Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-07 17:08 UTC

lcobucci / jwt-rsassa-pss

RSA-PSS implementation for lcobucci/jwt

PHPMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2024View on GitHub ↗

lcobucci/jwt-rsassa-pss holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (82/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (29/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Luís CobucciPersonal account
1,121 followers82 public repossince Feb 2010@mollie

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistlcobucci/jwt-rsassa-pss1.1.02,0152276 days agojwt

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
32.5/36Commit cadence47/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume163 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year163
human_commit_share0.1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year47
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases2 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 276 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~290.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tag1.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release276
mean_days_between_releases290.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

29At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
44.1/80Monthly downloads2,015 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packageslcobucci/jwt-rsassa-pss
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads32,840
monthly_downloads2,015
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 62% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.618
How it's scored
21/42Issue resolution50% of issues closed
28.8/30PR acceptance23/24 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs23
open_issues1
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.5
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
21.9/25Owner reach1,121 followers of lcobucci
25/25Track record82 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,121
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginlcobucci
public_repos82
account_age_days6,020
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 276 days ago
12/20Version history2 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslcobucci/jwt-rsassa-pss
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish276

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

57Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages74
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 74 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

40Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance90 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/9 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes6,996
source_files_sampled9
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
3contributors
163commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
2releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-07 17:08 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistlcobucci/jwt^5.4.2composer.json
All dependencies 74

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 73 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistlcobucci/jwt5.6.0direct
Packagistcolinodell/json53.0.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.3.2indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer1.2.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/coding-standard14.0.0indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistinfection/abstract-testframework-adapter0.5.0indirect
Packagistinfection/extension-installer0.1.2indirect
Packagistinfection/include-interceptor0.2.5indirect
Packagistinfection/infection0.34.2indirect
Packagistinfection/mutator0.4.1indirect
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema6.8.0indirect
Packagistlcobucci/coding-standard12.0.0indirect
Packagistmarc-mabe/php-enum4.7.2indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.7.0indirect
Packagistondram/ci-detector4.2.0indirect
Packagistparagonie/constant_time_encoding3.1.3indirect
Packagistparagonie/random_compat9.99.100indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpseclib/phpseclib3.0.56indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer1.4.3indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.2indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.2.7indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-deprecation-rules2.0.5indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit2.0.18indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-strict-rules2.0.12indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage14.1.5indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator7.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker7.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer9.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit13.1.7indirect
Packagistpsr/clock1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistsanmai/di-container0.1.17indirect
Packagistsanmai/duoclock0.1.3indirect
Packagistsanmai/later0.1.7indirect
Packagistsanmai/pipeline7.9indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator8.1.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity6.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff8.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment9.3.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter8.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/git-state1.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state9.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator8.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector6.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context8.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/type7.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version7.0.0indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard8.28.1indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer4.0.1indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/console8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php851.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.6.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string8.0.8indirect
Packagistthecodingmachine/safe3.4.0indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer2.0.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert2.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 74 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
squizlabs/php_codesniffer4.0.1indirecthigh14.0.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.