Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 12:11 UTC

valory-xyz / open-autonomy

A framework for the creation of autonomous agent services.

PythonApache-2.0★ 130 stars⑂ 45 forkssince Jul 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#aea#autonomy#open-aea#open-autonomy#autonomous-economic-agents#agent-framework#multi-agent-systems#cryptocurrency#agent-services#decentralized-network#ai#ai-agents#olas#valory

valory-xyz/open-autonomy holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (64/100). It was last updated 34 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ValoryOrganization
140 followers154 public repossince Jun 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIopen-autonomy0.21.2913,57114934 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

70Good
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 34 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 827 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year827
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push34
active_weeks_last_year35

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 34 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~14.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.21.29
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release34
mean_days_between_releases14.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

53Moderate
How it's scored
34.2/60Stars — 130 stars
13.7/25Forks — 45 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks45
stars130
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges11
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

84Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

76Good
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 24% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 26 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled26
top_contributor_share0.243

Issue & PR responsiveness

95Exceptional
How it's scored
40.9/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
27.1/30PR acceptance — 1,858/2,058 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs1,858
open_issues12
closed_issues472
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.975
closed_unmerged_prs200
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

69Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
15.5/25Owner reach — 140 followers of valory-xyz
23.7/25Track record — 154 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers140
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginvalory-xyz
public_repos154
account_age_days1,946

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 34 days ago
20/20Version history — 149 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesopen-autonomy
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish34

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.isort]), tox.ini
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://stack.olas.network/open-autonomy/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 14 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaea, autonomy, open-aea, open-autonomy, autonomous-economic-agents, agent-framework, multi-agent-systems, cryptocurrency, agent-services, decentralized-network, ai, ai-agents, olas, valory
has_wikino
homepagehttps://stack.olas.network/open-autonomy/
docs_sitehttps://stack.olas.network/open-autonomy/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

69Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 53 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

73Good
How it's scored
14.3/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: ecdsa 0.19.2 (high 7.4)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
33.8/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,000 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages1
assessed_packages71
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the pypi:open-autonomy@0.21.29 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 71 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md, docs/api/plugins/aea_test_autonomy/base_test_classes/agents.md, docs/api/replay/agent.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://stack.olas.network/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 95 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://stack.olas.network/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.95
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md, docs/api/plugins/aea_test_autonomy/base_test_classes/agents.md, docs/api/replay/agent.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,537

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

87Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, infrastructure/Makefile, packages/valory/connections/abci/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.isort]), tox.ini
11/11Static type checking — autonomy/py.typed, plugins/aea-test-autonomy/aea_test_autonomy/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 59 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespoetry.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, infrastructure/Makefile, packages/valory/connections/abci/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsautonomy/py.typed, plugins/aea-test-autonomy/aea_test_autonomy/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.59
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (autonomy/py.typed, plugins/aea-test-autonomy/aea_test_autonomy/py.typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 6/718 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes150,228
source_files_sampled718
oversized_source_files6

Machine-readable interfaces

50Moderate
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/gogoproto/gogo.proto, packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/tendermint/abci/types.proto, packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/tendermint/crypto/keys.proto, packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/tendermint/crypto/proof.proto, packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/tendermint/types/params.proto, packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/tendermint/types/types.proto, packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/tendermint/types/validator.proto, packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/tendermint/version/types.proto, packages/valory/protocols/abci/abci.proto, packages/valory/protocols/acn_data_share/acn_data_share.proto, packages/valory/protocols/ipfs/ipfs.proto, packages/valory/protocols/tendermint/tendermint.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filespackages/valory/connections/abci/protos/gogoproto/gogo.proto, packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/tendermint/abci/types.proto, packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/tendermint/crypto/keys.proto, packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/tendermint/crypto/proof.proto, packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/tendermint/types/params.proto, packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/tendermint/types/types.proto, packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/tendermint/types/validator.proto, packages/valory/connections/abci/protos/tendermint/version/types.proto, packages/valory/protocols/abci/abci.proto, packages/valory/protocols/acn_data_share/acn_data_share.proto, packages/valory/protocols/ipfs/ipfs.proto, packages/valory/protocols/tendermint/tendermint.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

130GitHub stars
26contributors
827commits, last 12 months
34days since last push
100releases
3bus factor
12open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 45 ⇿
0Stars
45Forks
97Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504422022-062024-072026-07
Major 0Minor 9Patch 71

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10
6.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 12:11 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained15 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities53 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIopen-aea==2.2.9pyproject.toml
PyPIopen-aea-cli-ipfs==2.2.9pyproject.toml
PyPIopen-aea-ledger-ethereum==2.2.9pyproject.toml
PyPIopen-aea-ledger-ethereum-hwi==2.2.9pyproject.toml
PyPIopen-aea-ledger-solana==2.2.9pyproject.toml
PyPIdocker==7.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopen-aea-ledger-cosmos==2.2.9pyproject.toml
PyPIweb3*pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests*pyproject.toml
PyPIgrpcio==1.78.0pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp>=3.8.5,<4.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcertifi*pyproject.toml
PyPImultidict*pyproject.toml
PyPIasn1crypto>=1.4.0,<1.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIecdsa*pyproject.toml
PyPIPyNaCl>=1.6.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpy-ecc>=8,<10pyproject.toml
PyPIprotobuf>=5,<7pyproject.toml
All dependencies 176

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 21 direct and 155 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiohttp3.14.1direct
PyPIasn1crypto1.4.0direct
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17direct
PyPIdocker7.1.0direct
PyPIecdsa0.19.2direct
PyPIgrpcio1.78.0direct
PyPImultidict6.7.1direct
PyPIopen-aea2.2.9direct
PyPIopen-aea-cli-ipfs2.2.9direct
PyPIopen-aea-ledger-cosmos2.2.9direct
PyPIopen-aea-ledger-ethereum2.2.9direct
PyPIopen-aea-ledger-ethereum-hwi2.2.9direct
PyPIopen-aea-ledger-solana2.2.9direct
PyPIprotobuf—direct
PyPIprotobuf5.29.6direct
PyPIpy-ecc8.0.0direct
PyPIpynacl—direct
PyPIpynacl1.6.2direct
PyPIrequests—direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIweb37.16.0direct
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.7.1indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIanchorpy0.20.2indirect
PyPIanchorpy-core0.2.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.1indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackports-asyncio-runner1.2.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs7.0indirect
PyPIbased580.1.1indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIbech321.2.0indirect
PyPIbitarray3.8.2indirect
PyPIblack26.5.1indirect
PyPIblinker1.9.0indirect
PyPIborsh-construct0.1.0indirect
PyPIbs40.0.2indirect
PyPIcachetools7.1.4indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIckzg2.1.7indirect
PyPIclick—indirect
PyPIclick8.3.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIconstruct2.10.68indirect
PyPIconstruct-typing0.5.6indirect
PyPIcosmpy0.11.1indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.0indirect
PyPIcryptography49.0.0indirect
PyPIcytoolz1.1.0indirect
PyPIdatabind4.5.5indirect
PyPIdatabind-core4.5.5indirect
PyPIdatabind-json4.5.5indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdocspec2.2.1indirect
PyPIdocspec-python2.2.2indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.11indirect
PyPIeth-abi5.2.0indirect
PyPIeth-account0.13.7indirect
PyPIeth-hash0.8.0indirect
PyPIeth-keyfile0.8.1indirect
PyPIeth-keys0.7.0indirect
PyPIeth-rlp2.2.0indirect
PyPIeth-typing6.0.0indirect
PyPIeth-utils6.0.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.5indirect
PyPIflask3.1.3indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgitpython3.1.50indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.75.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhexbytes1.3.1indirect
PyPIhidapi0.15.0indirect
PyPIhjson3.1.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.155.7indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIintelhex2.3.0indirect
PyPIitsdangerous2.2.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsonalias0.1.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIledgerwallet0.1.3indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-include0.8.1indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-macros-plugin1.5.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.3indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-monorepo-plugin1.1.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-redirects1.2.2indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInr-date2.1.0indirect
PyPInr-stream1.1.5indirect
PyPInr-util0.8.12indirect
PyPIopen-aea-ci-helpers2.2.9indirect
PyPIopen-aea-dev-helpers2.2.9indirect
PyPIopen-autonomy—indirect
PyPIopen-autonomy0.21.29indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIparsimonious0.10.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpycryptodome3.23.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpydoc-markdown4.8.2indirect
PyPIpydocstyle6.3.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpyheck0.1.5indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions10.21indirect
PyPIpyproject-api1.10.1indirect
PyPIpytest8.4.2indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.4.2indirect
PyPIpython-slugify8.0.4indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpyunormalize17.0.0indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.6.28indirect
PyPIrlp4.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.3indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsolana0.33.0indirect
PyPIsolders0.21.0indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.4indirect
PyPIsumtypes0.1a6indirect
PyPIsuper-collections0.6.2indirect
PyPItabulate0.10.0indirect
PyPItermcolor3.3.0indirect
PyPItext-unidecode1.3indirect
PyPItoml0.10.2indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItomte0.7.0indirect
PyPItoolz0.11.2indirect
PyPItox—indirect
PyPItox4.46.0indirect
PyPItypeapi2.3.0indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.33.0.20260518indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.5.1indirect
PyPIwatchdog—indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets11.0.3indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.8indirect
PyPIwrapt2.2.2indirect
PyPIyapf0.43.0indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.2indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing pypi:open-autonomy@0.21.29 pulls in 71 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
ecdsa0.19.2directhigh2—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with valory-xyz/open-autonomy. Read them side by side →

97strands-agents/harness-sdkBuild an agent harness and control it end-to-end. Open-source SDK for production AI agents in Python & TypeScript - any model, any cloud.Exceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional99google/adk-pythonAn open-source, code-first Python toolkit for building, evaluating, and deploying sophisticated AI agents with flexibility and control.Exceptional98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional94omnigent-ai/omnigentOmnigent is an open-source AI agent framework and meta-harness: orchestrate Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Pi, and custom agents — swap harnesses without rewriting, enforce policies and sandboxing, and collaborate in real time from any device.Exceptional96google/adk-jsAn open-source, code-first Typescript toolkit for building, evaluating, and deploying sophisticated AI agents with flexibility and control.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.