Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-11 07:58 UTC

jamesmunns / postcard

A no_std + serde compatible message library for Rust

RustApache-2.0★ 1,486 stars⑂ 140 forkssince Apr 2019View on GitHub ↗

jamesmunns/postcard holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (72/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (48/100). It was last updated 21 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

James MunnsPersonal account
1,164 followers349 public repossince Aug 2012@oxidecomputer

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iopostcard1.1.36,379,75440382 days agocobsframingserdeembeddedno-std
crates.iopostcard20.2.113,6723226 days agoserdeembeddedno-std
crates.iopostcard-dyn0.2.11,1173382 days agocobsframingserdeembeddedno-std
crates.iopostcard-core0.1.04,2111225 days agoembeddedno-std
crates.iopostcard2-eio0.2.021226 days agoserdeembeddedno-std
crates.iopostcard-derive0.2.2454,7276382 days agocobsframingserdeembeddedno-std
crates.iopostcard-dyn-ng0.3.051417 days agocobsframingserdeembeddedno-std
crates.iopostcard-schema0.2.539,5567352 days agoserdeembeddedno-std

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

62Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 21 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence10/52 weeks with commits
12.9/18Commit volume26 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year26
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push21
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases27 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 226 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~21.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count27
latest_release_tagpostcard2/v0.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release226
mean_days_between_releases21.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

72Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
51.4/60Stars1,486 stars
17.9/25Forks140 forks
5.3/15Watchers10 watchers
Inputs used
forks140
stars1,486
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads6,893,044 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespostcard, postcard2, postcard-dyn, postcard-core, postcard2-eio, postcard-derive, postcard-dyn-ng, postcard-schema
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads55,074,772
monthly_downloads6,893,044
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 51% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth66 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled66
top_contributor_share0.506
How it's scored
25.7/42Issue resolution61% of issues closed
26/30PR acceptance129/149 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 8/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs129
open_issues50
closed_issues79
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.612
closed_unmerged_prs20
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
22/25Owner reach1,164 followers of jamesmunns
25/25Track record349 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,164
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginjamesmunns
public_repos349
account_age_days5,118
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable8 package(s) on crates
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 225 days ago
20/20Version history40 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespostcard, postcard2, postcard-dyn, postcard-core, postcard2-eio, postcard-derive, postcard-dyn-ng, postcard-schema
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish225

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests14 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/postcard
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/postcard
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests14 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 8/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
17.7/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: atomic-polyfill 1.0.3 (unknown), paste 1.0.15 (unknown)
34.8/40No advisories left outstanding2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,126 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages2
assessed_packages40
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 2
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the crates:postcard@1.1.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 40 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

48Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.1/40Legible commit history49 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.49
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, source/postcard-core/Cargo.toml, source/postcard-derive-ng/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, source/postcard-core/Cargo.toml, source/postcard-derive-ng/Cargo.toml, source/postcard-derive/Cargo.toml, source/postcard-dyn-ng/Cargo.toml, source/postcard-dyn/Cargo.toml, source/postcard-schema-ng/Cargo.toml, source/postcard-schema/Cargo.toml, source/postcard/Cargo.toml, source/postcard2-eio/Cargo.toml, source/postcard2-heapless/Cargo.toml, source/postcard2/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/88 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes29,106
source_files_sampled88
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,486GitHub stars
66contributors
26commits, last 12 months
21days since last push
27releases
1bus factor
50open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 140 ⇿
0Stars
140Forks
27Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012515014042019-082023-022026-08
Major 1Minor 0Patch 10

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-11 07:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests14 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 8/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 62
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iosyn2.0source/postcard-derive-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0source/postcard-derive-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0source/postcard-derive-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2.0source/postcard-derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0source/postcard-derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0source/postcard-derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.202source/postcard-dyn-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0.117source/postcard-dyn-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostcard1.0.10source/postcard-dyn-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostcard-schema-ng0.3source/postcard-dyn-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.202source/postcard-dyn/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0.117source/postcard-dyn/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostcard1.0.10source/postcard-dyn/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostcard-schema0.2source/postcard-dyn/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0source/postcard-schema-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid_v1_01.0source/postcard-schema-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono_v0_40.4source/postcard-schema-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheapless_v0_70.7source/postcard-schema-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheapless_v0_80.8source/postcard-schema-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheapless_v0_90.9source/postcard-schema-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.ionalgebra_v0_330.33.0source/postcard-schema-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.iofixed_v1_01.0source/postcard-schema-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostcard-derive-ng0.3.0source/postcard-schema-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.iodefmt_v0_30.3.5source/postcard-schema-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde-big-array_v0_50.5.1source/postcard-schema-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.ioenum-map_v3_03.0.0source/postcard-schema-ng/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0source/postcard-schema/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid_v1_01.0source/postcard-schema/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono_v0_40.4source/postcard-schema/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheapless_v0_70.7source/postcard-schema/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheapless_v0_80.8source/postcard-schema/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheapless_v0_90.9source/postcard-schema/Cargo.toml
crates.ionalgebra_v0_330.33.0source/postcard-schema/Cargo.toml
crates.ionalgebra_v0_340.34.1source/postcard-schema/Cargo.toml
crates.iofixed_v1_01.0source/postcard-schema/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostcard-derive0.2.0source/postcard-schema/Cargo.toml
crates.iodefmt_v0_30.3.5source/postcard-schema/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde-big-array_v0_50.5.1source/postcard-schema/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheapless0.7.0source/postcard/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheapless-v0_80.8.0source/postcard/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheapless-v0_90.9.1source/postcard/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.100source/postcard/Cargo.toml
crates.iocobs0.3.0source/postcard/Cargo.toml
crates.iodefmt1source/postcard/Cargo.toml
crates.ioembedded-io-040.4source/postcard/Cargo.toml
crates.ioembedded-io-060.6source/postcard/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostcard-derive0.2.0source/postcard/Cargo.toml
crates.iocrc3.0.1source/postcard/Cargo.toml
crates.ionalgebra_v0_330.33.0source/postcard/Cargo.toml
crates.ioenum-map-v3_03.0.0source/postcard/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostcard20.2.0source/postcard2-eio/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228source/postcard2-eio/Cargo.toml
crates.ioembedded_io_v0_70.7.1source/postcard2-eio/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostcard20.2.0source/postcard2-heapless/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228source/postcard2-heapless/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheapless_v0_90.9.1source/postcard2-heapless/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostcard-core0.1.0source/postcard2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228source/postcard2/Cargo.toml
crates.iodefmt1source/postcard2/Cargo.toml
crates.iopostcard-derive-ng0.3.0source/postcard2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228source/postcard2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.228source/postcard2/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 26

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 8 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iocobsdirect
crates.iocrcdirect
crates.iodefmtdirect
crates.ioheaplessdirect
crates.iopostcarddirect
crates.iopostcard-coredirect
crates.iopostcard-derivedirect
crates.iopostcard-derive-ngdirect
crates.iopostcard-schemadirect
crates.iopostcard-schema-ngdirect
crates.iopostcard2direct
crates.ioproc-macro2direct
crates.ioquotedirect
crates.ioserdedirect
crates.ioserde_coredirect
crates.ioserde_derivedirect
crates.ioserde_jsondirect
crates.iosyndirect
crates.iochronoindirect
crates.iocriterionindirect
crates.ioembedded-ioindirect
crates.ioenum-mapindirect
crates.iofixedindirect
crates.ionalgebraindirect
crates.ioserde-big-arrayindirect
crates.iouuidindirect
Dependency advisories 2

Installing crates:postcard@1.1.3 pulls in 40 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
atomic-polyfill1.0.3indirectunknown1
paste1.0.15indirectunknown1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.