Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-08 20:22 UTC

juaml / junifer

Forschungszentrum Jülich Neuroimaging Feature Extractor

PythonAGPL-3.0★ 16 stars⑂ 13 forkssince Jan 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#feature-extraction#fmri#neuroimaging#python

juaml/junifer holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (46/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

JuamlOrganization
30 followers43 public repossince Oct 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIjunifer0.0.72,088324218 days agoneuroimaging

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

81Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence — 24/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 360 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year360
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year24

Release discipline

56Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 7 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 218 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~178.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count7
latest_release_tagv0.0.7
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release218
mean_days_between_releases178.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

31At Risk
How it's scored
19.1/60Stars — 16 stars
9/25Forks — 13 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks13
stars16
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

57Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

55Moderate
How it's scored
44.3/80Monthly downloads — 2,088 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesjunifer
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,088
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 82% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 11 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled11
top_contributor_share0.823

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good
How it's scored
34.3/42Issue resolution — 82% of issues closed
27.9/30PR acceptance — 396/426 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs396
open_issues16
closed_issues71
prs_merged_7d7
prs_decided_7d7
prs_merged_30d8
prs_decided_30d8
issue_closed_ratio0.816
closed_unmerged_prs30
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

65Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
10.7/25Owner reach — 30 followers of juaml
23.9/25Track record — 43 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers30
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginjuaml
public_repos43
account_age_days2,171

Package maintenance

91Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 218 days ago
20/20Version history — 324 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesjunifer
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish218

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), tox.ini
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://juaml.github.io/junifer
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsfeature-extraction, fmri, neuroimaging, python
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://juaml.github.io/junifer
docs_sitehttps://juaml.github.io/junifer
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

54Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0.5/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: InProgress
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages77
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:junifer@0.0.7 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 77 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

19Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
19.4/40Legible commit history — 35 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.365
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

90Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile, justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), tox.ini
11/11Static type checking — junifer/api/py.typed, junifer/api/queue_context/py.typed, junifer/cli/py.typed, junifer/configs/juseless/datagrabbers/py.typed, junifer/configs/juseless/py.typed, junifer/configs/py.typed, junifer/data/py.typed, junifer/datagrabber/aomic/py.typed, junifer/datagrabber/hcp1200/py.typed, junifer/datagrabber/py.typed, junifer/datareader/py.typed, junifer/external/nilearn/py.typed, junifer/external/py.typed, junifer/markers/complexity/py.typed, junifer/markers/falff/py.typed, junifer/markers/functional_connectivity/py.typed, junifer/markers/py.typed, junifer/markers/reho/py.typed, junifer/markers/temporal_snr/py.typed, junifer/onthefly/py.typed, junifer/pipeline/py.typed, junifer/preprocess/confounds/py.typed, junifer/preprocess/py.typed, junifer/preprocess/smoothing/py.typed, junifer/preprocess/warping/py.typed, junifer/py.typed, junifer/storage/py.typed, junifer/testing/py.typed, junifer/typing/py.typed, junifer/utils/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 17 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocs/Makefile, justfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsjunifer/api/py.typed, junifer/api/queue_context/py.typed, junifer/cli/py.typed, junifer/configs/juseless/datagrabbers/py.typed, junifer/configs/juseless/py.typed, junifer/configs/py.typed, junifer/data/py.typed, junifer/datagrabber/aomic/py.typed, junifer/datagrabber/hcp1200/py.typed, junifer/datagrabber/py.typed, junifer/datareader/py.typed, junifer/external/nilearn/py.typed, junifer/external/py.typed, junifer/markers/complexity/py.typed, junifer/markers/falff/py.typed, junifer/markers/functional_connectivity/py.typed, junifer/markers/py.typed, junifer/markers/reho/py.typed, junifer/markers/temporal_snr/py.typed, junifer/onthefly/py.typed, junifer/pipeline/py.typed, junifer/preprocess/confounds/py.typed, junifer/preprocess/py.typed, junifer/preprocess/smoothing/py.typed, junifer/preprocess/warping/py.typed, junifer/py.typed, junifer/storage/py.typed, junifer/testing/py.typed, junifer/typing/py.typed, junifer/utils/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.17
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (junifer/api/py.typed, junifer/api/queue_context/py.typed, junifer/cli/py.typed, junifer/configs/juseless/datagrabbers/py.typed, junifer/configs/juseless/py.typed, junifer/configs/py.typed, junifer/data/py.typed, junifer/datagrabber/aomic/py.typed, junifer/datagrabber/hcp1200/py.typed, junifer/datagrabber/py.typed, junifer/datareader/py.typed, junifer/external/nilearn/py.typed, junifer/external/py.typed, junifer/markers/complexity/py.typed, junifer/markers/falff/py.typed, junifer/markers/functional_connectivity/py.typed, junifer/markers/py.typed, junifer/markers/reho/py.typed, junifer/markers/temporal_snr/py.typed, junifer/onthefly/py.typed, junifer/pipeline/py.typed, junifer/preprocess/confounds/py.typed, junifer/preprocess/py.typed, junifer/preprocess/smoothing/py.typed, junifer/preprocess/warping/py.typed, junifer/py.typed, junifer/storage/py.typed, junifer/testing/py.typed, junifer/typing/py.typed, junifer/utils/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/272 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes57,077
source_files_sampled272
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

16GitHub stars
11contributors
360commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
7releases
1bus factor
16open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 13 ⇿
0Stars
13Forks
3Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111212131313112022-092023-052023-12
Major 0Minor 0Patch 3

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-08 20:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
2CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: InProgress
0Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIclick>=8.1.3,<8.6pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=1.26.0,<2.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIscipy>=1.10.0,<1.18.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdatalad>=1.0.0,<1.8.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas>=2.0.0,<3.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPInibabel>=5.2.0,<5.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPInilearn>=0.14.0,<0.15pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy>=2.0.25,<2.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIruamel.yaml>=0.17,<0.20pyproject.toml
PyPIh5py>=3.10pyproject.toml
PyPItqdm>=4.66.1,<4.71.0pyproject.toml
PyPItemplateflow>=23.0.0,<26.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlapy>=1.0.0,<2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlazy_loader>=0.4,<0.7pyproject.toml
PyPIlooseversion==1.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIjunifer-data>=1.6.1pyproject.toml
PyPIstructlog>=25.0.0,<27.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.11.4pyproject.toml
PyPIaenum>=3.1.0,<3.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPItyping_extensions>=4.15.0,<4.17.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 187

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 167 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaenum3.1.17direct
PyPIclick8.5.0direct
PyPIdatalad1.7.1direct
PyPIh5py3.16.0direct
PyPIjunifer-data1.6.1direct
PyPIlapy1.6.0direct
PyPIlazy-loader0.6direct
PyPIlooseversion1.3.0direct
PyPInibabel5.4.2direct
PyPInilearn0.14.1direct
PyPInumpy2.4.6direct
PyPIpandas3.0.6direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.5direct
PyPIruamel-yaml0.19.1direct
PyPIscipy1.17.1direct
PyPIsqlalchemy2.1.4direct
PyPIstructlog26.1.0direct
PyPItemplateflow25.1.2direct
PyPItqdm4.70.1direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0direct
PyPIaccessible-pygments0.0.5indirect
PyPIacres0.5.0indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIannexremote1.6.6indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIapeye1.4.1indirect
PyPIapeye-core1.1.5indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.2indirect
PyPIautodoc-pydantic2.2.0indirect
PyPIautodocsumm0.2.15indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbctpy0.6.1indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIbids-validator1.14.7.post0indirect
PyPIbidsschematools2.0.0indirect
PyPIboto31.43.109indirect
PyPIbotocore1.43.109indirect
PyPIcachecontrol0.14.4indirect
PyPIcachetools7.2.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIchardet7.6.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.2indirect
PyPIcloudpickle3.1.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.4.0indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.2indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdict2css0.6.0indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocopt0.6.2indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIdomdf-python-tools3.10.0indirect
PyPIenum-tools0.13.0indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfasteners0.20indirect
PyPIfilelock4.0.12indirect
PyPIfonttools4.66.1indirect
PyPIformulaic1.2.2indirect
PyPIfrozendict2.4.7indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.9.0indirect
PyPIfuro2025.12.19indirect
PyPIgiturlparse0.15.0indirect
PyPIhtml5lib1.1indirect
PyPIhumanize4.16.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.20indirect
PyPIidna3.20indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.1indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.1indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources7.1.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.1indirect
PyPIinterface-meta2.0.1indirect
PyPIipython9.17.1indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIiso86012.1.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.20.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjoblib1.6.0indirect
PyPIjulearn0.3.5indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIkeyrings-alt5.0.2indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.5.1indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.4indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.11.2indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImsgpack1.2.3indirect
PyPInarwhals2.26.0indirect
PyPInatsort8.4.0indirect
PyPIneurokit20.2.12indirect
PyPInodeenv1.11.0indirect
PyPInum2words0.5.14indirect
PyPInumpydoc1.11.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpathlib-abc0.5.2indirect
PyPIpatool4.0.7indirect
PyPIpatool4.1.0indirect
PyPIpatsy1.0.3indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.12.4indirect
PyPIplotly7.1.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.53indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.4indirect
PyPIpybids0.22.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.15.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.3indirect
PyPIpyproject-api1.11.4indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.1indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.4indirect
PyPIpython-gitlab8.6.0indirect
PyPIpywavelets1.10.0indirect
PyPIpywavelets1.9.0indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIroman5.2indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIroman-numerals-py4.1.0indirect
PyPIruff0.16.10indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.19.2indirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.8.0indirect
PyPIseaborn0.13.2indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools84.0.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools-scm10.3.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.10indirect
PyPIsphinx8.2.3indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-basic-ng1.0.0b2indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton0.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-gallery0.22.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-jinja2-compat0.4.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-polyversion3.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-prompt1.10.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-tabs3.5.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-toolbox4.3.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-mermaid2.1.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-towncrier0.5.0a0indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIstandard-imghdr3.10.14indirect
PyPIstatsmodels0.14.6indirect
PyPItabulate0.10.0indirect
PyPIthreadpoolctl3.7.0indirect
PyPItinycss21.5.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItowncrier26.9.0indirect
PyPItox4.64.9indirect
PyPItraitlets5.16.1indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPItzdata2026.5indirect
PyPIuniversal-pathlib0.3.10indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIvcs-versioning2.6.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.14.5indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.9.2indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.6.1indirect
PyPIwrapt2.5.0indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:junifer@0.0.7 pulls in 77 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with juaml/junifer. Read them side by side →

98mne-tools/mne-pythonMNE: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and Electroencephalography (EEG) in PythonExceptional97Slicer/SlicerMulti-platform, free open source software for visualization and image computing.Exceptional100psf/blackThe uncompromising Python code formatterExceptional100astropy/astropyAstronomy and astrophysics core libraryExceptional100scikit-learn/scikit-learnscikit-learn: machine learning in PythonExceptional100PrefectHQ/prefectPrefect is a workflow orchestration framework for building resilient data pipelines in Python.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.