Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 11:08 UTC

wshobson / maverick-mcp

MaverickMCP - Personal Stock Analysis MCP Server

PythonMIT★ 671 stars⑂ 157 forkssince Aug 2025View on GitHub ↗

KindMCP serverCommand-line toolhow this is determined

wshobson/maverick-mcp holds a health index of 91 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (59/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 77 is calibrated to 91 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Seth HobsonPersonal account

2,208 followers34 public repossince Jan 2011UDT | Major 7 Apps

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

87Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
22.8/36	Commit cadence — 33/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 469 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	469
human_commit_share	0.72
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	33

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 2 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~47.5 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	2
latest_release_tag	v1.1.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	8
mean_days_between_releases	47.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

80Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

70Good

How it's scored

45.8/60	Stars — 671 stars
18.3/25	Forks — 157 forks
5.8/15	Watchers — 12 watchers

Inputs used

forks	157
stars	671
watchers	12
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	6
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

30At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 14 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	14
top_contributor_share	0.952

Issue & PR responsiveness

81Excellent

How it's scored

39/42	Issue resolution — 93% of issues closed
27/30	PR acceptance — 213/237 decided PRs merged
10.8/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 5/6 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

merged_prs	213
open_issues	2
closed_issues	26
prs_merged_7d	2
prs_decided_7d	2
prs_merged_30d	22
prs_decided_30d	23
issue_closed_ratio	0.929
closed_unmerged_prs	24
first_time_authors_30d	4
first_time_prs_merged_30d	5
first_time_prs_decided_30d	6

Ownership & stewardship

72Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
24/25	Owner reach — 2,208 followers of wshobson
23.2/25	Track record — 34 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	2,208
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	wshobson
public_repos	34
account_age_days	5,727

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://sethhobson.com
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 20 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	anthropic, claude, finance, financial-analysis, mcp, mcp-server, python, technical-analysis, trading, fastmcp, stock-market, stocks, ai-agents, algorithmic-trading, backtesting, llm, model-context-protocol, quantitative-finance, stock-analysis, yfinance
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://sethhobson.com
docs_site	https://sethhobson.com
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5	Code-Review — Found 5/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
2.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	1
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	227
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 227 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

82Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://sethhobson.com/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 72 of 72 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://sethhobson.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	5,780

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

87Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11	Static type checking — maverick/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 28 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
5/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	maverick/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.28

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (maverick/py.typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/194 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	48,999
source_files_sampled	194
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

33At Risk

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20	MCP server
0/40	Runnable examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	—
has_mcp_signal	yes
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

671GitHub stars

14contributors

469commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

2releases

1bus factor

2open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch pypi package 'maverick-mcp-server' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 157 ⇿

0Stars

157Forks

2Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 1Patch 0

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10

6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 11:07 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3	Code-Review	Found 5/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
5	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 25

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	fastmcp	`>=4.0.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	uvicorn	`>=0.48.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-multipart	`>=0.0.31`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	aiofiles	`>=25.1.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpx	`>=0.28.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-dotenv	`>=1.2.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	anthropic	`>=0.104.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	openai	`>=2.38.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sqlalchemy	`>=2.0.50`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	psycopg2-binary	`>=2.9.12`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	aiosqlite	`>=0.22.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	asyncpg	`>=0.31.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	greenlet	`>=3.5.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	redis	`>=8.0.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	hiredis	`>=3.4.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	msgpack	`>=1.2.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	certifi	`>=2026.5.20`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	numpy	`>=2.2.6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pandas	`>=2.3.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	yfinance	`>=1.4.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	finvizfinance	`>=1.3.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pytz	`>=2026.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	cryptography	`>=50.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	psutil	`>=7.2.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pandas-market-calendars	`>=5.4.0`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 227

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 202 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	aiofiles	`25.1.0`	direct
PyPI	aiosqlite	`0.22.1`	direct
PyPI	anthropic	`1.3.0`	direct
PyPI	asyncpg	`0.31.0`	direct
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	direct
PyPI	cryptography	`50.0.0`	direct
PyPI	fastmcp	`4.0.3`	direct
PyPI	finvizfinance	`1.3.0`	direct
PyPI	greenlet	`3.5.5`	direct
PyPI	hiredis	`3.4.1`	direct
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	direct
PyPI	msgpack	`1.2.2`	direct
PyPI	numpy	`2.5.3`	direct
PyPI	openai	`2.46.0`	direct
PyPI	pandas	`3.0.5`	direct
PyPI	pandas-market-calendars	`5.4.0`	direct
PyPI	psutil	`7.2.2`	direct
PyPI	psycopg2-binary	`2.9.12`	direct
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.2`	direct
PyPI	python-multipart	`0.0.31`	direct
PyPI	pytz	`2026.2`	direct
PyPI	redis	`8.1.0`	direct
PyPI	sqlalchemy	`2.0.50`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.52.4`	direct
PyPI	yfinance	`1.6.0`	direct
PyPI	aiofile	`3.11.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiohappyeyeballs	`2.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.14.3`	indirect
PyPI	aiosignal	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-doc	`0.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	anywidget	`0.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	asttokens	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	authlib	`1.7.2`	indirect
PyPI	bandit	`1.9.4`	indirect
PyPI	beartype	`0.22.9`	indirect
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.14.3`	indirect
PyPI	cachetools	`7.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	caio	`0.9.25`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.7`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	comm	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	contourpy	`1.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	curl-cffi	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	cycler	`0.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	cyclopts	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	dateparser	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	decorator	`5.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	defusedxml	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	dill	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	distro	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	dnspython	`2.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	docker	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	docstring-parser	`0.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	dparse	`0.6.4`	indirect
PyPI	email-validator	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	exa-py	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	exchange-calendars	`4.13.2`	indirect
PyPI	execnet	`2.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	executing	`2.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	fastmcp-slim	`4.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.29.0`	indirect
PyPI	fonttools	`4.63.0`	indirect
PyPI	frozenlist	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	griffelib	`2.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	grimp	`3.15`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore2	`2.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpx-sse	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	httpx2	`2.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpx2-jsfetch	`1.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.19`	indirect
PyPI	imageio	`2.37.3`	indirect
PyPI	import-linter	`2.13`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipython	`9.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipython-pygments-lexers	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	ipywidgets	`8.1.8`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-classes	`3.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-context	`6.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-functools	`4.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	jedi	`0.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	jeepney	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	jiter	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	joblib	`1.5.3`	indirect
PyPI	joserfc	`1.6.8`	indirect
PyPI	jsonpatch	`1.33`	indirect
PyPI	jsonpointer	`3.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	jsonref	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.26.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-path	`0.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`2025.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	jupyterlab-widgets	`3.0.16`	indirect
PyPI	keyring	`25.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	kiwisolver	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	korean-lunar-calendar	`0.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	langchain	`1.3.14`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-anthropic	`1.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-classic	`1.0.7`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-community	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-core	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-openai	`1.3.5`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-protocol	`0.0.18`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-text-splitters	`1.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	langgraph	`1.2.11`	indirect
PyPI	langgraph-checkpoint	`4.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	langgraph-prebuilt	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	langgraph-sdk	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	langsmith	`0.8.18`	indirect
PyPI	llvmlite	`0.49.0`	indirect
PyPI	lxml	`6.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	marshmallow	`4.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib	`3.10.9`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib-inline	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	maverick-mcp-server	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	mcp	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	mcp-types	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	more-itertools	`11.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	multitasking	`0.0.13`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	narwhals	`2.21.2`	indirect
PyPI	nltk	`3.10.3`	indirect
PyPI	numba	`0.67.0`	indirect
PyPI	openapi-pydantic	`0.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-api	`1.42.1`	indirect
PyPI	orjson	`3.11.9`	indirect
PyPI	ormsgpack	`1.12.2`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.2`	indirect
PyPI	parso	`0.8.7`	indirect
PyPI	pathable	`0.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	peewee	`4.0.6`	indirect
PyPI	pexpect	`4.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`12.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.9.6`	indirect
PyPI	plotly	`6.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.52`	indirect
PyPI	propcache	`0.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	protobuf	`7.35.0`	indirect
PyPI	psygnal	`0.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	ptyprocess	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	pure-eval	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	py-key-value-aio	`0.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.4`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.4`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.14.2`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyluach	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyparsing	`3.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyperclip	`1.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-timeout	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-xdist	`3.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32	`311`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32-ctypes	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	referencing	`0.37.0`	indirect
PyPI	regex	`2026.5.9`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	indirect
PyPI	requests-toolbelt	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`15.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rich-rst	`2.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`0.30.0`	indirect
PyPI	ruamel-yaml	`0.19.1`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.16.3`	indirect
PyPI	safety	`3.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	safety-schemas	`0.0.16`	indirect
PyPI	schedule	`1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	scikit-learn	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	scipy	`1.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	secretstorage	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	shellingham	`1.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	sniffio	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.8.4`	indirect
PyPI	sse-starlette	`3.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	stack-data	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	stevedore	`5.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	tenacity	`9.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	testcontainers	`4.14.2`	indirect
PyPI	threadpoolctl	`3.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	tiktoken	`0.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	toolz	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	tqdm	`4.67.3`	indirect
PyPI	traitlets	`5.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	truststore	`0.10.4`	indirect
PyPI	ty	`0.0.73`	indirect
PyPI	typer	`0.25.1`	indirect
PyPI	types-pytz	`2026.2.0.20260518`	indirect
PyPI	types-requests	`2.33.0.20260712`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2026.2`	indirect
PyPI	tzlocal	`5.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	uncalled-for	`0.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	uuid-utils	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	vcrpy	`8.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	vectorbt	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	watchdog	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	watchfiles	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`15.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	widgetsnbextension	`4.0.15`	indirect
PyPI	wrapt	`2.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	xxhash	`3.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`1.24.2`	indirect
PyPI	zstandard	`0.25.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 227 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
nltk	`3.10.3`	indirect	high	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records