Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 09:30 UTC

n24q02m / better-telegram-mcp

Telegram for AI agents -- messages, chats, media, and contacts across both bot and full user-account modes.

PythonMIT★ 9 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindMCP serverLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

n24q02m/better-telegram-mcp holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (52/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Nguyen Quang MinhPersonal account
29 followers41 public repossince Jun 2023

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIbetter-telegram-mcp4.17.04,1011240 days agoantigravityclaudecodexcopilotcursormcpmcp-servermodel-context-protocolopencodetelegramtelegram-apitelegram-bot

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence18/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume704 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 20 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year704
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year18

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv4.17.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
14.6/60Stars9 stars
2.5/25Forks3 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars9
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
48.2/80Monthly downloads4,101 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesbetter-telegram-mcp
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads4,101
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 83% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.83
How it's scored
39.6/42Issue resolution94% of issues closed
13.1/30PR acceptance387/888 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs387
open_issues3
closed_issues50
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.943
closed_unmerged_prs501
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
10.6/25Owner reach29 followers of n24q02m
18.1/25Track record41 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers29
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginn24q02m
public_repos41
account_age_days1,138
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history124 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbetter-telegram-mcp
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://mcp.n24q02m.com/servers/better-telegram-mcp/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics14 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsclaude, claude-code, cursor, docker, mcp, mcp-server, model-context-protocol, open-source, telegram, ai-agents, ai-coding, python, telegram-bot, telethon
has_wikino
homepagehttps://mcp.n24q02m.com/servers/better-telegram-mcp/
docs_sitehttps://mcp.n24q02m.com/servers/better-telegram-mcp/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 20 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes7,005
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap.mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files.mise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePython with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/101 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes56,521
source_files_sampled101
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

9GitHub stars
3contributors
704commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
3open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.8 / 10
6.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 09:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 20 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPImcp>=1.28.1pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.28.1pyproject.toml
PyPItelethon>=1.44.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.13.4,<2.14pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.14.2pyproject.toml
PyPIloguru>=0.7.3pyproject.toml
PyPIn24q02m-mcp-core>=1.20.0b2,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=49.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIstarlette>=1.3.1pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.50.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptg>=0.6.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 264

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 253 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIcryptg0.6.0direct
PyPIcryptography49.0.0direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIloguru0.7.3direct
PyPImcp1.28.1direct
PyPIn24q02m-mcp-core1.20.0b2direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpydantic-settings2.14.2direct
PyPIstarlette1.3.1direct
PyPItelethon1.44.0direct
PyPIuvicorn0.51.0direct
npm@cloudflare/containers0.3.7indirect
npm@cloudflare/kv-asset-handler0.5.0indirect
npm@cloudflare/unenv-preset2.16.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-darwin-641.20260708.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-darwin-arm641.20260708.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-linux-641.20260708.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-linux-arm641.20260708.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workerd-windows-641.20260708.1indirect
npm@cloudflare/workers-types5.20260713.1indirect
npm@cspotcode/source-map-support0.8.1indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@img/colour1.1.0indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm1.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-ppc641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-riscv641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-s390x1.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm0.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-ppc640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-riscv640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-s390x0.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-wasm320.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-ia320.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-x640.34.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.9indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.6indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.139.0indirect
npm@poppinss/colors4.1.6indirect
npm@poppinss/dumper0.6.5indirect
npm@poppinss/exception1.2.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@sindresorhus/is7.2.0indirect
npm@speed-highlight/core1.2.17indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.10indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmblake3-wasm2.1.5indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcookie1.1.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmerror-stack-parser-es1.0.5indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.1indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmkleur4.1.5indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmminiflare4.20260708.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmobug2.1.3indirect
npmpath-to-regexp6.3.0indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpostcss8.5.19indirect
npmrolldown1.1.5indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmsharp0.34.5indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color10.2.2indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmundici7.28.0indirect
npmunenv2.0.0-rc.24indirect
npmvite8.1.4indirect
npmvitest4.1.10indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmworkerd1.20260708.1indirect
npmwrangler4.110.0indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
npmyouch4.1.0-beta.10indirect
npmyouch-core0.3.3indirect
PyPIaiofile3.11.1indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIauthlib1.7.2indirect
PyPIbeartype0.22.9indirect
PyPIbetter-telegram-mcp4.16.0indirect
PyPIcachetools7.1.4indirect
PyPIcaio0.9.25indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.1indirect
PyPIcyclopts4.21.0indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.18.0indirect
PyPIemail-validator2.3.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfastmcp3.4.4indirect
PyPIfastmcp-slim3.4.4indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.7indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.1.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.3indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.5.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjoserfc1.7.3indirect
PyPIjsonref1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-path0.5.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIopenapi-pydantic0.5.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.43.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpathable0.6.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.0indirect
PyPIpy-key-value-aio0.4.5indirect
PyPIpyaes1.6.1indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0indirect
PyPIpyperclip1.11.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.4.4indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrich-rst2.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIrsa4.9.1indirect
PyPIruff0.15.21indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.4.5indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPIty0.0.59indirect
PyPItyper0.26.8indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIuncalled-for0.3.2indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.6.1indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.2.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.1indirect
PyPIwin32-setctime1.2.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.