Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 05:19 UTC

cbcoutinho / nextcloud-mcp-server

Nextcloud MCP Server

PythonAGPL-3.0★ 388 stars⑂ 92 forkssince May 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolMCP serverPluginNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined
#mcp-server#nextcloud#nextcloud-notes#model-context-protocol#nextcloud-deck#rag

cbcoutinho/nextcloud-mcp-server holds a health index of 91 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (100/100) and lowest on Security (57/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

91
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

91
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 77 is calibrated to 91 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Chris CoutinhoPersonal account
132 followers136 public repossince Jun 2015@Astrolabe-Cloud

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPInextcloud-mcp-server0.199.420,0643227 days agonextcloudmcpmodel-context-protocolllmaiclaudewebdavcaldavcarddav

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

100Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 4,339 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year4,339
human_commit_share0.83
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 7 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.199.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release7
mean_days_between_releases1.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

67Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

62Moderate
How it's scored
42/60Stars — 388 stars
16.3/25Forks — 92 forks
3.9/15Watchers — 6 watchers
Inputs used
forks92
stars388
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

72Good
How it's scored
57.4/80Monthly downloads — 20,064 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesnextcloud-mcp-server
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads20,064
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 97% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 30 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled30
top_contributor_share0.972

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good
How it's scored
29/42Issue resolution — 69% of issues closed
28.1/30PR acceptance — 1,319/1,408 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 6/6 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs1,319
open_issues47
closed_issues105
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d23
prs_decided_30d23
issue_closed_ratio0.691
closed_unmerged_prs89
first_time_authors_30d5
first_time_prs_merged_30d6
first_time_prs_decided_30d6

Ownership & stewardship

63Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
15.3/25Owner reach — 132 followers of cbcoutinho
25/25Track record — 136 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers132
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logincbcoutinho
public_repos136
account_age_days4,144
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 7 days ago
20/20Version history — 322 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnextcloud-mcp-server
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish7

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

95Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

92Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/cbcoutinho/nextcloud-mcp-server#readme
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmcp-server, nextcloud, nextcloud-notes, model-context-protocol, nextcloud-deck, rag
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://github.com/cbcoutinho/nextcloud-mcp-server#readme
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 47 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

61Moderate
How it's scored
8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: pillow 11.3.0 (critical 9.1), starlette 0.52.1 (high 7.5)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
28.3/40No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 250 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories46
affected_packages2
assessed_packages104
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 1
direct_affected_packages2
Matched the pypi:nextcloud-mcp-server@0.199.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 104 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 83 of 83 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes34,134

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

63Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 48 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.48
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
53.5/55Manageable file sizes — 17/641 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes150,756
source_files_sampled641
oversized_source_files17

Machine-readable interfaces

60Moderate
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — cookbook
Inputs used
example_dirscookbook
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

388GitHub stars
30contributors
4,339commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
47open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 92 ⇿
0Stars
92Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060801008532025-062026-022026-10
Major 0Minor 45Patch 55

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 05:19 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests10 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 3/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities47 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 31
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPImcp(>=2.1,<3)pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx(>=0.28.1,<0.29.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIanyio>=4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.30pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=42.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlxml>=5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpackaging>=24.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpillow(>=10.3.0,<12.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIicalendar(>=7.3.0,<7.4.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIpythonvcard4>=0.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.11.4pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.1.8pyproject.toml
PyPIcaldav>=3.0.1,<4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrecurring-ical-events>=3.8.0,<4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyjwt>=2.8.0pyproject.toml
PyPIaiosqlite>=0.20.0pyproject.toml
PyPIalembic>=1.14.0pyproject.toml
PyPIauthlib>=1.6.5pyproject.toml
PyPIprometheus-client>=0.21.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-api>=1.28.2pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk>=1.28.2pyproject.toml
PyPIstarlette<1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-asgi>=0.49b2pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-httpx>=0.49b2pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-logging>=0.49b2pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc>=1.28.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-json-logger>=3.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2>=3.1.6pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-text-splitters>=1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdynaconf>=3.2.13,<4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy>=2.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 213

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 31 direct and 182 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiosqlite0.22.1direct
PyPIalembic1.18.5direct
PyPIanyio4.14.2direct
PyPIauthlib1.7.2direct
PyPIcaldav3.2.1direct
PyPIclick8.4.2direct
PyPIcryptography49.0.0direct
PyPIdynaconf3.3.2direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIicalendar7.3.0direct
PyPIjinja23.1.6direct
PyPIlangchain-text-splitters1.1.2direct
PyPIlxml6.1.1direct
PyPImcp2.1.1direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.39.1direct
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc1.39.1direct
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-asgi0.60b1direct
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-httpx0.60b1direct
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-logging0.60b1direct
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk1.39.1direct
PyPIpackaging26.2direct
PyPIpillow11.3.0direct
PyPIprometheus-client0.25.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0direct
PyPIpython-json-logger4.1.0direct
PyPIpythonvcard40.2.0direct
PyPIrecurring-ical-events3.8.2direct
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.51direct
PyPIstarlette0.52.1direct
PyPIuvicorn0.51.0direct
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIargcomplete3.7.0indirect
PyPIasgiref3.12.1indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.2indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIboto31.43.51indirect
PyPIbotocore1.43.51indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcommitizen4.16.5indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.2indirect
PyPIcroniter6.2.4indirect
PyPIdecli0.6.3indirect
PyPIdecorator5.3.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdeptry0.25.1indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIet-xmlfile2.0.0indirect
PyPIeval-type-backport0.4.0indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfastembed0.7.4indirect
PyPIfastembed0.8.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.31.0indirect
PyPIflatbuffers25.12.19indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.4.0indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.75.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.3indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.82.1indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh24.3.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.5.2indirect
PyPIhpack4.2.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpx22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.24.0indirect
PyPIhyperframe6.1.0indirect
PyPIicalendar-searcher1.0.6indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipython9.15.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIjedi0.20.0indirect
PyPIjh25.0.13indirect
PyPIjiter0.16.0indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjoserfc1.7.4indirect
PyPIjsonpatch1.33indirect
PyPIjsonpath-python1.1.6indirect
PyPIjsonpointer3.1.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIlangchain-core1.4.9indirect
PyPIlangchain-protocol0.0.18indirect
PyPIlangsmith0.10.6indirect
PyPIloguru0.7.3indirect
PyPImako1.3.12indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkdownify1.2.3indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.2indirect
PyPImcp-types2.1.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImistralai2.7.0indirect
PyPImmh35.2.1indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6.1indirect
PyPInextcloud-mcp-server0.199.4indirect
PyPIniquests3.20.1indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.5.1indirect
PyPIolefile0.47indirect
PyPIonnxruntime1.27.0indirect
PyPIopenai2.46.0indirect
PyPIopenpyxl3.1.5indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp1.39.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-common1.39.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http1.39.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation0.60b1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-proto1.39.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventions0.60b1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-util-http0.60b1indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.9indirect
PyPIpact-python3.4.0indirect
PyPIpact-python-ffi0.5.4.1indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIplaywright1.61.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIportalocker3.2.0indirect
PyPIprocrastinate3.9.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.51indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.6indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIpsycopg3.3.4indirect
PyPIpsycopg-binary3.3.4indirect
PyPIpsycopg-pool3.3.1indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpy-rust-stemmers0.1.8indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpyee13.0.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpymupdf1.28.2indirect
PyPIpymupdf-layout1.28.2indirect
PyPIpymupdf4llm1.28.2indirect
PyPIpypdfium25.12.1indirect
PyPIpyroscope-io1.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.2indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-base-url2.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpytest-otel2.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-playwright-asyncio0.8.0indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-docx1.2.0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpython-pptx1.0.2indirect
PyPIpython-slugify8.0.4indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIqdrant-client1.18.0indirect
PyPIqh31.9.4indirect
PyPIquestionary2.1.1indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIreportlab5.0.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrequirements-parser0.13.1indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIruff0.15.22indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.19.1indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.4.5indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPItabulate0.10.0indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.4indirect
PyPItermcolor3.3.0indirect
PyPItext-unidecode1.3indirect
PyPItokenizers0.23.1indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItqdm4.69.0indirect
PyPItraitlets5.15.1indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPIty0.0.84indirect
PyPItyper0.27.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIurllib3-future2.23.900indirect
PyPIuuid-utils0.17.0indirect
PyPIwassima2.1.2indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.1.1indirect
PyPIwin32-setctime1.2.0indirect
PyPIwrapt1.17.3indirect
PyPIx-wr-timezone2.0.1indirect
PyPIxlsxwriter3.2.9indirect
PyPIxxhash3.8.1indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.2indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
PyPIzstandard0.25.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

Installing pypi:nextcloud-mcp-server@0.199.4 pulls in 104 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
pillow11.3.0directcritical3612.3.0
starlette0.52.1directhigh101.3.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with cbcoutinho/nextcloud-mcp-server. Read them side by side →

100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional98ModelEngine-Group/nexentNexent is a zero-code platform for auto-generating production-grade AI agents using Harness Engineering principles — unified tools, skills, memory, and orchestration with built-in constraints, feedback loops, and control planes.Exceptional97langgenius/difyBuild Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.Exceptional96PrefectHQ/fastmcp🚀 The fast, Pythonic way to build MCP servers and clients.Exceptional96agentscope-ai/ReMeReMe: Memory Management Kit for Agents - Remember Me, Refine Me.Exceptional96mcp-use/mcp-useThe fullstack MCP framework to develop MCP Apps for ChatGPT / Claude & MCP Servers for AI Agents.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.