Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 10:45 UTC

shcherbak-ai / contextgem

ContextGem: Effortless LLM extraction from documents

Python · Jupyter NotebookApache-2.0★ 2,003 stars⑂ 186 forkssince Oct 2024View on GitHub ↗

shcherbak-ai/contextgem holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (88/100) and lowest on Security (48/100). It was last updated 37 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Shcherbak AIOrganization
30 followers6 public repossince Jun 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 37 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence9/52 weeks with commits
15.1/18Commit volume47 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year47
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push37
active_weeks_last_year9

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases51 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 37 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~26.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count51
latest_release_tagv0.27.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release37
mean_days_between_releases26.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

81Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
53.6/60Stars2,003 stars
18.9/25Forks186 forks
6.7/15Watchers17 watchers
Inputs used
forks186
stars2,003
watchers17
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges27
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io, www.bestpractices.dev
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
53.9/80Monthly downloads11,028 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescontextgem
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads11,028
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 98% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.981
How it's scored
39.6/42Issue resolution94% of issues closed
28.6/30PR acceptance61/64 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs61
open_issues1
closed_issues17
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.944
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
10.7/25Owner reach30 followers of shcherbak-ai
10.7/25Track record6 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers30
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginshcherbak-ai
public_repos6
account_age_days824

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 37 days ago
20/20Version history51 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescontextgem
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish37

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests4 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://contextgem.dev/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics16 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai, contract-analysis, data-extraction, document-intelligence, generative-ai, legaltech, llm, llm-extraction, llm-framework, llm-pipeline, llms, nlp, prompt-engineering, text-analysis, unstructured-data, autoprompting
has_wikino
homepagehttps://contextgem.dev/
docs_sitehttps://contextgem.dev/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests4 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
1.2/2.5CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Passing
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
4/5SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities22 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
9.5/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: pillow 11.3.0 (critical 9.1)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
32.6/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 220 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories36
affected_packages1
assessed_packages67
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the pypi:contextgem@0.27.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 67 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

76Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history97 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.97
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,687
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapdocs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePython without a type-check config
54.2/55Manageable file sizes3/197 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes361,064
source_files_sampled197
oversized_source_files3
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2,003GitHub stars
4contributors
47commits, last 12 months
37days since last push
51releases
1bus factor
1open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 186 ⇿
0Stars
186Forks
50Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

04080120160200186152025-042025-122026-09
Major 0Minor 26Patch 23

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 10:45 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
6CI-Tests4 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
5CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Passing
0Code-ReviewFound 2/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
8SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities22 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIaiolimiter(>=1.2.1,<2.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIcolorlog(>=6.9.0,<7.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIdocstring-parser(>=0.17.0,<1.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIfastjsonschema(>=2.21.2,<3.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIgenai-prices==0.1.2pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2(>=3.1.5,<4.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIlitellm==1.96.2pyproject.toml
PyPIlxml(>=5.4.0,<7.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai==2.54.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpillow(>=11.3.0,<12.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic(>=2.10.6,<3.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-ulid(>=3.0.0,<4.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPItenacity(>=9.1.2,<10.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPItethered(>=0.5.1,<1.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions(>=4.14.1,<5.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIwtpsplit-lite(>=0.2.0,<0.3.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIonnxruntime(<1.24.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIonnxruntime(>=1.24.0)pyproject.toml
All dependencies 168

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 150 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiolimiter1.2.1direct
PyPIcolorlog6.10.1direct
PyPIdocstring-parser0.17.0direct
PyPIfastjsonschema2.21.2direct
PyPIgenai-prices0.0.55direct
PyPIjinja23.1.6direct
PyPIlitellm1.82.2direct
PyPIlxml6.0.2direct
PyPIonnxruntime1.23.2direct
PyPIonnxruntime1.24.3direct
PyPIopenai2.21.0direct
PyPIpillow11.3.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.12.5direct
PyPIpython-ulid3.1.0direct
PyPItenacity9.1.4direct
PyPItethered0.2.0direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0direct
PyPIwtpsplit-lite0.2.0direct
PyPIaccessible-pygments0.0.5indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.13.3indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIalabaster0.7.16indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.12.1indirect
PyPIargcomplete3.6.3indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbandit1.9.4indirect
PyPIbcrypt5.0.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.3indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.2.25indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.6indirect
PyPIclick8.3.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoloredlogs15.0.1indirect
PyPIcommitizen4.13.9indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.4indirect
PyPIcryptography46.0.5indirect
PyPIcssselect1.4.0indirect
PyPIdecli0.6.3indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdeptry0.24.0indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfabric3.2.2indirect
PyPIfastuuid0.14.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.25.2indirect
PyPIflatbuffers25.12.19indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.2.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.4.2indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.7.1indirect
PyPIhumanfriendly10.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.18indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIinterrogate1.7.0indirect
PyPIinvoke2.2.1indirect
PyPIjiter0.13.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImemory-profiler0.61.0indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPInbformat5.10.4indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.2.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.3indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIparamiko4.0.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.4indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.5.1indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.51indirect
PyPIpropcache0.4.1indirect
PyPIprotobuf7.34.0indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIpy1.11.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpydata-sphinx-theme0.15.4indirect
PyPIpydata-sphinx-theme0.16.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpympler1.1indirect
PyPIpynacl1.6.2indirect
PyPIpyreadline33.5.4indirect
PyPIpyright1.1.408indirect
PyPIpytest8.4.2indirect
PyPIpytest-cov6.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-recording0.13.4indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.1.3indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIquestionary2.1.1indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.2.28indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.5indirect
PyPIrequirements-parser0.13.0indirect
PyPIrich14.3.3indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIruff0.15.6indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.0.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.3indirect
PyPIsphinx7.4.7indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild2024.10.3indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild2025.8.25indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints2.3.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-book-theme1.1.4indirect
PyPIsphinx-book-theme1.2.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton0.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-design0.6.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-design0.7.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-last-updated-by-git0.3.8indirect
PyPIsphinx-sitemap2.9.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxext-opengraph0.13.0indirect
PyPIstarlette0.52.1indirect
PyPIstevedore5.7.0indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPItabulate0.10.0indirect
PyPItermcolor3.3.0indirect
PyPItiktoken0.12.0indirect
PyPItokenizers0.22.2indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.14.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.3indirect
PyPItraitlets5.14.3indirect
PyPItyper0.24.1indirect
PyPItypes-html5lib1.1.11.20251117indirect
PyPItypes-lxml2026.2.16indirect
PyPItypes-webencodings0.5.0.20251108indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.41.0indirect
PyPIvcrpy8.1.1indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.2.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.1.1indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.6.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.0indirect
PyPIwrapt2.1.2indirect
PyPIyarl1.23.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing pypi:contextgem@0.27.0 pulls in 67 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
pillow11.3.0directcritical3612.3.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.