Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 21:13 UTC

ibexa / oss

Custom license★ 21 stars⑂ 12 forkssince Oct 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

ibexa/oss holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (13/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

IbexaOrganization
40 followers100 public repossince May 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistibexa/ossv5.0.1025,80016122 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
15.2/18Commit volume — 48 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year48
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 22 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~18.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv5.0.10
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release22
mean_days_between_releases18.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
21.1/60Stars — 21 stars
8.7/25Forks — 12 forks
6/15Watchers — 13 watchers
Inputs used
forks12
stars21
watchers13
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
58.8/80Monthly downloads — 25,800 downloads/month across packagist
6.4/20Registry dependents — 8 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesibexa/oss
dependents8
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads886,090
monthly_downloads25,800
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 32% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 24 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled24
top_contributor_share0.325
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
13.3/30PR acceptance — 125/282 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs125
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs157
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.6/25Owner reach — 40 followers of ibexa
25/25Track record — 100 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers40
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginibexa
public_repos100
account_age_days2,307

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 22 days ago
20/20Version history — 161 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesibexa/oss
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish22

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

45Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsibexa-metapackage, ibexa-product
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

13Critical · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
24/40Legible commit history — 45 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.45
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Key facts

21GitHub stars
24contributors
48commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Language breakdown unavailable
  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 12 ⇿
0Stars
12Forks
45Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810121212021-022022-082024-02
Major 0Minor 4Patch 28

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 21:13 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 9/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 53
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistdoctrine/doctrine-migrations-bundle^3.0composer.json
Packagistibexa/doctrine-schema~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/system-info~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/admin-ui~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/admin-ui-assetsdev-6.0-nextcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/content-forms~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/core~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/core-persistence~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/core-search~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/cron~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/design-engine~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/fieldtype-matrix~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/fieldtype-query~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/fieldtype-richtext~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/graphql~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/http-cache~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/i18n~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/messenger~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/notifications~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/post-install~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/rest~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/search~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/solr~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/standard-design~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/translations~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/twig-components~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/user~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistsymfony/asset^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/cache^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dotenv^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/expression-language^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/flex^2composer.json
Packagistsymfony/form^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/mailer^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/monolog-bundle^3.6.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/process^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/security-bundle^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/serializer-pack^1.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/translation^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/twig-bundle^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/validator^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/web-link^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/webpack-encore-bundle^2.2composer.json
Packagistsymfony/yaml^7.4composer.json
Packagistfriendsofsymfony/jsrouting-bundle^3.5.0composer.json
Packagistknplabs/knp-menu-bundle^3.1composer.json
Packagistlexik/jwt-authentication-bundle^2.10.5composer.json
Packagistmonolog/monolog^3.8composer.json
Packagistoverblog/graphiql-bundle^1.0composer.json
Packagisttwig/extra-bundle^3.1.1composer.json
Packagistdoctrine/doctrine-bundle^2.11.0composer.json
All dependencies 56

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 53 direct and 3 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistdoctrine/doctrine-bundle—direct
Packagistdoctrine/doctrine-migrations-bundle—direct
Packagistfriendsofsymfony/jsrouting-bundle—direct
Packagistibexa/admin-ui—direct
Packagistibexa/admin-ui-assets—direct
Packagistibexa/content-forms—direct
Packagistibexa/core—direct
Packagistibexa/core-persistence—direct
Packagistibexa/core-search—direct
Packagistibexa/cron—direct
Packagistibexa/design-engine—direct
Packagistibexa/doctrine-schema—direct
Packagistibexa/fieldtype-matrix—direct
Packagistibexa/fieldtype-query—direct
Packagistibexa/fieldtype-richtext—direct
Packagistibexa/graphql—direct
Packagistibexa/http-cache—direct
Packagistibexa/i18n—direct
Packagistibexa/messenger—direct
Packagistibexa/notifications—direct
Packagistibexa/post-install—direct
Packagistibexa/rest—direct
Packagistibexa/search—direct
Packagistibexa/solr—direct
Packagistibexa/standard-design—direct
Packagistibexa/system-info—direct
Packagistibexa/translations—direct
Packagistibexa/twig-components—direct
Packagistibexa/user—direct
Packagistknplabs/knp-menu-bundle—direct
Packagistlexik/jwt-authentication-bundle—direct
Packagistmonolog/monolog—direct
Packagistoverblog/graphiql-bundle—direct
Packagistsymfony/asset—direct
Packagistsymfony/cache—direct
Packagistsymfony/console—direct
Packagistsymfony/dotenv—direct
Packagistsymfony/expression-language—direct
Packagistsymfony/flex—direct
Packagistsymfony/form—direct
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle—direct
Packagistsymfony/mailer—direct
Packagistsymfony/monolog-bundle—direct
Packagistsymfony/process—direct
Packagistsymfony/security-bundle—direct
Packagistsymfony/serializer-pack—direct
Packagistsymfony/translation—direct
Packagistsymfony/twig-bundle—direct
Packagistsymfony/validator—direct
Packagistsymfony/web-link—direct
Packagistsymfony/webpack-encore-bundle—direct
Packagistsymfony/yaml—direct
Packagisttwig/extra-bundle—direct
Packagistext-ctype—indirect
Packagistext-iconv—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.