Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 17:28 UTC

mjwsolo / localcode

High-performance AI coding on consumer hardware

C++ · C · PythonApache-2.0★ 6 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolMCP serverTerminal interfacehow this is determined

mjwsolo/localcode holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (92/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (45/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

thecchefPersonal account
7 followers7 public repossince May 2016

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIlocalcode0.3.714,1438817 days agoaiclicoding-assistantgemmalocal-firsttui

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

72Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 349 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year349
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year15

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 55 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 17 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count55
latest_release_tagv0.3.71
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release17
mean_days_between_releases0.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

11Critical
How it's scored
11.3/60Stars — 6 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars6
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

60Moderate
How it's scored
48.2/80Monthly downloads — 4,143 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageslocalcode
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads4,143
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

45Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

12Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

41Weak
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed
29.6/30PR acceptance — 69/70 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs69
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

44Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
6.5/25Owner reach — 7 followers of mjwsolo
18.6/25Track record — 7 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers7
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmjwsolo
public_repos7
account_age_days3,759
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 17 days ago
20/20Version history — 88 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslocalcode
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish17

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .flake8, eslint.config.js, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://mjwsolo.github.io/localcode/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://mjwsolo.github.io/localcode/
docs_sitehttps://mjwsolo.github.io/localcode/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
25/25Dependency lockfiles — package-lock.json, uv.lock
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
manifestsllama-cpp-turboquant/pyproject.toml, llama-cpp-turboquant/requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, setup.py, website/package.json
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyyes
has_dependabot_configno

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages62
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:localcode@0.3.71 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 62 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

87Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — llama-cpp-turboquant/AGENTS.md, llama-cpp-turboquant/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 93 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.93
agent_instruction_filesllama-cpp-turboquant/AGENTS.md, llama-cpp-turboquant/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes12,170

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

80Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — llama-cpp-turboquant/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .flake8, eslint.config.js, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — llama-cpp-turboquant/gguf-py/gguf/py.typed, llama-cpp-turboquant/mypy.ini, llama-cpp-turboquant/pyrightconfig.json, llama-cpp-turboquant/tools/ui/tsconfig.json, website/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesllama-cpp-turboquant/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsllama-cpp-turboquant/gguf-py/gguf/py.typed, llama-cpp-turboquant/mypy.ini, llama-cpp-turboquant/pyrightconfig.json, llama-cpp-turboquant/tools/ui/tsconfig.json, website/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

97Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C++ (statically typed)
51.7/55Manageable file sizes — 106/1,786 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC++
largest_source_bytes1,208,912
source_files_sampled1,786
oversized_source_files106

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

6GitHub stars
1contributors
349commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
55releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'llama-cpp-scripts' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 32
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPInumpy(>=1.26.4,<3.0.0)llama-cpp-turboquant/pyproject.toml
PyPIsentencepiece(>=0.1.98,<0.3.0)llama-cpp-turboquant/pyproject.toml
PyPItransformers(==4.57.6)llama-cpp-turboquant/pyproject.toml
PyPIprotobuf(>=4.21.0,<5.0.0)llama-cpp-turboquant/pyproject.toml
PyPItorch(>=2.6.0,<3.0.0)llama-cpp-turboquant/pyproject.toml
PyPIgguf@ ./gguf-pyllama-cpp-turboquant/pyproject.toml
PyPIcertifi>=2024.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIddgs>=9.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhf_xet>=1.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.27.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhuggingface_hub>=1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIjedi>=0.19.0pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=1.28.0pyproject.toml
PyPIprompt_toolkit>=3.0.52pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=13.7.1pyproject.toml
PyPIscikit-learn>=1.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPItextual>=8.2.4pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter>=0.23.0pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-language-pack>=1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPItomli>=2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpywhispercpp>=1.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIsounddevice>=0.4.6pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=1.26.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpiper-tts>=1.2.0pyproject.toml
npm@astrojs/starlight^0.41.7website/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/instrument-sans^5.3.0website/package.json
npm@fontsource/commit-mono^5.3.0website/package.json
npm@fontsource/geist-mono^5.3.0website/package.json
npm@fontsource/inter^5.3.0website/package.json
npm@fontsource/martian-mono^5.3.0website/package.json
npmastro^7.2.3website/package.json
npmsharp^0.35.3website/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:localcode@0.3.71 pulls in 62 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with mjwsolo/localcode. Read them side by side →

99awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional96onyx-dot-app/onyxOpen Source AI Platform - AI Chat with advanced features that works with every LLMExceptional98google-gemini/gemini-cliAn open-source AI agent that brings the power of Gemini directly into your terminal.Exceptional98deepnote/deepnoteDeepnote is a drop-in replacement for Jupyter with an AI-first design, sleek UI, new blocks, and native data integrations. Use Python, R, and SQL locally in your favorite IDE, then scale to Deepnote cloud for real-time collaboration, Deepnote agent, and deployable data apps. https://deepnote.com/Exceptional98n8n-io/n8nFair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.Exceptional97mckinsey/agents-at-scale-arkProvider-agnostic operations for agentic resources. ARK codifies patterns and practices developed across dozens of agentic application projects.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.