag	`2.3.2`	direct
PyPI	tldextract	`5.4.0`	direct
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.9.2`	direct
PyPI	yt-dlp	`2026.8.19`	direct
PyPI	aiohappyeyeballs	`2.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.14.5`	indirect
PyPI	aioquic	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	aiosignal	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	annoy	`1.17.3`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.14.2`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	argcomplete	`3.7.2`	indirect
PyPI	argon2-cffi	`25.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	argon2-cffi-bindings	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	asgiref	`3.11.1`	indirect
PyPI	asttokens	`3.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	audioop-lts	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	babelfish	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	bcrypt	`5.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	black	`26.10.1`	indirect
PyPI	blinker	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	brotli	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	brotlicffi	`1.2.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	camelot-py	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	casttube	`0.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	catt	`0.13.3`	indirect
PyPI	cdx-toolkit	`0.9.39`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	chardet	`7.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	click-default-group	`1.2.4`	indirect
PyPI	click-option-group	`0.5.9`	indirect
PyPI	cloudpickle	`3.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	colorclass	`2.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	compressed-rtf	`1.0.7`	indirect
PyPI	contourpy	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`48.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	curl-cffi	`0.16.3`	indirect
PyPI	cycler	`0.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	cython	`3.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	decorator	`5.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	defusedxml	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	deprecation	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	docx2txt	`0.9`	indirect
PyPI	dogpile-cache	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	easygui	`0.98.3`	indirect
PyPI	ebcdic	`2.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	enzyme	`0.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	et-xmlfile	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	executing	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	extract-msg	`0.56.1`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`4.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	flask	`3.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	fonttools	`4.66.1`	indirect
PyPI	fpdf2	`2.8.9`	indirect
PyPI	freezegun	`1.5.5`	indirect
PyPI	frozenlist	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	fsspec	`2026.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	future	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	gallery-dl	`1.32.16`	indirect
PyPI	geopandas	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	ghostscript	`0.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	guessit	`4.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	h2	`4.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	hf-xet	`1.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	hpack	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore2	`2.13.1`	indirect
PyPI	httpx2	`2.13.1`	indirect
PyPI	httpx2-jsfetch	`1.0`	indirect
PyPI	huggingface-hub	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	hyperframe	`6.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.20`	indirect
PyPI	ifaddr	`0.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	img2pdf	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	internetarchive	`5.11.1`	indirect
PyPI	invoke	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	ipython-pygments-lexers	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	isort	`9.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	itsdangerous	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	jedi	`0.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	joblib	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonpatch	`1.35`	indirect
PyPI	jsonpointer	`3.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.26.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`2025.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	kaitaistruct	`0.11`	indirect
PyPI	kiwisolver	`1.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	knowit	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	lark	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	ldap3	`2.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	library	`4.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	libtorrent	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib	`3.11.2`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib-inline	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mitmproxy	`12.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	mitmproxy-linux	`0.12.11`	indirect
PyPI	mitmproxy-macos	`0.12.11`	indirect
PyPI	mitmproxy-rs	`0.12.11`	indirect
PyPI	mitmproxy-windows	`0.12.11`	indirect
PyPI	msgpack	`1.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	msoffcrypto-tool	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	narwhals	`2.27.1`	indirect
PyPI	numpy	`2.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	ocrmypdf	`16.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	ocrmypdf	`17.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	olefile	`0.47`	indirect
PyPI	oletools	`0.60.2`	indirect
PyPI	opencv-python	`5.0.0.93`	indirect
PyPI	opencv-python-headless	`5.0.0.93`	indirect
PyPI	openpyxl	`3.1.5`	indirect
PyPI	orjson	`3.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	outcome	`1.3.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.3`	indirect
PyPI	pandas	`3.0.6`	indirect
PyPI	paramiko	`5.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	parso	`0.8.7`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pcodedmp	`1.2.6`	indirect
PyPI	pdf2image	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	pdfminer-six	`20260107`	indirect
PyPI	pexpect	`4.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	pi-heif	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pikepdf	`10.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`12.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	playa-pdf	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	prawcore	`4.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.53`	indirect
PyPI	propcache	`0.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	protobuf	`7.36.2`	indirect
PyPI	psutil	`7.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	ptyprocess	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	publicsuffix2	`2.20191221`	indirect
PyPI	pure-eval	`0.2.4`	indirect
PyPI	pyasn1	`0.6.4`	indirect
PyPI	pychromecast	`14.0.10`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.11`	indirect
PyPI	pycryptodomex	`3.24.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.11.10`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.33.2`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.50.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydivert	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyexiftool	`0.5.6`	indirect
PyPI	pyfakefs	`6.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.21.0`	indirect
PyPI	pylsqpack	`0.3.24`	indirect
PyPI	pymcdm	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pymediainfo	`7.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	pynacl	`1.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyobjc-core	`12.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyobjc-framework-cocoa	`12.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyogrio	`0.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyopenssl	`26.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyparsing	`3.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	pypdfium2	`5.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyperclip	`1.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyproj	`3.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	pysocks	`1.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-datadir	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-regressions	`2.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-pptx	`1.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytokens	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyvirtualdisplay	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	qbittorrent-api	`2026.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	rebulk	`6.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	red-black-tree-mod	`1.22`	indirect
PyPI	referencing	`0.37.0`	indirect
PyPI	requests-file	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`2026.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	rtfde	`0.1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	ruamel-yaml	`0.19.1`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	safetensors	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	scikit-learn	`1.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	scipy	`1.18.1`	indirect
PyPI	selenium	`4.36.0`	indirect
PyPI	selenium	`4.51.0`	indirect
PyPI	selenium-wire-lw	`3.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	service-identity	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	shapely	`2.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	sniffio	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	sortedcontainers	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	speechrecognition	`3.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	sqlite-fts4	`1.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	srt	`3.5.3`	indirect
PyPI	ssort	`0.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	stack-data	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	standard-aifc	`3.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	standard-chunk	`3.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	stevedore	`5.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	subliminal	`2.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	textract-py3	`2.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	threadpoolctl	`3.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	tokenizers	`0.23.3`	indirect
PyPI	toml	`0.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	tornado	`6.5.5`	indirect
PyPI	tqdm	`4.70.1`	indirect
PyPI	traitlets	`5.16.1`	indirect
PyPI	trakit	`0.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	trio	`0.34.0`	indirect
PyPI	trio-websocket	`0.12.2`	indirect
PyPI	truststore	`0.10.4`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2026.5`	indirect
PyPI	tzlocal	`5.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	uharfbuzz	`0.56.3`	indirect
PyPI	update-checker	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	urwid	`3.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	warcio	`1.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	websocket-client	`1.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`17.2`	indirect
PyPI	werkzeug	`3.1.9`	indirect
PyPI	win-unicode-console	`0.5`	indirect
PyPI	wordllama	`0.4.0.post1`	indirect
PyPI	wsproto	`1.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	xattr	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	xlrd	`2.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	xlsxwriter	`3.2.9`	indirect
PyPI	xmltodict	`1.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`1.25.1`	indirect
PyPI	yt-dlp-ejs	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	zeroconf	`0.151.5`	indirect
PyPI	zstandard	`0.25.0`	indirect
PyPI	zstd	`1.5.7.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 269 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
cryptography	`48.0.1`	indirect	high	6	`50.0.0`
msgpack	`1.1.2`	indirect	high	2	`1.2.1`
pillow	`12.3.0`	indirect	high	9	`13.0.0`
tornado	`6.5.5`	indirect	high	14	`6.5.9`
h2	`4.3.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`4.4.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records