Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 08:50 UTC

coveo / plasma

Plasma components implemented with React!

TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 73 stars⑂ 18 forkssince Sep 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolWeb interfacehow this is determined

coveo/plasma holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (63/100). It was last updated today. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

93
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

93
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CoveoOrganization · verified domain
168 followers51 public repossince Sep 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@coveord/plasma-llms60.2.1305918 days agoaicoveodocumentationllmsmantineplasma
npm@coveord/plasma-tokens60.0.06,25718562 days ago—
npm@coveord/plasma-mantine61.2.023,37735418 days agocomponentscoveomantineplasma
npm@coveord/plasma-mcp-server60.2.1341918 days agoaicoveodesign-systemmantinemcpplasma
npm@coveord/plasma-react-icons60.0.023,05414862 days agoiconsplasmareact

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
35.3/36Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 433 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year433
human_commit_share0.67
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year51

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 18 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag@coveord/plasma-llms@60.2.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release18
mean_days_between_releases2.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
30.1/60Stars — 73 stars
10.3/25Forks — 18 forks
5.8/15Watchers — 12 watchers
Inputs used
forks18
stars73
watchers12
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
63/80Monthly downloads — 53,334 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@coveord/plasma-llms, @coveord/plasma-tokens, @coveord/plasma-mantine, @coveord/plasma-mcp-server, @coveord/plasma-react-icons
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads53,334
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

91Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 18% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 90 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled90
top_contributor_share0.185
How it's scored
40.7/42Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
24.9/30PR acceptance — 3,770/4,547 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs3,770
open_issues1
closed_issues32
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d20
prs_decided_30d21
issue_closed_ratio0.97
closed_unmerged_prs777
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
16/25Owner reach — 168 followers of coveo
24.5/25Track record — 51 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers168
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logincoveo
public_repos51
account_age_days4,389

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 5 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 18 days ago
20/20Version history — 354 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@coveord/plasma-llms, @coveord/plasma-tokens, @coveord/plasma-mantine, @coveord/plasma-mcp-server, @coveord/plasma-react-icons
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish18

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://plasma.coveo.com
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://plasma.coveo.com
docs_sitehttps://plasma.coveo.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

72Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages74
unassessed_packages2
affected_by_severitymoderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 74 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://plasma.coveo.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 67 of 67 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://plasma.coveo.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes9,060
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — packages/figma/tsconfig.json, packages/llms/tsconfig.json, packages/mantine/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-server/lib/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-server/tsconfig.json, packages/react-icons/tsconfig.json, packages/storybook/tsconfig.json, packages/tokens/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 13 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configspackages/figma/tsconfig.json, packages/llms/tsconfig.json, packages/mantine/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-server/lib/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-server/tsconfig.json, packages/react-icons/tsconfig.json, packages/storybook/tsconfig.json, packages/tokens/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.13
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/495 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes32,269
source_files_sampled495
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

73GitHub stars
90contributors
433commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
4bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 18 ⇿
0Stars
18Forks
83Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201812017-122022-032026-06
Major 4Minor 29Patch 31

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 08:50 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 40
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@coveord/plasma-mantineworkspace:*packages/figma/package.json
npm@coveord/plasma-react-iconsworkspace:*packages/figma/package.json
npm@figma/code-connect1.4.9packages/figma/package.json
npmreact19.2.7packages/figma/package.json
npm@coveord/plasma-react-iconsworkspace:*packages/mantine/package.json
npm@coveord/plasma-tokensworkspace:*packages/mantine/package.json
npm@dnd-kit/core6.3.1packages/mantine/package.json
npm@dnd-kit/modifiers9.0.0packages/mantine/package.json
npm@dnd-kit/sortable10.0.0packages/mantine/package.json
npm@dnd-kit/utilities3.2.2packages/mantine/package.json
npm@mantine/utils6.0.22packages/mantine/package.json
npm@monaco-editor/react4.7.0packages/mantine/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-table8.21.3packages/mantine/package.json
npm@tanstack/table-core8.21.3packages/mantine/package.json
npmclsx2.1.1packages/mantine/package.json
npmdayjs1.11.21packages/mantine/package.json
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3packages/mantine/package.json
npmlodash.defaultsdeep4.6.1packages/mantine/package.json
npmmonaco-editor0.55.1packages/mantine/package.json
npmtslib2.8.1packages/mantine/package.json
npm@tmcp/adapter-valibot0.1.6packages/mcp-server/package.json
npm@tmcp/transport-stdio0.4.3packages/mcp-server/package.json
npmtmcp1.19.4packages/mcp-server/package.json
npmvalibot1.4.2packages/mcp-server/package.json
npm@tabler/icons-react3.45.0packages/react-icons/package.json
npmtslib2.8.1packages/react-icons/package.json
npm@coveord/plasma-mantineworkspace:*packages/storybook/package.json
npm@coveord/plasma-react-iconsworkspace:*packages/storybook/package.json
npm@faker-js/faker10.5.0packages/storybook/package.json
npm@mantine/core9.2.1packages/storybook/package.json
npm@mantine/dates9.2.1packages/storybook/package.json
npm@mantine/form9.2.1packages/storybook/package.json
npm@mantine/hooks9.2.1packages/storybook/package.json
npm@mantine/modals9.2.1packages/storybook/package.json
npm@mantine/notifications9.2.1packages/storybook/package.json
npmdayjs1.11.21packages/storybook/package.json
npmreact19.2.7packages/storybook/package.json
npmreact-dom19.2.7packages/storybook/package.json
npmreact-hook-form7.81.0packages/storybook/package.json
npmtslib2.8.1packages/tokens/package.json
All dependencies 76

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 30 direct and 46 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@dnd-kit/core6.3.1direct
npm@dnd-kit/modifiers9.0.0direct
npm@dnd-kit/sortable10.0.0direct
npm@dnd-kit/utilities3.2.2direct
npm@faker-js/faker10.5.0direct
npm@figma/code-connect1.4.9direct
npm@mantine/core9.2.1direct
npm@mantine/dates9.2.1direct
npm@mantine/form9.2.1direct
npm@mantine/hooks9.2.1direct
npm@mantine/modals9.2.1direct
npm@mantine/notifications9.2.1direct
npm@mantine/utils6.0.22direct
npm@monaco-editor/react4.7.0direct
npm@tabler/icons-react3.45.0direct
npm@tanstack/react-table8.21.3direct
npm@tanstack/table-core8.21.3direct
npm@tmcp/adapter-valibot0.1.6direct
npm@tmcp/transport-stdio0.4.3direct
npmclsx2.1.1direct
npmdayjs1.11.21direct
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3direct
npmlodash.defaultsdeep4.6.1direct
npmmonaco-editor0.55.1direct
npmreact19.2.7direct
npmreact-dom19.2.7direct
npmreact-hook-form7.81.0direct
npmtmcp1.19.4direct
npmtslib2.8.1direct
npmvalibot1.4.2direct
npm@babel/types7.29.7indirect
npm@mantine/carousel9.2.1indirect
npm@mantine/code-highlight9.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.darwin-arm6412.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.darwin-x6412.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-arm6412.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-arm64-musl12.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-x6412.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.linux-x64-musl12.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.win32-arm6412.2.1indirect
npm@pnpm/exe.win32-x6412.2.1indirect
npm@storybook/addon-docs10.5.2indirect
npm@storybook/react-vite10.5.2indirect
npm@svgr/core8.1.0indirect
npm@svgr/plugin-jsx8.1.0indirect
npm@testing-library/dom10.4.1indirect
npm@testing-library/jest-dom7.0.0indirect
npm@testing-library/react16.3.2indirect
npm@testing-library/user-event14.6.1indirect
npm@types/lodash.defaultsdeep4.6.9indirect
npm@types/node24.13.3indirect
npm@types/react19.2.17indirect
npm@types/react-dom19.2.3indirect
npm@typescript/native-preview7.0.0-dev.20260707.2indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-react6.0.3indirect
npmcross-env10.1.0indirect
npmembla-carousel8.6.0indirect
npmembla-carousel-react8.6.0indirect
npmfs-extra11.3.6indirect
npmglob13.0.6indirect
npmglobals17.7.0indirect
npmgray-matter4.0.3indirect
npmjsdom30.0.1indirect
npmlodash.groupby4.6.0indirect
npmlodash.upperfirst4.3.1indirect
npmpnpm12.2.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.23indirect
npmpostcss-preset-mantine1.18.0indirect
npmpostcss-preset-mantine^1.11.0indirect
npmpostcss-simple-vars^7.0.1indirect
npmpublint0.3.21indirect
npmrimraf6.1.3indirect
npmstorybook10.5.2indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmvite8.1.5indirect
npmvitest4.1.10indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 74 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
vitest4.1.10indirectmoderate15.0.0-rc.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.