Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 20:18 UTC

logicalclocks / hopsworks-api

Python SDK to interact with the Hopsworks API

Python · JavaApache-2.0★ 16 stars⑂ 31 forkssince Nov 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

logicalclocks/hopsworks-api holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Security (16/100). It was last updated today. 5 contributors account for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

HopsworksOrganization · verified domain
151 followers128 public repossince Mar 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence — 49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 344 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year344
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year49

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 27 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~4.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count27
latest_release_tag5.1.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases4.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
19.1/60Stars — 16 stars
12.3/25Forks — 31 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks31
stars16
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
64.8/80Monthly downloads — 72,831 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageshopsworks
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads72,831
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

91Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
45.9/54Bus factor — 5 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 16% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 32 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor5
contributors_sampled32
top_contributor_share0.164
How it's scored
35.9/42Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
27.2/30PR acceptance — 1,074/1,183 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs1,074
open_issues6
closed_issues35
prs_merged_7d24
prs_decided_7d24
prs_merged_30d59
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.854
closed_unmerged_prs109
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
15.7/25Owner reach — 151 followers of logicalclocks
25/25Track record — 128 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers151
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginlogicalclocks
public_repos128
account_age_days3,490

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history — 145 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageshopsworks
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

91Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.hopsworks.ai/latest
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.hopsworks.ai/latest
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

16Critical · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles—
manifestsjava/pom.xml, locust_benchmark/requirements.txt, python/pyproject.toml
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
How it's scored
10.4/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: fsspec 2025.10.0 (high 8.8)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages1
assessed_packages43
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the pypi:hopsworks@5.2.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 43 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .claude/CLAUDE.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, python/hopsworks/cli/templates/AGENTS.md, python/hopsworks/skills/data/hops-analytics/references/bronze_template/AGENTS.md, python/hopsworks/skills/data/hops-analytics/references/gold_template/AGENTS.md, python/hopsworks/skills/data/hops-analytics/references/silver_template/AGENTS.md, python/hopsworks/skills/ml/hops-reqs/references/system_template/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 97 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.97
agent_instruction_files.claude/CLAUDE.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, python/hopsworks/cli/templates/AGENTS.md, python/hopsworks/skills/data/hops-analytics/references/bronze_template/AGENTS.md, python/hopsworks/skills/data/hops-analytics/references/gold_template/AGENTS.md, python/hopsworks/skills/data/hops-analytics/references/silver_template/AGENTS.md, python/hopsworks/skills/ml/hops-reqs/references/system_template/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,094
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — java/beam/pom.xml, java/flink/pom.xml, java/hsfs/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 92 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.92
toolchain_manifestsjava/beam/pom.xml, java/flink/pom.xml, java/hsfs/pom.xml, java/pom.xml, java/spark/pom.xml, utils/java/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
52.8/55Manageable file sizes — 37/905 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes441,747
source_files_sampled905
oversized_source_files37
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — python/hopsworks_common/client/istio/grpc/proto/grpc_predict_v2.proto
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsnotebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filespython/hopsworks_common/client/istio/grpc/proto/grpc_predict_v2.proto
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

16GitHub stars
32contributors
344commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
27releases
5bus factor
6open issues
Maven, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 31 ⇿
0Stars
31Forks
14Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383122022-032024-052026-07
Major 1Minor 3Patch 6

Each point covers 4 days.

Direct dependencies 31
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenio.netty:netty-bom4.2.17.Finaljava/pom.xml
Mavenorg.projectlombok:lombok${lombok.version}java/pom.xml
Mavencom.damnhandy:handy-uri-templates${handy.version}java/pom.xml
Mavenorg.json:json${json.version}java/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-text${commons-text.version}java/pom.xml
PyPIpyhumps==1.6.1python/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests—python/pyproject.toml
PyPIurllib3>=1.26,<3python/pyproject.toml
PyPIfurl—python/pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3—python/pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas<2.4.0python/pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=1.26.3,<2.5.0python/pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography—python/pyproject.toml
PyPImock—python/pyproject.toml
PyPIavro==1.12.0python/pyproject.toml
PyPIPyMySQL—python/pyproject.toml
PyPItzlocal—python/pyproject.toml
PyPIfsspec<2025.12.0python/pyproject.toml
PyPIretrying—python/pyproject.toml
PyPIhopsworks_aiomysql==0.2.4python/pyproject.toml
PyPIopensearch-py>=1.1.0,<4python/pyproject.toml
PyPItqdm—python/pyproject.toml
PyPIgrpcio>=1.49.1,<2.0.0python/pyproject.toml
PyPIprotobuf>=4.25.4,<7.0.0python/pyproject.toml
PyPIpackaging—python/pyproject.toml
PyPIhopsworks-apigen>=1.0.4,<2.0.0python/pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.1python/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml—python/pyproject.toml
PyPItomli>=2.0python/pyproject.toml
PyPItomli-w>=1.0python/pyproject.toml
PyPIbuild—python/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 97

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 31 direct and 66 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.damnhandy:handy-uri-templates2.1.8direct
Mavenio.netty:netty-bom4.2.17direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-text1.13.1direct
Mavenorg.json:json20231013direct
Mavenorg.projectlombok:lombok1.18.36direct
PyPIavro1.12.0direct
PyPIboto3—direct
PyPIbuild—direct
PyPIclick—direct
PyPIcryptography—direct
PyPIfsspec—direct
PyPIfurl—direct
PyPIgrpcio—direct
PyPIhopsworks-aiomysql—direct
PyPIhopsworks-apigen—direct
PyPImock—direct
PyPInumpy—direct
PyPIopensearch-py—direct
PyPIpackaging—direct
PyPIpandas—direct
PyPIprotobuf—direct
PyPIpyhumps1.6.1direct
PyPIpymysql—direct
PyPIpyyaml—direct
PyPIrequests—direct
PyPIretrying—direct
PyPItomli—direct
PyPItomli-w—direct
PyPItqdm—direct
PyPItzlocal—direct
PyPIurllib3—direct
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind—indirect
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.13.4.2indirect
Mavencom.google.guava:guava14.0.1indirect
Mavencom.google.guava:guava30.1.1-jreindirect
Mavencom.logicalclocks:hsfs5.3.0-SNAPSHOTindirect
Mavencom.logicalclocks:hsfs-spark-spark4.1—indirect
Mavencom.zaxxer:HikariCP4.0.3indirect
Mavencommons-cli:commons-cli1.10.0indirect
Mavencommons-io:commons-io2.11.0indirect
Mavenio.hops:hadoop-client3.4.3.3-EE-RC1indirect
Mavenio.specto:hoverfly-java0.12.2indirect
Mavenjavax.xml.bind:jaxb-api2.2.11indirect
Mavenlog4j:log4j1.2.17indirect
Mavenmysql:mysql-connector-java8.0.33indirect
Mavenorg.apache.avro:avro—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-core2.48.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-io-kafka2.48.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.flink:flink-avro1.17.1.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.flink:flink-connector-kafka1.17.1.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.flink:flink-streaming-java1.17.1.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient4.5.6indirect
Mavenorg.apache.httpcomponents:httpcore4.4.13indirect
Mavenorg.apache.kafka:kafka-clients3.4.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.kafka:kafka-clients3.9.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin2.4.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-checkstyle-plugin3.1.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin3.5.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin2.22.0indirect
Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk18on1.81.1indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api5.9.1indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine5.9.1indirect
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-core4.3.1indirect
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-inline4.3.1indirect
Mavenorg.projectlombok:lombok-maven-plugin1.18.20.0indirect
Mavenorg.scala-lang:scala-library—indirect
Mavenorg.scala-tools:maven-scala-plugin2.15.2indirect
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api2.0.17indirect
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-log4j122.0.17indirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:secretsmanager—indirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:ssm—indirect
Mavensoftware.amazon.awssdk:sts—indirect
npmtrino-client0.2.9indirect
PyPIcatboost1.2.10indirect
PyPIfaker38.2.0indirect
PyPIfastapi0.141.1indirect
PyPIgeoip25.2.0indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub2.0.0indirect
PyPIjoblib1.5.3indirect
PyPIlangchain-openai1.6.2indirect
PyPIlocust2.23.1indirect
PyPImarkupsafe2.0.1indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPIodfpy1.4.1indirect
PyPIopeninference-instrumentation-langchain0.1.76indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http1.45.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk1.45.0indirect
PyPIpypdf6.19.0indirect
PyPIpython-docx1.2.0indirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.6.1indirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.8.0indirect
PyPIsentence-transformers6.1.0indirect
PyPIstructured-data-models—indirect
PyPItorch2.14.1+cpuindirect
PyPItrino0.336.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.52.4indirect
PyPIxgboost2.1.4indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing pypi:hopsworks@5.2.1 pulls in 43 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
fsspec2025.10.0directhigh22026.6.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.