Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 15:26 UTC

trustgraph-ai / trustgraph

The context orchestration layer powered by hypergraphs. Build a unified semantic context layer where agentic outcomes are deterministic and agent behavior is not just traceable, but cryptographically verifiable.

PythonApache-2.0★ 2,689 stars⑂ 317 forkssince Jul 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindMCP serverCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#open-source#ontology#agent#graph#rdf#context#knowledge-graph#owl#explainable-ai#agent-harness#context-graph#context-engineering#context-harness#determinism#graph-engineering#workflow-automation#hypergraph#context-orchestration#help-wanted

trustgraph-ai/trustgraph holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (50/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TrustGraphOrganization · verified domain
68 followers51 public repossince May 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPItrustgraph2.9.43,0485315 days ago
PyPItrustgraph-cli2.9.4-5335 days ago
PyPItrustgraph-mcp2.9.42,0383325 days ago
PyPItrustgraph-ocr2.9.4-4005 days ago
PyPItrustgraph-base2.9.46,8685335 days ago
PyPItrustgraph-flow2.9.43,2185325 days ago
PyPItrustgraph-bedrock2.9.43,7665335 days ago
PyPItrustgraph-docling2.9.41,269295 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

99Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
35.3/36Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 583 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year583
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year51

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.9.4
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases2.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

69Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

84Excellent
How it's scored
55.6/60Stars — 2,689 stars
20.8/25Forks — 317 forks
8/15Watchers — 28 watchers
Inputs used
forks317
stars2,689
watchers28
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

72Good
How it's scored
57.4/80Monthly downloads — 20,207 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestrustgraph, trustgraph-cli, trustgraph-mcp, trustgraph-ocr, trustgraph-base, trustgraph-flow, trustgraph-bedrock, trustgraph-docling
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads20,207
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

40Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 66% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 28 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled28
top_contributor_share0.664

Issue & PR responsiveness

80Excellent
How it's scored
36.5/42Issue resolution — 87% of issues closed
29.4/30PR acceptance — 950/970 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 4/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs950
open_issues16
closed_issues107
prs_merged_7d7
prs_decided_7d7
prs_merged_30d23
prs_decided_30d23
issue_closed_ratio0.87
closed_unmerged_prs20
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d4
first_time_prs_decided_30d4

Ownership & stewardship

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
13.2/25Owner reach — 68 followers of trustgraph-ai
17.2/25Track record — 51 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers68
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logintrustgraph-ai
public_repos51
account_age_days855

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history — 533 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestrustgraph, trustgraph-cli, trustgraph-mcp, trustgraph-ocr, trustgraph-base, trustgraph-flow, trustgraph-bedrock, trustgraph-docling
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://TrustGraph.ai
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 19 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsopen-source, ontology, agent, graph, rdf, context, knowledge-graph, owl, explainable-ai, agent-harness, context-graph, context-engineering, context-harness, determinism, graph-engineering, workflow-automation, hypergraph, context-orchestration, help-wanted
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://TrustGraph.ai
docs_sitehttps://TrustGraph.ai
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

54Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

86Excellent
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
11/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: nltk 3.10.3 (high 7.0)
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages277
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the pypi:trustgraph@2.9.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 277 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://TrustGraph.ai/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 91 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://TrustGraph.ai/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.91
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

40Weak
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/1,020 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes62,493
source_files_sampled1,020
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

60Moderate
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — specs/api/openapi.yaml, specs/websocket/asyncapi.yaml
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filesspecs/api/openapi.yaml, specs/websocket/asyncapi.yaml
interfaces_expected_of—

Key facts

2,689GitHub stars
28contributors
583commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
16open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • pypi download statistics for 'trustgraph-cli' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • pypi download statistics for 'trustgraph-ocr' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • pypi download statistics for 'trustgraph-base' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • pypi download statistics for 'trustgraph-bedrock' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • pypi download figures for trustgraph-base carried forward from the previous scan (stats endpoint unavailable this scan)
  • pypi download figures for trustgraph-bedrock carried forward from the previous scan (stats endpoint unavailable this scan)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 317 ⇿
0Stars
317Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0125250375316302024-082025-082026-09
Major 0Minor 5Patch 95

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-08 15:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 4/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 104
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpulsar-client—trustgraph-base/pyproject.toml
PyPIprometheus-client—trustgraph-base/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests—trustgraph-base/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-logging-loki—trustgraph-base/pyproject.toml
PyPIpika—trustgraph-base/pyproject.toml
PyPIaio-pika—trustgraph-base/pyproject.toml
PyPIconfluent-kafka—trustgraph-base/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiokafka—trustgraph-base/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml—trustgraph-base/pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsockets—trustgraph-base/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-base>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph-bedrock/pyproject.toml
PyPIpulsar-client—trustgraph-bedrock/pyproject.toml
PyPIprometheus-client—trustgraph-bedrock/pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3—trustgraph-bedrock/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-base>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph-cli/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests—trustgraph-cli/pyproject.toml
PyPIpulsar-client—trustgraph-cli/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp—trustgraph-cli/pyproject.toml
PyPIrdflib—trustgraph-cli/pyproject.toml
PyPItabulate—trustgraph-cli/pyproject.toml
PyPImsgpack—trustgraph-cli/pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsockets—trustgraph-cli/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-base>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph-docling/pyproject.toml
PyPIpulsar-client—trustgraph-docling/pyproject.toml
PyPIprometheus-client—trustgraph-docling/pyproject.toml
PyPIdocling—trustgraph-docling/pyproject.toml
PyPIonnxruntime—trustgraph-docling/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-base>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph-embeddings-hf/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-flow>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph-embeddings-hf/pyproject.toml
PyPItorch—trustgraph-embeddings-hf/pyproject.toml
PyPIurllib3—trustgraph-embeddings-hf/pyproject.toml
PyPItransformers—trustgraph-embeddings-hf/pyproject.toml
PyPIsentence-transformers—trustgraph-embeddings-hf/pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain—trustgraph-embeddings-hf/pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-core—trustgraph-embeddings-hf/pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-huggingface—trustgraph-embeddings-hf/pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-community—trustgraph-embeddings-hf/pyproject.toml
PyPIhuggingface-hub—trustgraph-embeddings-hf/pyproject.toml
PyPIpulsar-client—trustgraph-embeddings-hf/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml—trustgraph-embeddings-hf/pyproject.toml
PyPIprometheus-client—trustgraph-embeddings-hf/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-base>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIanthropic—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIscylla-driver—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIcohere—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIfaiss-cpu—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIfalkordb—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastembed—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIflashrank—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIibis—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIjsonschema—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-community—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-core—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIlangchain-text-splitters—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=1.8,<3trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIminio—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPImistralai<2.0.0trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIneo4j—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPInltk>=3.10.2trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIollama—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIpinecone—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIprometheus-client—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIpulsar-client—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIpymilvus—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIpypdf—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIqdrant-client—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIrdflib—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIstrawberry-graphql—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPItabulate—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPItiktoken—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPIurllib3—trustgraph-flow/pyproject.toml
PyPImcp—trustgraph-mcp/pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsockets—trustgraph-mcp/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-base—trustgraph-mcp/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-base>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph-ocr/pyproject.toml
PyPIpulsar-client—trustgraph-ocr/pyproject.toml
PyPIprometheus-client—trustgraph-ocr/pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3—trustgraph-ocr/pyproject.toml
PyPIpdf2image—trustgraph-ocr/pyproject.toml
PyPIpytesseract—trustgraph-ocr/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-base>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph-unstructured/pyproject.toml
PyPIpulsar-client—trustgraph-unstructured/pyproject.toml
PyPIprometheus-client—trustgraph-unstructured/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-magic—trustgraph-unstructured/pyproject.toml
PyPIunstructured—trustgraph-unstructured/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-base>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph-vertexai/pyproject.toml
PyPIpulsar-client—trustgraph-vertexai/pyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-genai—trustgraph-vertexai/pyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-api-core—trustgraph-vertexai/pyproject.toml
PyPIprometheus-client—trustgraph-vertexai/pyproject.toml
PyPIanthropic—trustgraph-vertexai/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-base>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-bedrock>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-cli>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-embeddings-hf>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-flow>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-unstructured>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph/pyproject.toml
PyPItrustgraph-vertexai>=2.9,<2.10trustgraph/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 42

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 33 direct and 9 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIanthropic—direct
PyPIboto3—direct
PyPIgoogle-api-core—direct
PyPIhuggingface-hub—direct
PyPIlangchain—direct
PyPIlangchain-community—direct
PyPIlangchain-core—direct
PyPIlangchain-huggingface—direct
PyPIlangchain-text-splitters—direct
PyPImcp—direct
PyPImistralai—direct
PyPInltk—direct
PyPIollama—direct
PyPIprometheus-client—direct
PyPIpulsar-client—direct
PyPIpymilvus—direct
PyPIpypdf—direct
PyPIpython-logging-loki—direct
PyPIpyyaml—direct
PyPIrdflib—direct
PyPIrequests—direct
PyPIscylla-driver—direct
PyPIsentence-transformers—direct
PyPItorch—direct
PyPItransformers—direct
PyPItrustgraph-base—direct
PyPItrustgraph-bedrock—direct
PyPItrustgraph-cli—direct
PyPItrustgraph-embeddings-hf—direct
PyPItrustgraph-flow—direct
PyPItrustgraph-unstructured—direct
PyPItrustgraph-vertexai—direct
PyPIurllib3—direct
npm@trustgraph/client^1.7.2indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth—indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-aiplatform—indirect
PyPIpyarrow—indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio—indirect
PyPIpytest-cov—indirect
PyPIpytest-mock—indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing pypi:trustgraph@2.9.4 pulls in 277 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
nltk3.10.3indirecthigh1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with trustgraph-ai/trustgraph. Read them side by side →

98topoteretes/cogneeCognee is the open-source AI memory platform for agents. Give your AI agents persistent long-term memory across sessions with a self-hosted knowledge graph engine.Exceptional99ag2ai/ag2AG2 (formerly AutoGen): The Open-Source AgentOS.Join us at: https://discord.gg/sNGSwQME3xExceptional98linkml/linkmlLinked Open Data Modeling LanguageExceptional98Agenta-AI/agentaAgenta is a workspace where you and your team build agents and automations.Exceptional96agentscope-ai/QwenPawYour Personal AI Assistant; easy to install, deploy on your own machine or on the cloud; supports multiple chat apps with easily extensible capabilities.Exceptional96Canner/WrenAIGenBI (Generative BI) for AI agents, an open-source, governed text-to-SQL through an open context layer that turns natural-language questions into trusted dashboards, charts, and SQL across 20+ data sources, such as BigQuery, Snowflake, PostgreSQL, ClickHouse, Amazon Redshift, Databricks and more.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.