Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 12:02 UTC

manishiitg / mcp-agent-builder-go

AgentWorks: the open-source control plane for running, measuring, and improving AI agent workflows across your company.

Go · TypeScriptNo license detected★ 6 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Oct 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceWeb interfaceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

manishiitg/mcp-agent-builder-go holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (21/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ManishPersonal account
84 followers46 public repossince Jan 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
27/36Commit cadence39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume2,293 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year2,293
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year39
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.25.125
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

21At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
11.3/60Stars6 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars6
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

43Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
27.7/42Issue resolution66% of issues closed
29.1/30PR acceptance133/137 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs133
open_issues14
closed_issues27
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.659
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
13.9/25Owner reach84 followers of manishiitg
24.2/25Track record46 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers84
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginmanishiitg
public_repos46
account_age_days5,288
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml, eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://agentworkshq.com/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics15 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagent-framework, agent-orchestration, ai-agents, automation, coding-agents, golang, llm, mcp, model-context-protocol, multi-agent, workflow-engine, workflow-automation, ai-workflows, claude-code, codex
has_wikino
homepagehttps://agentworkshq.com/
docs_sitehttps://agentworkshq.com/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

36Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingno data
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities132 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Fuzzing. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapagent_go/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml, eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checkingfrontend/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesagent_go/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsfrontend/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
51.9/55Manageable file sizes66/1,167 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes3,783,665
source_files_sampled1,167
oversized_source_files66
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

6GitHub stars
1contributors
2,293commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
14open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/agent_go' from its registry
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/workspace' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-16 12:02 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
n/aFuzzinginternal error: internal error: Client.Search.Code: io.ReadAll: stream error: stream ID 1; INTERNAL_ERROR; received from peer
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities132 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 70
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/PaesslerAG/jsonpathv0.1.1agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/anthropics/anthropic-sdk-gov1.43.0agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.17agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/bedrockruntimev1.50.6agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/creack/ptyv1.1.24agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5v5.2.1agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/muxv1.8.1agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/invopop/jsonschemav0.13.0agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/manishiitg/coding-agent-loop/workspacev0.0.0agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/manishiitg/mcpagentv1.7.12-0.20260716090748-9a3a6c84627aagent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/manishiitg/multi-llm-provider-gov0.7.4-0.20260716090415-37555ec848b5agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/mark3labs/mcp-gov0.45.0agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/openai/openai-go/v3v3.36.0agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/robfig/cron/v3v3.0.1agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/skip2/go-qrcodev0.0.0-20200617195104-da1b6568686eagent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/slack-go/slackv0.17.3agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.1agent_go/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0agent_go/go.mod
Gogo.mau.fi/whatsmeowv0.0.0-20260421083005-5b8886176ff7agent_go/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.55.0agent_go/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genaiv1.57.0agent_go/go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1agent_go/go.mod
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.49.1agent_go/go.mod
npmdetect-port^1.5.1desktop/package.json
npm@fontsource/jetbrains-mono^5.2.8frontend/package.json
npm@monaco-editor/react^4.6.0frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-accordion^1.2.11frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-checkbox^1.3.2frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-label^2.1.7frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-select^2.2.5frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-slot^1.2.3frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tooltip^1.2.8frontend/package.json
npm@tailwindcss/vite^4.1.11frontend/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.81.5frontend/package.json
npm@types/dagre^0.7.53frontend/package.json
npm@types/node^24.0.10frontend/package.json
npm@xterm/addon-fit^0.11.0frontend/package.json
npm@xterm/xterm^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@xyflow/react^12.9.3frontend/package.json
npmajv^8.17.1frontend/package.json
npmansi_up^6.0.6frontend/package.json
npmaxios^1.10.0frontend/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1frontend/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1frontend/package.json
npmcronstrue^2.59.0frontend/package.json
npmdagre^0.8.5frontend/package.json
npmlodash.debounce^4.0.8frontend/package.json
npmlucide-react^0.525.0frontend/package.json
npmmammoth^1.11.0frontend/package.json
npmmermaid^11.12.2frontend/package.json
npmmonaco-editor^0.45.0frontend/package.json
npmpapaparse^5.5.3frontend/package.json
npmreact^19.1.1frontend/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.1.1frontend/package.json
npmreact-markdown^10.1.0frontend/package.json
npmreact-syntax-highlighter^15.5.0frontend/package.json
npmreact-virtuoso^4.18.1frontend/package.json
npmrecharts^3.8.1frontend/package.json
npmremark-gfm^4.0.1frontend/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^2.6.0frontend/package.json
npmxlsx^0.18.5frontend/package.json
npmzustand^5.0.8frontend/package.json
Gogithub.com/gin-contrib/gzipv1.2.6workspace/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gin-gonic/ginv1.12.0workspace/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.1workspace/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0workspace/go.mod
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.49.1workspace/go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.