Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 01:38 UTC

mozilla-mobile / android-components

⚠️ This project moved to a new repository. It is now developed and maintained at: https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/firefox-android

KotlinMPL-2.0★ 1,990 stars⑂ 474 forkssince Mar 2018archivedView on GitHub ↗
KindMobile applicationhow this is determined

mozilla-mobile/android-components holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (87/100) and lowest on Vitality (25/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Mozilla MobileOrganization
1,045 followers83 public repossince Sep 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

25At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 1,410 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push1,410
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,414 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv107.0.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,414
mean_days_between_releases3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

87Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
53.5/60Stars — 1,990 stars
22.3/25Forks — 474 forks
6.4/15Watchers — 15 watchers
Inputs used
forks474
stars1,990
watchers15
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MPL-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 19% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 36 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.191
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
26.7/30PR acceptance — 7,552/8,494 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 16/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs7,552
open_issues1
closed_issues4,443
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs942
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
21.7/25Owner reach — 1,045 followers of mozilla-mobile
25/25Track record — 83 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,045
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmozilla-mobile
public_repos83
account_age_days3,641

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/firefox-android
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsandroid, components, browser, mozilla, kotlin
has_wikino
homepagehttps://github.com/mozilla-mobile/firefox-android
docs_sitehttps://github.com/mozilla-mobile/firefox-android
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 16/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 36 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project is archived
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 59 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories77
affected_packages12
assessed_packages109
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 10, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 109 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

65Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
17.4/40Legible commit history — 32 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.327
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — build.gradle, buildSrc/build.gradle, components/browser/domains/build.gradle (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc.js
11/11Static type checking — Kotlin (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsbuild.gradle, buildSrc/build.gradle, components/browser/domains/build.gradle, components/browser/engine-gecko/build.gradle, components/browser/engine-system/build.gradle, components/browser/errorpages/build.gradle, components/browser/icons/build.gradle, components/browser/menu/build.gradle, components/browser/menu2/build.gradle, components/browser/session-storage/build.gradle, components/browser/state/build.gradle, components/browser/storage-sync/build.gradle, components/browser/tabstray/build.gradle, components/browser/thumbnails/build.gradle, components/browser/toolbar/build.gradle, components/compose/awesomebar/build.gradle, components/compose/browser-toolbar/build.gradle, components/compose/cfr/build.gradle, components/compose/engine/build.gradle, components/compose/tabstray/build.gradle, components/concept/awesomebar/build.gradle, components/concept/base/build.gradle, components/concept/engine/build.gradle, components/concept/fetch/build.gradle, components/concept/menu/build.gradle, components/concept/push/build.gradle, components/concept/storage/build.gradle, components/concept/sync/build.gradle, components/concept/tabstray/build.gradle, components/concept/toolbar/build.gradle, components/feature/accounts-push/build.gradle, components/feature/accounts/build.gradle, components/feature/addons/build.gradle, components/feature/app-links/build.gradle, components/feature/autofill/build.gradle, components/feature/awesomebar/build.gradle, components/feature/containers/build.gradle, components/feature/contextmenu/build.gradle, components/feature/customtabs/build.gradle, components/feature/downloads/build.gradle, components/feature/findinpage/build.gradle, components/feature/intent/build.gradle, components/feature/logins/build.gradle, components/feature/media/build.gradle, components/feature/privatemode/build.gradle, components/feature/prompts/build.gradle, components/feature/push/build.gradle, components/feature/pwa/build.gradle, components/feature/qr/build.gradle, components/feature/readerview/build.gradle, components/feature/recentlyclosed/build.gradle, components/feature/search/build.gradle, components/feature/serviceworker/build.gradle, components/feature/session/build.gradle, components/feature/share/build.gradle, components/feature/sitepermissions/build.gradle, components/feature/syncedtabs/build.gradle, components/feature/tab-collections/build.gradle, components/feature/tabs/build.gradle, components/feature/toolbar/build.gradle, components/feature/top-sites/build.gradle, components/feature/webauthn/build.gradle, components/feature/webcompat-reporter/build.gradle, components/feature/webcompat/build.gradle, components/feature/webnotifications/build.gradle, components/lib/auth/build.gradle, components/lib/crash-sentry-legacy/build.gradle, components/lib/crash-sentry/build.gradle, components/lib/crash/build.gradle, components/lib/dataprotect/build.gradle, components/lib/fetch-httpurlconnection/build.gradle, components/lib/fetch-okhttp/build.gradle, components/lib/jexl/build.gradle, components/lib/publicsuffixlist/build.gradle, components/lib/push-firebase/build.gradle, components/lib/state/build.gradle, components/service/contile/build.gradle, components/service/digitalassetlinks/build.gradle, components/service/firefox-accounts/build.gradle, components/service/glean/build.gradle, components/service/location/build.gradle, components/service/nimbus/build.gradle, components/service/pocket/build.gradle, components/service/sync-autofill/build.gradle, components/service/sync-logins/build.gradle, components/support/android-test/build.gradle, components/support/base/build.gradle, components/support/images/build.gradle, components/support/ktx/build.gradle, components/support/locale/build.gradle, components/support/rusterrors/build.gradle, components/support/rusthttp/build.gradle, components/support/rustlog/build.gradle, components/support/sync-telemetry/build.gradle, components/support/test-appservices/build.gradle, components/support/test-fakes/build.gradle, components/support/test-libstate/build.gradle, components/support/test/build.gradle, components/support/utils/build.gradle, components/support/webextensions/build.gradle, components/tooling/detekt/build.gradle, components/tooling/fetch-tests/build.gradle, components/tooling/glean-gradle-plugin/build.gradle, components/tooling/lint/build.gradle, components/tooling/nimbus-gradle-plugin/build.gradle, components/ui/autocomplete/build.gradle, components/ui/colors/build.gradle, components/ui/fonts/build.gradle, components/ui/icons/build.gradle, components/ui/tabcounter/build.gradle, components/ui/widgets/build.gradle, samples/browser/build.gradle, samples/compose-browser/build.gradle, samples/crash/build.gradle, samples/dataprotect/build.gradle, samples/firefox-accounts/build.gradle, samples/glean/build.gradle, samples/glean/samples-glean-library/build.gradle, samples/sync-logins/build.gradle, samples/sync/build.gradle, samples/toolbar/build.gradle
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Kotlin (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 12/1,994 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageKotlin
largest_source_bytes132,369
source_files_sampled1,994
oversized_source_files12
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,990GitHub stars
98contributors
0commits, last 12 months
1,410days since last push
100releases
3bus factor
1open issues
Maven, PyPI, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 474 ⇿
0Stars
474Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0100200300400500464102018-032022-022026-01
Major 8Minor 0Patch 92

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 01:37 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 16/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 36 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities59 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 109

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 109 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIappdirs1.4.4indirect
PyPIattrs21.4.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2021.10.8indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer2.0.12indirect
PyPIfuture0.18.2indirect
PyPIgiturlparse0.10.0indirect
PyPIidna3.3indirect
PyPIjson-e4.4.3indirect
PyPImozilla-repo-urls0.0.3indirect
PyPImozilla-version1.0.0indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0indirect
PyPIredo2.0.4indirect
PyPIrequests2.27.1indirect
PyPIrequests-unixsocket0.3.0indirect
PyPIslugid2.0.0indirect
PyPItaskcluster-taskgraph3.2.0indirect
PyPItaskcluster-urls13.0.1indirect
PyPIurllib31.26.8indirect
PyPIvoluptuous0.12.2indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport6.0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.8.0indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script2.4.1indirect
RubyGemscoffee-script-source1.11.1indirect
RubyGemscolorator1.1.0indirect
RubyGemscommonmarker0.23.6indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.1.10indirect
RubyGemsdnsruby1.61.9indirect
RubyGemsem-websocket0.5.3indirect
RubyGemsethon0.15.0indirect
RubyGemseventmachine1.2.7indirect
RubyGemsexecjs2.8.1indirect
RubyGemsfaraday2.5.1indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http3.0.0indirect
RubyGemsffi1.15.5indirect
RubyGemsforwardable-extended2.6.0indirect
RubyGemsgemoji3.0.1indirect
RubyGemsgithub-pages227indirect
RubyGemsgithub-pages-health-check1.17.9indirect
RubyGemshtml-pipeline2.14.2indirect
RubyGemshttp_parser.rb0.8.0indirect
RubyGemsi18n0.9.5indirect
RubyGemsjekyll3.9.2indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-avatar0.7.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-coffeescript1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-commonmark1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-commonmark-ghpages0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-default-layout0.1.4indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-feed0.15.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-gist1.5.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-github-metadata2.13.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-include-cache0.2.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-mentions1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-optional-front-matter0.3.2indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-paginate1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-readme-index0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-redirect-from0.16.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-relative-links0.6.1indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-remote-theme0.4.3indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-sass-converter1.5.2indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-seo-tag2.8.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-sitemap1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-swiss1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-architect0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-cayman0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-dinky0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-hacker0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-leap-day0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-merlot0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-midnight0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-minimal0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-modernist0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-primer0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-slate0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-tactile0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-theme-time-machine0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-titles-from-headings0.5.3indirect
RubyGemsjekyll-watch2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsjemoji0.12.0indirect
RubyGemskramdown2.3.2indirect
RubyGemskramdown-parser-gfm1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsliquid4.0.3indirect
RubyGemslisten3.7.1indirect
RubyGemsmercenary0.3.6indirect
RubyGemsminima2.5.1indirect
RubyGemsminitest5.16.2indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.13.9indirect
RubyGemsoctokit4.25.1indirect
RubyGemspathutil0.16.2indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix4.0.7indirect
RubyGemsracc1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrb-fsevent0.11.1indirect
RubyGemsrb-inotify0.10.1indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.2.5indirect
RubyGemsrouge3.26.0indirect
RubyGemsruby2_keywords0.0.5indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip2.3.2indirect
RubyGemssafe_yaml1.0.5indirect
RubyGemssass3.7.4indirect
RubyGemssass-listen4.0.0indirect
RubyGemssawyer0.9.2indirect
RubyGemssimpleidn0.2.1indirect
RubyGemsterminal-table1.8.0indirect
RubyGemsthread_safe0.3.6indirect
RubyGemstyphoeus1.4.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo1.2.10indirect
RubyGemsunf0.1.4indirect
RubyGemsunf_ext0.0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width1.8.0indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.6.0indirect
Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 109 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
activesupport6.0.5.1indirecthigh68.1.2.1
addressable2.8.0indirecthigh12.9.0
certifi2021.10.8indirecthigh62024.7.4
concurrent-ruby1.1.10indirecthigh31.3.7
faraday2.5.1indirecthigh32.14.3
future0.18.2indirecthigh20.18.3
idna3.3indirecthigh43.15
nokogiri1.13.9indirecthigh191.19.4
rexml3.2.5indirecthigh63.3.9
urllib31.26.8indirecthigh162.7.0
commonmarker0.23.6indirectmoderate30.23.10
requests2.27.1indirectmoderate82.33.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.