Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.7.0 · 2026-08-16 23:04 UTC

eigent-ai / eigent

Eigent: The Open Source Cowork Desktop - Local and Free Alternative to Claude Cowork and Codex

TypeScript · PythonApache-2.0★ 15,020 stars⑂ 1,783 forkssince Jul 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindDesktop applicationNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

eigent-ai/eigent holds a health index of 91 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Security (58/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

91
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

91
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 77 is calibrated to 91 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Eigent AIOrganization
357 followers5 public repossince Mar 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIbackendpoints to another repo — not scored0.2.4.112,68184562 days agodjangobackend

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
33.2/36Commit cadence — 48/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,972 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,972
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year48
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 33 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 26 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~16.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count33
latest_release_tagv1.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release26
mean_days_between_releases16.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

87Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 15,020 stars
25/25Forks — 1,783 forks
10.5/15Watchers — 78 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,783
stars15,020
watchers78
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 42% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 68 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled68
top_contributor_share0.419
How it's scored
33.4/42Issue resolution — 80% of issues closed
23.4/30PR acceptance — 805/1,032 decided PRs merged
5.2/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 4/10 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs805
open_issues149
closed_issues580
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d25
prs_decided_30d31
issue_closed_ratio0.796
closed_unmerged_prs227
first_time_authors_30d5
first_time_prs_merged_30d4
first_time_prs_decided_30d10
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
18.4/25Owner reach — 357 followers of eigent-ai
10.5/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers357
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logineigent-ai
public_repos5
account_age_days881

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.eigent.ai
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagent-framework, agent-skills, agentic-ai, agentic-workflow, claude-cowork, claude-cowork-alternative, claude-cowork-free, desktop-agent, multi-agent-systems
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.eigent.ai
docs_sitehttps://www.eigent.ai
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 91 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 84 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.848
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — backend/benchmark/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesbackend/benchmark/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 8/1,043 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes189,458
source_files_sampled1,043
oversized_source_files8
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — demos, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsdemos, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files

Key facts

15,020GitHub stars
68contributors
1,972commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
33releases
2bus factor
149open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'Eigent' from its registry
  • pypi package 'backend' points at a different repository (https://github.com/tr4n2uil/backend.django); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,783 ⇿
0Stars
1,783Forks
14Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

8001,0001,2001,4001,6001,8001,783822026-012026-052026-08
Major 1Minor 0Patch 13
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-16 23:04 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities91 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 126
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpip>=23.0backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIcamel-ai==0.2.91a5backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi>=0.115.12backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi-babel>=1.0.0backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.34.2backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-i18n>=0.4.5backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.1.0backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.28.1backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydash>=8.0.5backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIinflection>=0.5.1backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiofiles>=24.1.0backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai>=1.99.3,<2backend/pyproject.toml
PyPInodejs-wheel>=22.18.0backend/pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=1.23.0,<2.0.0backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIdebugpy>=1.8.17backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIqdrant-client>=1.16.2backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-api>=1.34.1backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk>=1.34.1backend/pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http>=1.34.1backend/pyproject.toml
PyPItruststore>=0.10.0backend/pyproject.toml
npm@electron/notarize^2.5.0package.json
npm@emotion/is-prop-valid^1.3.1package.json
npm@fontsource/inter^5.2.5package.json
npm@gsap/react^2.1.2package.json
npm@microsoft/fetch-event-source^2.0.1package.json
npm@monaco-editor/loader^1.5.0package.json
npm@monaco-editor/react^4.7.0package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-accordion^1.2.11package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-checkbox^1.1.4package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dialog^1.1.14package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dropdown-menu^2.1.15package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-label^2.1.7package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-popover^1.1.13package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-progress^1.1.7package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-select^2.2.5package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-separator^1.1.7package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-slot^1.2.3package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-switch^1.2.4package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tabs^1.1.11package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-toggle^1.1.9package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-toggle-group^1.1.10package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tooltip^1.2.7package.json
npm@stackframe/reactfile:package/@stackframe/reactpackage.json
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.90.19package.json
npm@xterm/addon-fit^0.10.0package.json
npm@xterm/addon-web-links^0.11.0package.json
npm@xterm/xterm^5.5.0package.json
npm@xyflow/react^12.6.4package.json
npmadm-zip^0.5.16package.json
npmarchiver^7.0.1package.json
npmaxios^1.9.0package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1package.json
npmcmdk^1.1.1package.json
npmcsv-parser^3.2.0package.json
npmdate-fns^3.6.0package.json
npmdompurify^3.2.7package.json
npmelectron-log^5.4.0package.json
npmelectron-updater^6.3.9package.json
npmembla-carousel-autoplay^8.6.0package.json
npmembla-carousel-react^8.6.0package.json
npmframer-motion^12.17.0package.json
npmgithub-markdown-css^5.8.1package.json
npmgsap^3.13.0package.json
npmkoffi^2.14.1package.json
npmlodash-es^4.17.21package.json
npmlottie-web^5.13.0package.json
npmlucide-react^0.548.0package.json
npmmammoth^1.9.1package.json
npmmarked^17.0.1package.json
npmmime^4.1.0package.json
npmmonaco-editor^0.52.2package.json
npmmotion^12.38.0package.json
npmnext-themes^0.4.6package.json
npmnode-pty^1.1.0package.json
npmpapaparse^5.5.3package.json
npmpostprocessing^6.37.8package.json
npmreact-day-picker^9.13.0package.json
npmreact-markdown^10.1.0package.json
npmreact-resizable-panels^3.0.4package.json
npmreact-router-dom^7.6.0package.json
npmremark-gfm^4.0.1package.json
npmsonner^2.0.6package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.3.0package.json
npmtailwindcss-animate^1.0.7package.json
npmtar^7.4.3package.json
npmthree^0.180.0package.json
npmtree-kill^1.2.2package.json
npmtw-animate-css^1.2.9package.json
npmunzipper^0.12.3package.json
npmxml2js^0.6.2package.json
npmzustand^5.0.4package.json
PyPIalembic>=1.15.2server/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai>=1.99.3,<2server/pyproject.toml
PyPIcamel-ai==0.2.90a6server/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.11.1server/pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.1.8server/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi>=0.115.12server/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi-babel>=1.0.0server/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi-pagination>=0.12.34server/pyproject.toml
PyPIpasslib>=1.7.4server/pyproject.toml
PyPIbcrypt==4.0.1server/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-i18n>=0.4.5server/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyjwt>=2.10.1server/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.1.0server/pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy-utils>=0.41.2server/pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlmodel>=0.0.24server/pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas>=2.2.3server/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenpyxl>=3.1.5server/pyproject.toml
PyPIarrow>=1.3.0server/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi-filter>=2.0.1server/pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg2-binary>=2.9.10server/pyproject.toml
PyPIconvert-case>=1.2.3server/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-multipart>=0.0.20server/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.28.1server/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydash>=8.0.5server/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.32.4server/pyproject.toml
PyPIitsdangerous>=2.2.0server/pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=45.0.4server/pyproject.toml
PyPIsqids>=0.5.2server/pyproject.toml
PyPIexa-py>=1.14.16server/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi-limiter>=0.1.6,<0.2.0server/pyproject.toml
PyPIslack-sdk>=3.39.0server/pyproject.toml
PyPIcelery>=5.6.2server/pyproject.toml
PyPIredis>=7.2.1server/pyproject.toml
PyPIloguru>=0.7.3server/pyproject.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.7.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.