公开记录
软件健康报告模式 0.34.0 · 指标 2.10.0 · 2026-09-06 01:58 UTC

FYFran / ironwall

8-step open-source security audit CLI. Secrets, SAST, dependency CVEs, IaC, supply chain. MIT. AI-assisted.

Java · HTMLMIT★ 0 星标⑂ 0 复刻始于 2026年7月在 GitHub 上查看 ↗
类型命令行工具网络服务如何判定
#ai#cli#devsecops#golang#infosec#sast#secret-detection#security-audit#security-scanner

FYFran/ironwall 的健康指数为 100 分中的 36 分，处于「薄弱」区间。 其得分最高的类别是Engineering Quality（70/100），最低的是Sustainability & Governance（10/100）。 最近一次更新在 25 天前。 近期的大部分工作由 1 位贡献者完成。

36
总分 / 100
薄弱

软件健康指数

指标归入加权类别，统一采用 1–100 量表。总体分先取类别加权平均，再依据公开记录的分布进行校准，使各等级具有百分位含义；当公开证据触发高风险司法辖区政策时，评级会按政策调整，并设置 34（存在风险）的上限。

36
卓越93-100公开记录中的最高层级（约前 5%）；基本满足所有检验标准
优秀80-92各方面均表现强劲；仅有少量不足
良好65-79健康；不足之处有限且可控
中等50-64可接受，但存在明显不足；建议进行审查
薄弱35-49多个领域存在实质性薄弱环节
存在风险20-34存在重大薄弱环节；采用时应保持审慎
危急1-19问题严重（项目被弃置、仅有单一维护者、缺乏基本工程规范）
活力社区与采用可持续性与治理工程质量安全AI 就绪度

评分画像

每条轴代表一个类别。形状比平均值更重要——健康的对象会填满整个图形，而“一峰一谷”式画像意味着某一维度的优势正掩盖另一维度的风险。

加权总体分 41 经校准后在公布的指数量表上为 36（记录校准 2026-08-02）。

所有权

FYFran个人账户
0 关注者3 个公开仓库始于 2026年5月

该仓库由个人账户拥有。相较于组织支持的项目，单一所有者项目的延续性风险更高。

按类别列示的指标

活力

项目是否仍有生命——是否仍在编写代码，是否仍在发布版本？

66良好 · 占总体的 21%

开发活跃度

51中等
评分方式
28.8/36推送新近度 — 最近一次推送于 25 天前
4.2/36提交节奏 — 52 周中有 6 周有提交
18/18提交量 — 最近一年 220 次提交
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard：Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
所用输入
commits_last_year220
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push25
active_weeks_last_year6

发布纪律

88优秀
评分方式
16.2/27有发布版本 — 5 个版本标签（无 GitHub 发布版本）
36/36发布时效 — 最近一次发布版本于 55 天前
27/27发布节奏 — 约每 1.5 天发布一次
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard：Signed-Releases — 无数据
所用输入
releases_count5
latest_release_tagv0.7.1
releases_from_tags是
days_since_latest_release55
mean_days_between_releases1.5
已排除计分（无数据或不适用）：OpenSSF Scorecard：Signed-Releases。 其余权重已重新归一化。

社区与采用

项目是否拥有用户、下载量与关注度，并具备欢迎贡献者参与的配置？

33存在风险 · 占总体的 17%

流行度与采用

1危急
评分方式
0/60星标 — 0 个星标
0/25复刻 — 0 个复刻
0/15关注者 — 0 位关注者
所用输入
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

社区健康

70良好
评分方式
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5许可证 — 可识别的许可证（MIT）
18/18CONTRIBUTING 指南
0/13.5行为准则
0/7.2议题模板
0/6.3PR 模板
所用输入
has_readme是
has_license是
readme_badges4
has_contributing是
has_issue_template否
has_code_of_conduct否
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_template否

可持续性与治理

项目能否在其成员之外延续——巴士系数、响应能力、由谁支持，以及软件包的维护状况？

10危急 · 占总体的 23%

维护者韧性（巴士系数）

10危急
评分方式
9/54巴士系数 — 1 位贡献者贡献了半数提交
0/22.5提交分布 — 头号贡献者编写了 100% 的提交
1.4/13.5贡献者广度 — 1 位贡献者
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard：Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
所用输入
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

议题与 PR 响应能力

1危急
评分方式
0/42议题解决 — 没有议题或无数据
0/30PR 接受 — 没有已裁定的拉取请求或无数据
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 30 天内没有首次贡献者的 PR 得到裁决
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard：Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
所用输入
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
已排除计分（无数据或不适用）：议题解决, PR 接受, Newcomer PR acceptance。 其余权重已重新归一化。

所有权与托管责任

19危急
评分方式
10/30所有权背书 — 个人（用户）账户
0/20已验证域名 — 不适用于个人账户
0/25所有者影响力 — FYFran 有 0 位关注者
5/25既往记录 — 3 个公开仓库，账户约 0 年
所用输入
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginFYFran
public_repos3
account_age_days105
已排除计分（无数据或不适用）：已验证域名。 其余权重已重新归一化。

工程质量

基础的工程与文档实践是否到位？

70良好 · 占总体的 19%

工程实践

60中等
评分方式
24/24CI 工作流 — 5 个工作流
24/24存在测试
0/16Linter 配置
0/9.6Pre-commit 钩子
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard：CI-Tests — 无数据
所用输入
has_ci是
has_tests是
has_editorconfig否
has_linter_config否
has_precommit_config否
已排除计分（无数据或不适用）：OpenSSF Scorecard：CI-Tests。 其余权重已重新归一化。

文档

85优秀
评分方式
30/30README
25/25文档目录
0/15文档 / 主页站点
10/10仓库描述
10/10主题标签 — 9 个主题标签
10/10Wiki
所用输入
topicsai, cli, devsecops, golang, infosec, sast, secret-detection, security-audit, security-scanner
has_wiki是
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readme是
has_docs_dir是
has_description是

安全

可见的安全与供应链实践是否稳固，且不存在未解决的高风险司法辖区暴露？

18危急 · 占总体的 16%

安全态势

18危急
评分方式
0/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 无数据
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5许可证 — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — 无数据
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 95 existing vulnerabilities detected
所用输入
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate1.8
已排除计分（无数据或不适用）：CI-Tests, Signed-Releases。 其余权重已重新归一化。

AI 就绪度

该仓库在多大程度上具备与 AI 编码代理协同开发与维护的条件？权重刻意设小（4%）：代理工具链是一项真实的维护信号，但完全不具备的仓库仍可达到 100/100。

67良好 · 占总体的 4%

AI 代理上下文与指引

40薄弱
评分方式
0/45代理指令 — 没有 CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / 编辑器规则
0/15机器可读文档（llms.txt）
40/40可读的提交历史 — 100 次人类提交中有 98 次说明了意图（结构化标题或解释性正文）
所用输入
has_llms_txt否
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

验证循环（构建 / 测试 / 类型检查）

71良好
评分方式
18/18一条命令的引导启动 — Makefile, justfile
22/22自动化测试
0/11Lint / 格式化配置
11/11静态类型检查 — Java（静态类型）
10/10可复现环境 — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10已体现的代理实践 — 最近 100 次提交中有 94 次由代理编写或署名代理
0/8自动化维护 — 未观察到自动依赖更新
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard：Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
所用输入
has_nix否
has_tests是
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfile是
typed_language是
bootstrap_filesMakefile, justfile
has_devcontainer否
has_linter_config否
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.94
toolchain_manifestsbattle_test_candidates/callgraph_target/go.mod, battle_test_candidates/go-vuln-target/go.mod, battle_test_candidates/go_target/go.mod, benchmark/BenchmarkJava-master/pom.xml, benchmark/dataset/testdata/chi_sqli/go.mod, benchmark/dataset/testdata/echo_sqli/go.mod, benchmark/dataset/testdata/fiber_sqli/go.mod, benchmark/dataset/testdata/gin_sqli/go.mod, benchmark/dataset/testdata/mux_sqli/go.mod, benchmark/dataset/testdata/sqli_repro/go.mod, benchmark/dataset/testdata/std_sqli/go.mod, benchmark/owasp_benchmark/pom.xml, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-200/CVE-2024-45388/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2015-10024/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2018-12976/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2019-10152/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2019-11246/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2019-11249/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2020-10696/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2020-11498/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2020-13450/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2020-28348/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2021-20206/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2021-29417/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2021-43813/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2021-46104/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2022-28357/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2022-29804/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2022-31836/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2022-32190/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2022-35919/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2022-40082/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2022-44942/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2022-46959/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2023-49569/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2024-1485/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2024-23652/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-22/CVE-2024-49381/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2017-1000070/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2018-14474/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2018-15178/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2020-11053/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2020-12666/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2020-15129/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2020-15233/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2020-15234/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2020-4037/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2020-5233/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2020-8559/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2021-21291/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2021-29622/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2022-1058/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2022-28923/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2022-29718/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2023-3515/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2023-47168/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-601/CVE-2024-22244/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2018-25046/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2018-25059/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2019-25073/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2020-29529/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2020-36559/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2020-36560/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2020-36561/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2020-36565/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2020-36566/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2020-4053/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2020-7667/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2021-36157/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2021-3762/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2021-3907/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2021-43798/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2022-1992/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2022-1993/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2022-23536/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2022-30427/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2022-30428/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2022-38638/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2022-41920/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2023-27475/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2023-43616/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2023-4782/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2024-10220/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2024-1753/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2024-24579/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2024-25620/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2024-31450/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2024-31457/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2024-45436/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2024-5182/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2024-54132/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2024-54148/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2024-55657/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2024-55947/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2024-56514/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2024-9675/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-73/CVE-2025-24786/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-74/CVE-2020-15184/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-74/CVE-2023-52081/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-77/CVE-2019-13139/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-77/CVE-2023-34105/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-77/CVE-2023-36458/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-77/CVE-2024-34352/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-78/CVE-2022-43758/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-79/CVE-2019-19619/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2015-10023/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2019-15562/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2019-19029/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2019-19499/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2019-3792/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2022-1883/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2022-23857/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2023-30625/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2023-33967/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2023-41891/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2024-22196/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2024-27289/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2024-29031/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2024-35181/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2024-35182/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2024-39909/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-89/CVE-2024-45387/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2019-14255/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2020-13379/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2021-21287/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2021-45325/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2022-24825/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2022-25850/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2022-29180/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2022-29188/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2022-38580/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2023-24623/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2023-3188/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2023-32750/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2023-45822/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2023-5122/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2024-29028/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-918/CVE-2025-24354/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2018-1002101/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2020-26294/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2022-1986/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2022-2024/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2022-4643/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2023-37469/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2023-47105/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2023-49391/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2024-27920/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2024-34713/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2024-41956/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2024-43405/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2024-45258/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2024-52010/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2024-6257/go.mod, benchmark/patcheval_exam/targets/CWE-94/CVE-2025-24366/go.mod, go.mod, test-target-safe/go.mod, test-target/go.mod, testdata/crypto-misuse/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0

面向模型的代码可读性

100卓越
评分方式
45/45可类型检查的代码 — Java（静态类型）
55/55可控的文件大小 — 采样的 6,052 个源文件中有 4 个超过 60KB
所用输入
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes84,380
source_files_sampled6,052
oversized_source_files4

机器可读接口

80优秀
评分方式
40/40API 模式（OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto） — benchmark/BenchmarkJava-master/data/openapi.yaml, benchmark/owasp_benchmark/data/openapi.yaml
0/20MCP 服务器
40/40可运行示例 — examples
所用输入
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signal否
api_schema_filesbenchmark/BenchmarkJava-master/data/openapi.yaml, benchmark/owasp_benchmark/data/openapi.yaml
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

关键数据

0GitHub 星标
1贡献者
220最近 12 个月提交数
25距最近推送天数
5发布版本数
1巴士系数（bus factor）
0开放议题
Go软件包生态系统数

数据采集警告

  • Could not fetch go package 'gitee.com/fyfran/ironwall.git' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

更多细节

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.8 / 10
1.8综合

来自开源项目 OpenSSF Scorecard 的独立、工具无关的安全评估。每项检查奖励的是安全实践本身，而非特定供应商的工具。Scorecard 无法判定的检查项标记为 不适用，并从安全评分中剔除（绝不按零分计）。Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-06 01:58 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
不适用CI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
不适用Signed-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities95 existing vulnerabilities detected
直接依赖 3
注册表软件包版本约束清单文件
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.22battle_test_candidates/go-vuln-target/go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.47battle_test_candidates/go_target/go.mod
全部依赖 未采集

本报告未能采集到解析后的依赖集合：GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

原始 JSON 报告 机器可读

反馈

发现这份报告有不准确之处，或有想法要分享？错误的测量、未识别的工具、建议、疑问——都欢迎提出。每条消息都会被阅读并得到回复。

登录过程中消息不会丢失。

相关记录

与 FYFran/ironwall 共享目录标签或生态系统的已检测仓库。 并排阅读 →

99stackloklabs/toolhiveToolHive is an enterprise-grade platform for running and managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.卓越99stacklok/toolhiveToolHive is an enterprise-grade platform for running and managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.卓越98cli/cliGitHub’s official command line tool卓越98volcano-sh/volcanoA Cloud Native Batch System (Project under CNCF)卓越97onyx-dot-app/onyxOpen Source AI Platform - AI Chat with advanced features that works with every LLM卓越99prowler-cloud/prowlerProwler is the world’s most widely used open-source cloud security platform that automates security and compliance across any cloud environment.卓越

评分是信号，而非担保。 评分反映的是 GitHub 上公开可见的实践——不是代码审计，也不是安全保证。

缺失数据将被剔除并重新归一化权重，绝不按零分计。方法论已版本化并公开：指标 v2.10.0、模式 v0.34.0—— 完整方法论 · 指标知识库.

单项结果在整体记录中的位置： 汇总统计.