Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 06:49 UTC

emberjs / website

Source for emberjs.com

HTML · CSS · RubyCustom license★ 664 stars⑂ 1,306 forkssince Oct 2011archivedView on GitHub ↗
#ember#javascript-framework#javascript#framework#html#css#single-page-applications

emberjs/website holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (91/100) and lowest on Vitality (20/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 51 is calibrated to 51 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ember.jsOrganization
327 followers62 public repossince Dec 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

20At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 2,676 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push2,676
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

48Weak
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 3 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recency — latest release 3,939 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~28.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count3
latest_release_tagv2.1.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release3,939
mean_days_between_releases28.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

76Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

78Good
How it's scored
45.8/60Stars — 664 stars
25/25Forks — 1,306 forks
7.1/15Watchers — 20 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,306
stars664
watchers20
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

74Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

91Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

94Exceptional
How it's scored
51.3/54Bus factor — 7 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
19.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 14% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 77 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor7
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.145

Issue & PR responsiveness

88Excellent
How it's scored
40.3/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
25.9/30PR acceptance — 2,733/3,165 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs2,733
open_issues28
closed_issues668
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.96
closed_unmerged_prs432
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

91Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
18.1/25Owner reach — 327 followers of emberjs
25/25Track record — 62 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers327
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginemberjs
public_repos62
account_age_days5,335
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

40Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

24At Risk
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://emberjs.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsember, javascript-framework, javascript, framework, html, css, single-page-applications
has_wikino
homepagehttps://emberjs.com
docs_sitehttps://emberjs.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

26At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

26At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 7/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 77 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project is archived
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 123 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

28At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

39Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — HTML without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/24 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageHTML
largest_source_bytes21,090
source_files_sampled24
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

664GitHub stars
100contributors
0commits, last 12 months
2,676days since last push
3releases
7bus factor
28open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.6 / 10
2.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 06:49 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 7/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 77 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities123 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 26
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsredcarpet—Gemfile
RubyGemsactivesupport—Gemfile
RubyGemshighline—Gemfile
RubyGemsrake—Gemfile
RubyGemscoderay—Gemfile
RubyGemsmiddleman~> 3.0Gemfile
RubyGemsmiddleman-blog~> 3.0Gemfile
RubyGemsthin—Gemfile
RubyGemsrack—Gemfile
RubyGemslisten—Gemfile
RubyGemsbuilder—Gemfile
RubyGemsmiddleman-alias—Gemfile
RubyGemsunderscore-rails—Gemfile
RubyGemsgmaps4rails—Gemfile
RubyGemsgeocoder—Gemfile
RubyGemsfaraday—Gemfile
RubyGemsbourbon~> 4.2.7Gemfile
RubyGemsneat~> 1.8.0Gemfile
RubyGemsbootstrap-sass~> 3.3.7Gemfile
RubyGemssass-rails>= 3.2Gemfile
RubyGemsmiddleman-bootstrap-navbar—Gemfile
RubyGemseventmachine1.0.9.1Gemfile
RubyGemsloofah>= 2.2.2Gemfile
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer>= 1.0.4Gemfile
RubyGemstzinfo-data—Gemfile
RubyGemswdm>= 0.1.0Gemfile
All dependencies 95

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 24 direct and 71 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsactivesupport4.2.10direct
RubyGemsbootstrap-sass3.3.7direct
RubyGemsbourbon4.2.7direct
RubyGemsbuilder3.2.3direct
RubyGemseventmachine1.0.9.1direct
RubyGemsfaraday0.9.2direct
RubyGemsgeocoder1.2.12direct
RubyGemsgmaps4rails2.1.2direct
RubyGemshighline1.7.8direct
RubyGemslisten3.0.4direct
RubyGemsloofah2.2.2direct
RubyGemsmiddleman3.4.0direct
RubyGemsmiddleman-blog3.5.3direct
RubyGemsmiddleman-bootstrap-navbar4.0.0direct
RubyGemsneat1.8.0direct
RubyGemsrack1.6.10direct
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.0.4direct
RubyGemsrake12.3.1direct
RubyGemsredcarpet3.3.3direct
RubyGemssass-rails5.0.7direct
RubyGemsthin1.7.1direct
RubyGemstzinfo-data1.2017.3direct
RubyGemsunderscore-rails1.8.3direct
RubyGemswdm0.1.1direct
RubyGemsactionpack4.2.10indirect
RubyGemsactionview4.2.10indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.3.8indirect
RubyGemsautoprefixer-rails7.2.5indirect
RubyGemsbootstrap-navbar3.0.0indirect
RubyGemsbyebug2.7.0indirect
RubyGemscapybara2.4.4indirect
RubyGemschunky_png1.3.5indirect
RubyGemscliver0.3.2indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script2.4.1indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script-source1.10.0indirect
RubyGemscolumnize0.9.0indirect
RubyGemscompass1.0.3indirect
RubyGemscompass-core1.0.3indirect
RubyGemscompass-import-once1.0.5indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.4indirect
RubyGemsdaemons1.2.4indirect
RubyGemsdebugger-linecache1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.2.5indirect
RubyGemserubis2.7.0indirect
RubyGemsexecjs2.6.0indirect
RubyGemsffi1.9.25-x86-mingw32indirect
RubyGemsgem_config0.3.1indirect
RubyGemshaml5.0.1indirect
RubyGemshike1.2.3indirect
RubyGemshooks0.4.1indirect
RubyGemsi18n0.7.0indirect
RubyGemsjson2.1.0indirect
RubyGemskramdown1.9.0indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsmiddleman-core3.4.0indirect
RubyGemsmiddleman-sprockets3.4.2indirect
RubyGemsmime-types2.6.2indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.3.0indirect
RubyGemsminitest5.11.3indirect
RubyGemsmulti_json1.13.1indirect
RubyGemsmultipart-post2.0.0indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.8.4-x86-mingw32indirect
RubyGemspadrino-helpers0.12.5indirect
RubyGemspadrino-support0.12.5indirect
RubyGemspoltergeist1.8.0indirect
RubyGemspry0.9.12.6-x86-mswin32indirect
RubyGemspry-byebug1.3.2indirect
RubyGemsrack-test0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsrails-deprecated_sanitizer1.0.3indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing1.0.9indirect
RubyGemsrailties4.2.10indirect
RubyGemsrb-fsevent0.9.6indirect
RubyGemsrb-inotify0.9.5indirect
RubyGemsrspec3.4.0indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.4.0indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.4.0indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.4.0indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.4.0indirect
RubyGemssass3.4.25indirect
RubyGemsslop3.6.0indirect
RubyGemssprockets2.12.5indirect
RubyGemssprockets-helpers1.1.0indirect
RubyGemssprockets-rails2.3.3indirect
RubyGemssprockets-sass1.3.1indirect
RubyGemstemple0.8.0indirect
RubyGemsthor0.20.0indirect
RubyGemsthread_safe0.3.6indirect
RubyGemstilt1.4.1indirect
RubyGemstzinfo1.2.5indirect
RubyGemsuber0.0.15indirect
RubyGemsuglifier2.7.2indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.6.3indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.2indirect
RubyGemswin32console1.3.2-x86-mswin32-60indirect
RubyGemsxpath2.0.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with emberjs/website. Read them side by side →

100carbon-design-system/carbonA design system built by IBMExceptional99electron/electron:electron: Build cross-platform desktop apps with JavaScript, HTML, and CSSExceptional98nestjs/nestA progressive Node.js framework for building efficient, scalable, and enterprise-grade server-side applications with TypeScript/JavaScript 🚀Exceptional98prettier/prettierPrettier is an opinionated code formatter.Exceptional96public-ui/kolibriThe accessible HTML-StandardExceptional98rails/railsRuby on RailsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.