Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 10:40 UTC

delivstat / swarmkit

An open-source framework for composing, running, and growing multi-agent AI swarms.

Python · TypeScriptMIT★ 3 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolWeb interfaceNetwork serviceMCP serverLibraryhow this is determined

delivstat/swarmkit holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Security (39/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Delivstat Technology SolutionsPersonal account
2 followers9 public repossince Mar 2019Delivstat Technology Solutions

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIswarmkit-webui0.19.0635170 days ago—
PyPIswarmkit-runtime1.218.05,9112200 days agoagentsagtlanggraphmcpmulti-agentswarm

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

76Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 706 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year706
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.218.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

45Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

5Critical
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars3
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

63Moderate
How it's scored
50.3/80Monthly downloads — 5,911 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesswarmkit-runtime
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads5,911
unverified_packages_excludedswarmkit-webui
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

83Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.8/30PR acceptance — 870/877 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs870
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d31
prs_decided_7d31
prs_merged_30d59
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs7
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

41Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of delivstat
19.3/25Track record — 9 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logindelivstat
public_repos9
account_age_days2,725
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 220 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesswarmkit-webui, swarmkit-runtime
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — biome.json, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://delivstat.github.io/swarmkit/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://delivstat.github.io/swarmkit/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

39Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

39Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 104 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md, packages/runtime/CLAUDE.md, packages/schema/CLAUDE.md, packages/ui/CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md, packages/runtime/CLAUDE.md, packages/schema/CLAUDE.md, packages/ui/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes13,233

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — biome.json, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — packages/control-plane-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/schema/typescript/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json, packages/webui/src/swarmkit_webui/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/control-plane-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/schema/typescript/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json, packages/webui/src/swarmkit_webui/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (packages/control-plane-ui/tsconfig.json, packages/schema/typescript/tsconfig.json, packages/ui/tsconfig.json, packages/webui/src/swarmkit_webui/py.typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/869 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes69,914
source_files_sampled869
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

60Moderate
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — demos, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsdemos, examples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

3GitHub stars
1contributors
706commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'swarmkit-workspace' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'swarmkit-control-plane' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:swarmkit-webui@0.19.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 10:40 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities104 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 78
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@radix-ui/react-slot^1.1.0packages/control-plane-ui/package.json
npm@tailwindcss/postcss^4.3.0packages/control-plane-ui/package.json
npm@xyflow/react^12.3.0packages/control-plane-ui/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.0packages/control-plane-ui/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1packages/control-plane-ui/package.json
npmlucide-react^1.16.0packages/control-plane-ui/package.json
npmnext^15.0.0packages/control-plane-ui/package.json
npmoidc-client-ts^3.5.0packages/control-plane-ui/package.json
npmreact^19.0.0packages/control-plane-ui/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.0.0packages/control-plane-ui/package.json
npmreact-oidc-context^3.3.1packages/control-plane-ui/package.json
npmswr^2.2.5packages/control-plane-ui/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0packages/control-plane-ui/package.json
npmtailwindcss^4.3.0packages/control-plane-ui/package.json
PyPIfastapi>=0.110packages/control-plane/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.27packages/control-plane/pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.30packages/control-plane/pyproject.toml
PyPItyper>=0.12packages/control-plane/pyproject.toml
PyPIPyJWT>=2.8packages/control-plane/pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy>=2.0packages/control-plane/pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg>=3.1packages/control-plane/pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=42packages/control-plane/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.8packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIruamel.yaml>=0.18packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPItyper>=0.12packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=13.7packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIprompt-toolkit>=3.0packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.27packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIanyio>=4.4packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIlanggraph>=0.2packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIlanggraph-checkpoint-sqlite>=2.0packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-core>=0.3packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIagent-os-kernel>=3.2.0,<4.0packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIagentmesh-platform>=3.2.0,<4.0packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIagent-sre>=3.2.0,<4.0packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=1.0packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIanthropic>=0.39packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-genai>=1.0packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai>=1.50packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi>=0.115packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.30packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy>=2.0packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg>=3.1packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiosqlite>=0.20packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-api>=1.20packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk>=1.20packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http>=1.20packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
PyPIswarmkit-schema>=1.40.0packages/runtime/pyproject.toml
npm@radix-ui/react-checkbox^1.1.3packages/ui/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dialog^1.1.4packages/ui/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dropdown-menu^2.1.4packages/ui/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-label^2.1.1packages/ui/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-scroll-area^1.2.2packages/ui/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-select^2.1.4packages/ui/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-separator^1.1.1packages/ui/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-slot^1.1.1packages/ui/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-switch^1.1.2packages/ui/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tabs^1.1.2packages/ui/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tooltip^1.1.6packages/ui/package.json
npm@swarmkit/schemaworkspace:*packages/ui/package.json
npm@tailwindcss/postcss^4.3.0packages/ui/package.json
npm@xyflow/react^12.3.0packages/ui/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1packages/ui/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1packages/ui/package.json
npmgeist^1.3.1packages/ui/package.json
npmjs-yaml^4.1.0packages/ui/package.json
npmlucide-react^1.16.0packages/ui/package.json
npmnext^15.0.0packages/ui/package.json
npmoidc-client-ts^3.5.0packages/ui/package.json
npmreact^19.0.0packages/ui/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.0.0packages/ui/package.json
npmreact-markdown^10.1.0packages/ui/package.json
npmreact-oidc-context^3.3.1packages/ui/package.json
npmremark-gfm^4.0.1packages/ui/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0packages/ui/package.json
npmtailwindcss^4.3.0packages/ui/package.json
npmzustand^5.0.0packages/ui/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with delivstat/swarmkit. Read them side by side →

100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional95pipeshub-ai/pipeshub-aiPipesHub is an open-source platform for securely connecting enterprise knowledge to AI. Give AI agents trusted context and your team permission-aware search with verified citations across your business systems.Exceptional98ModelEngine-Group/nexentNexent is a zero-code platform for auto-generating production-grade AI agents using Harness Engineering principles — unified tools, skills, memory, and orchestration with built-in constraints, feedback loops, and control planes.Exceptional98bytedance/deer-flowAn open-source long-horizon SuperAgent harness that researches, codes, and creates. With the help of sandboxes, memories, tools, skill, subagents and message gateway, it handles different levels of tasks that could take minutes to hours.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.