Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 09:12 UTC

biowasm / aioli

Framework for building fast genomics web tools with WebAssembly and WebWorkers

JavaScriptMIT★ 121 stars⑂ 14 forkssince Oct 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

biowasm/aioli holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (65/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (39/100). It was last updated 13 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

biowasmOrganization · verified domain
14 followers2 public repossince Mar 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@biowasm/aioli3.2.37,7682756 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

57Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 13 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence2/52 weeks with commits
5.4/18Commit volume3 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained3 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year3
human_commit_share0.94
days_since_last_push13
active_weeks_last_year2
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases22 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 56 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~199.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tagv3.2.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release56
mean_days_between_releases199.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
33.7/60Stars121 stars
9.3/25Forks14 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks14
stars121
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
51.9/80Monthly downloads7,768 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@biowasm/aioli
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads7,768
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 96% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.958
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
17.4/30PR acceptance29/50 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 5/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs29
open_issues0
closed_issues21
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs21
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
8.5/25Owner reach14 followers of biowasm
15.5/25Track record2 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers14
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginbiowasm
public_repos2
account_age_days2,366

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 56 days ago
20/20Version history27 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@biowasm/aioli
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish56

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

49Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgenomics, webapp, webworkers, webassembly, wasm, javascript, bioinformatics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
4.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-ReviewFound 5/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
2.2/7.5Maintained3 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages2
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@biowasm/aioli@3.2.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 2 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
7.9/40Legible commit history14 of 94 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.149
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance6 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.06
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
39.3/55Manageable file sizes4/14 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes171,912
source_files_sampled14
oversized_source_files4
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

121GitHub stars
4contributors
3commits, last 12 months
13days since last push
22releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 14 ⇿
0Stars
14Forks
21Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151412018-112022-072026-03
Major 3Minor 11Patch 7

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 09:12 UTC

6Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 5/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
3Maintained3 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmcomlink^4.3.1package.json
npmwasm-feature-detect^1.2.11package.json
All dependencies 211

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 209 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmcomlink4.3.1direct
npmwasm-feature-detect1.2.11direct
npm@cypress/request4.0.1indirect
npm@cypress/xvfb1.2.4indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.147.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@types/sinonjs__fake-timers8.1.1indirect
npm@types/sizzle2.3.3indirect
npm@types/tmp0.2.6indirect
npmansi-escapes7.3.0indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.3indirect
npmarch3.0.0indirect
npmasn10.2.6indirect
npmassert-plus1.0.0indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmat-least-node1.0.0indirect
npmaws-sign20.7.0indirect
npmaws41.13.2indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbcrypt-pbkdf1.0.2indirect
npmblob-util2.0.2indirect
npmbluebird3.7.2indirect
npmbuffer5.7.1indirect
npmcachedir2.4.0indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmcaseless0.12.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.1indirect
npmchrome-remote-interface0.33.3indirect
npmci-info4.4.0indirect
npmcli-cursor5.0.0indirect
npmcli-table30.6.1indirect
npmcli-truncate5.2.0indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcolorette2.0.20indirect
npmcolors1.4.0indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmcommander2.11.0indirect
npmcommander6.2.1indirect
npmcommon-tags1.8.0indirect
npmcore-util-is1.0.2indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmcypress15.21.1indirect
npmdashdash1.14.1indirect
npmdayjs1.10.6indirect
npmdebug3.2.7indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmecc-jsbn0.1.2indirect
npmemoji-regex10.6.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmend-of-stream1.4.4indirect
npmenvironment1.1.0indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmes-set-tostringtag2.1.0indirect
npmeventemitter26.4.7indirect
npmeventemitter35.0.4indirect
npmexeca4.1.0indirect
npmexecutable4.1.1indirect
npmextend3.0.2indirect
npmextsprintf1.3.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmforever-agent0.6.1indirect
npmform-data4.0.6indirect
npmfs-extra9.1.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.6.0indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmget-stream5.2.0indirect
npmgetpass0.1.7indirect
npmglobal-dirs3.0.0indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.6indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasha5.2.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhttp-signature1.4.0indirect
npmhuman-signals1.1.1indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npmini2.0.0indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point5.1.0indirect
npmis-installed-globally0.4.0indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmis-stream2.0.0indirect
npmis-typedarray1.0.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmisstream0.1.2indirect
npmjsbn0.1.1indirect
npmjson-schema0.4.0indirect
npmjson-stringify-safe5.0.1indirect
npmjsonfile6.1.0indirect
npmjsprim2.0.2indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlistr29.0.5indirect
npmlodash4.18.1indirect
npmlodash.once4.1.1indirect
npmlog-symbols4.1.0indirect
npmlog-update6.1.0indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmerge-stream2.0.0indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmmimic-fn2.1.0indirect
npmmimic-function5.0.1indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmnpm-run-path4.0.1indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmonetime5.1.2indirect
npmonetime7.0.0indirect
npmospath1.2.2indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpend1.2.0indirect
npmperformance-now2.1.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmpify2.3.0indirect
npmpostcss8.5.26indirect
npmpretty-bytes5.6.0indirect
npmprocess0.11.10indirect
npmproxy-from-env1.0.0indirect
npmpump3.0.0indirect
npmqs6.16.0indirect
npmrequest-progress3.0.0indirect
npmrestore-cursor5.1.0indirect
npmrfdc1.4.1indirect
npmrolldown1.2.6indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmside-channel1.1.1indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmsignal-exit3.0.3indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmslice-ansi7.1.2indirect
npmslice-ansi8.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsshpk1.18.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width7.2.0indirect
npmstring-width8.2.2indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmstrip-final-newline2.0.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmsysteminformation5.33.6indirect
npmthrottleit1.0.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtldts6.1.86indirect
npmtldts-core6.1.86indirect
npmtmp0.2.7indirect
npmtough-cookie5.1.2indirect
npmtree-kill1.2.2indirect
npmtunnel-agent0.6.0indirect
npmtweetnacl0.14.5indirect
npmtype-fest0.8.1indirect
npmuniversalify2.0.0indirect
npmuntildify4.0.0indirect
npmverror1.10.0indirect
npmvite8.2.2indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrap-ansi9.0.2indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmws7.5.13indirect
npmyauzl3.4.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@biowasm/aioli@3.2.3 pulls in 2 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.