Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-06 01:06 UTC

coollabsio / jean

A dev environment for AI agents.

TypeScript · RustApache-2.0★ 1,256 stars⑂ 158 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindDesktop applicationWeb interfaceNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

coollabsio/jean holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on Security (57/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

coolLabsOrganization
1,887 followers44 public repossince Feb 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iojean-corepoints to another repo — not scored0.1.06611374 days agoproteinbiologyrnabioinformaticsdnascience
crates.iojeanpoints to another repo — not scored0.1.0211374 days agoproteinbiologyrnabioinformaticsdnascience

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence33/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,571 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,571
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year33

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases74 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 16 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~4.7 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count74
latest_release_tagv0.1.73
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release16
mean_days_between_releases4.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

71Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
50.3/60Stars1,256 stars
18.3/25Forks158 forks
3.3/15Watchers5 watchers
Inputs used
forks158
stars1,256
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 89% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth44 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled44
top_contributor_share0.892
How it's scored
29.7/42Issue resolution71% of issues closed
23.1/30PR acceptance272/354 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs272
open_issues90
closed_issues216
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d6
issue_closed_ratio0.706
closed_unmerged_prs82
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
23.6/25Owner reach1,887 followers of coollabsio
24/25Track record44 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,887
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logincoollabsio
public_repos44
account_age_days2,404

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://jean.build
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagent, ai, claude-code, worktree, git, parallel
has_wikino
homepagehttps://jean.build
docs_sitehttps://jean.build
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities79 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages39
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:jean@0.1.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 39 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

79Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.cursor/rules/main.mdc, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files.cursor/rules/main.mdc, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes30,325
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapjean-core/Cargo.toml, src-server/Cargo.toml, src-tauri/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.js
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsjean-core/Cargo.toml, src-server/Cargo.toml, src-tauri/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
53.2/55Manageable file sizes35/1,067 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes568,811
source_files_sampled1,067
oversized_source_files35

Key facts

1,256GitHub stars
44contributors
1,571commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
74releases
1bus factor
90open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'jean-core' points at a different repository (https://github.com/dangreco/jean); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'jean' points at a different repository (https://github.com/dangreco/jean); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch crates package 'jean-server' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 158 ⇿
0Stars
158Forks
74Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016015752026-012026-052026-09
Major 0Minor 1Patch 73
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-06 01:06 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities79 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 105
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioserde1jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_yaml0.9jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml0.8jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml_edit0.23jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1.11.1jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1.0jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.8jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iodirs5.0jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell1.20jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioignore0.4jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iozip2.2jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate21.0jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iotar0.4jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioportable-pty0.8jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iowhich7jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaxum0.8jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iotower-http0.6jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioimage0.25jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iozune-core=0.5.1jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioif-addrs0.13jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4jean-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iorust-embed8jean-core/Cargo.toml
npm@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop^1.8.1package.json
npm@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop-hitbox^1.1.0package.json
npm@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop-live-region^1.3.4package.json
npm@pierre/diffs1.3.2package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-alert-dialog^1.1.14package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-checkbox^1.3.2package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-collapsible^1.1.12package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-context-menu^2.2.16package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dialog^1.1.14package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dropdown-menu^2.1.15package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-label^2.1.8package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-popover^1.1.14package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-radio-group^1.3.7package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-select^2.2.5package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-separator^1.1.8package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-slider^1.3.6package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-slot^1.2.4package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-switch^1.2.5package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-toggle^1.1.9package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-toggle-group^1.1.10package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tooltip^1.2.7package.json
npm@tailwindcss/vite^4.1.11package.json
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.83.0package.json
npm@tanstack/react-query-devtools^5.83.0package.json
npm@tauri-apps/api^2.10.1package.json
npm@tauri-apps/plugin-clipboard-manager^2.3.0package.json
npm@tauri-apps/plugin-dialog^2.6.0package.json
npm@tauri-apps/plugin-fs^2.4.1package.json
npm@tauri-apps/plugin-opener^2.4.0package.json
npm@tauri-apps/plugin-process^2.3.0package.json
npm@tauri-apps/plugin-updater^2.10.0package.json
npm@xterm/addon-fit^0.11.0package.json
npm@xterm/addon-web-links^0.12.0package.json
npm@xterm/xterm^6.0.0package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1package.json
npmcmdk^1.1.1package.json
npmdiff^8.0.3package.json
npmfuse.js^7.1.0package.json
npmghostty-web^0.4.0package.json
npmlucide-react^0.552.0package.json
npmreact^19.2.0package.json
npmreact-day-picker^9.8.1package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.0package.json
npmreact-markdown^10.1.0package.json
npmreact-resizable-panels^3.0.4package.json
npmrehype-raw^7.0.0package.json
npmremark-gfm^4.0.1package.json
npmremend^1.0.1package.json
npmshiki^3.23.0package.json
npmsonner^2.0.6package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.3.1package.json
npmtailwindcss^4.1.11package.json
npmzustand^5.0.6package.json
crates.iojean-coresrc-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1src-server/Cargo.toml
crates.iojean-coresrc-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri2src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-opener2src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-window-state2src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-clipboard-manager2src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-dialog2src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-fs2src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-log2src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-notification2src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-persisted-scope2src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-process2src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iodirs5.0src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell1.20src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.ioimage0.25src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.ioarboard3src-tauri/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:jean@0.1.0 pulls in 39 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.