Public recordWeak
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 13:09 UTC
wg-lux / endoreg-db
endoreg-db
wg-lux/endoreg-db holds a health index of 48 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (66/100) and lowest on Security (6/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
48
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
48
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
AG-LuxOrganization
6 followers37 public repossince May 2023
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | endoreg-db | 1.0.22.0 | 5,260 | 344 | 2 days ago |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
62
Development activity
68Good
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 2 days ago |
| 7.6/36 | Commit cadence — 11/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 196 commits in the last year |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 196 |
| human_commit_share | 0.99 |
| days_since_last_push | 2 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 11 |
Release discipline
52Moderate
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 1 releases published |
| 7.2/36 | Release recency — latest release 388 days ago |
| 12.6/27 | Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release) |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 1 |
| latest_release_tag | prototype-release |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 388 |
| mean_days_between_releases | — |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
33
Popularity & adoption
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/60 | Stars — 0 stars |
| 0/25 | Forks — 1 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 2 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 1 |
| stars | 0 |
| watchers | 2 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (GPL-3.0) |
| 0/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 0 |
| has_contributing | no |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Ecosystem adoption (downloads)
62Moderate
How it's scored
| 49.6/80 | Monthly downloads — 5,260 downloads/month across pypi |
| 0/20 | Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem |
Inputs used
| packages | endoreg-db |
| dependents | — |
| ecosystems | pypi |
| total_downloads | — |
| monthly_downloads | 5,260 |
| unverified_packages_excluded | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
63
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
28At Risk
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 10.6/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 53% of commits |
| 5.4/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 4 contributors |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 4 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.527 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
86Excellent
How it's scored
| 37.3/42 | Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed |
| 24.4/30 | PR acceptance — 92/113 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 92 |
| open_issues | 22 |
| closed_issues | 174 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.888 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 21 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
54Moderate
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain |
| 6.1/25 | Owner reach — 6 followers of wg-lux |
| 18/25 | Track record — 37 public repos, account ~3 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 6 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | no |
| owner_login | wg-lux |
| public_repos | 37 |
| account_age_days | 1,192 |
Package maintenance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi |
| 35/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 344 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | endoreg-db |
| ecosystems | pypi |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 2 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
66
Engineering practices
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/24 | CI workflows |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — .pylintrc, ruff.toml |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data |
Inputs used
| has_ci | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://info.coloreg.de |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 0/10 | Topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | — |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | — |
| docs_site | https://info.coloreg.de |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
6
Security posture
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/30 | Security policy (SECURITY.md) |
| 0/25 | Dependabot config |
| 0/25 | Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected |
| 0/20 | CodeQL workflow |
Inputs used
| source | file_signals |
| lockfiles | uv.lock |
| manifests | pyproject.toml, requirements-cpu.txt, requirements-gpu.txt |
| has_codeql_workflow | no |
| has_security_policy | no |
| has_dependabot_config | no |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.
Dependency advisories
25At Risk
How it's scored
| 3.1/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 8 affected: django 5.1.4 (critical 9.8), pillow 11.0.0 (critical 9.1), torch 2.5.1 (critical 9.8), +5 more |
| 0/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope |
| 15.5/40 | No advisories left outstanding — 7 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 637 days ago |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 268 |
| affected_packages | 15 |
| assessed_packages | 83 |
| unassessed_packages | 49 |
| affected_by_severity | critical 4, high 3, unknown 8 |
| direct_affected_packages | 8 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 83 resolved dependencies against OSV. 49 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
59
Agent context & guidance
52Moderate
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 6.5/40 | Legible commit history — 12 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.121 |
| agent_instruction_files | .github/copilot-instructions.md |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | 5,150 |
How it's scored
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — .pylintrc, ruff.toml |
| 0/11 | Static type checking |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — lockfile |
| 6/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| 0/8 | Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | uv.lock |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | no |
| bootstrap_files | docs/Makefile |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | 0.03 |
| toolchain_manifests | — |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Code legibility for models
55Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config |
| 54.8/55 | Manageable file sizes — 3/729 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Python |
| largest_source_bytes | 374,203 |
| source_files_sampled | 729 |
| oversized_source_files | 3 |
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) |
| 0/20 | MCP server |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | network-service |
Key facts
0GitHub stars
4contributors
196commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
22open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Advisory severity resolved for 120 of 246 advisories (lookup cap); the remainder are reported as unknown severity
- OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (2026/08/22 13:07:31 Warning: PATs stored in env variables GITHUB_AUTH_TOKEN and GITHUB_TOKEN differ. Scorecard will use the former.); skipping Scorecard checks
More detail
Direct dependencies 60
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | agl-report-reader | >=0.4.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | django-bootstrap5 | >=25.2 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | django-cors-headers | >=4.8.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | django-extensions | >=3.2.3 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | django | >=5.2.4 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | djangorestframework | >=3.16.1 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | dotenv | >=0.9.9 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | faker | >=37.6.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | icecream | >=2.1.4 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | numpy | >=2.2.3 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | opencv-python | >=4.11.0.86 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pandas | >=2.2.3 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pillow | >=11.3.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pydantic | >=2.10.6 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pytesseract | >=0.3.13 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pytest | >=8.3.5 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | python-ffmpeg | >=2.0.12 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pytorch-lightning | >=2.5.1 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pyyaml | >=6.0.2 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | regex | >=2024.11.6 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | scikit-learn | >=1.5.2 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | scipy | >=1.16.1 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | sphinx-rtd-theme | >=3.0.2 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | sphinx | >=8.2.3 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | tesseract | >=0.1.3 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | llvmlite | >=0.44.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | tqdm | >=4.67.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | urllib3 | >=2.2.3 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pytest-django | >=4.11.1 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pytest-cov | >=6.1.1 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pytest-env | >=1.1.5 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | openpyxl | >=3.1.5 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pyjwt | >=2.10.1 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | cryptography | >=44.0.2 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | mypy | >=1.16.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | whitenoise | >=6.10.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | requests | >=2.32.3 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | gunicorn | >=23.0.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | django-filter | >=25.1 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | optimum | ==1.26.1 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | torch | ==2.5.1 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | torchaudio | ==2.5.1 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | torchvision | ==0.20.1 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | transformers | ==4.44.2 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | librosa | ==0.11.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | soundfile | ==0.12.1 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | vector-quantize-pytorch | ==1.18.5 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | vocos | ==0.1.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | decord | ==0.6.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | moviepy | ==2.2.1 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | safetensors | >=0.4.5 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | celery | >=5.5.3 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | python-magic | >=0.4.27 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | django-modeltranslation | >=0.19.16 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pip | >=25.2 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | lx-anonymizer | >=0.8.8 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | ruff | >=0.14.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | build | >=1.3.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | flake8 | >=7.3.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | twine | >=6.2.0 | pyproject.toml |
All dependencies 132
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 80 direct and 52 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | agl-report-reader | — | direct |
| PyPI | agl-report-reader | 0.4.0 | direct |
| PyPI | build | — | direct |
| PyPI | celery | — | direct |
| PyPI | cryptography | — | direct |
| PyPI | cryptography | 44.0.0 | direct |
| PyPI | decord | 0.6.0 | direct |
| PyPI | django | — | direct |
| PyPI | django | 5.1.4 | direct |
| PyPI | django-bootstrap5 | — | direct |
| PyPI | django-bootstrap5 | 24.3 | direct |
| PyPI | django-cors-headers | — | direct |
| PyPI | django-extensions | — | direct |
| PyPI | django-filter | — | direct |
| PyPI | django-modeltranslation | — | direct |
| PyPI | djangorestframework | — | direct |
| PyPI | djangorestframework | 3.15.2 | direct |
| PyPI | dotenv | — | direct |
| PyPI | faker | — | direct |
| PyPI | faker | 33.1.0 | direct |
| PyPI | flake8 | — | direct |
| PyPI | gunicorn | — | direct |
| PyPI | icecream | — | direct |
| PyPI | librosa | 0.11.0 | direct |
| PyPI | llvmlite | — | direct |
| PyPI | lx-anonymizer | — | direct |
| PyPI | moviepy | 2.2.1 | direct |
| PyPI | mypy | — | direct |
| PyPI | numpy | — | direct |
| PyPI | numpy | 2.2.1 | direct |
| PyPI | opencv-python | — | direct |
| PyPI | opencv-python | 4.10.0.84 | direct |
| PyPI | openpyxl | — | direct |
| PyPI | optimum | 1.26.1 | direct |
| PyPI | pandas | — | direct |
| PyPI | pandas | 2.2.3 | direct |
| PyPI | pillow | — | direct |
| PyPI | pillow | 11.0.0 | direct |
| PyPI | pip | — | direct |
| PyPI | pydantic | — | direct |
| PyPI | pyjwt | — | direct |
| PyPI | pytesseract | — | direct |
| PyPI | pytesseract | 0.3.13 | direct |
| PyPI | pytest | — | direct |
| PyPI | pytest-cov | — | direct |
| PyPI | pytest-django | — | direct |
| PyPI | pytest-env | — | direct |
| PyPI | python-ffmpeg | — | direct |
| PyPI | python-magic | — | direct |
| PyPI | pytorch-lightning | — | direct |
| PyPI | pytorch-lightning | 2.5.0.post0 | direct |
| PyPI | pyyaml | — | direct |
| PyPI | pyyaml | 6.0.2 | direct |
| PyPI | regex | — | direct |
| PyPI | requests | — | direct |
| PyPI | ruff | — | direct |
| PyPI | ruff | 0.8.6 | direct |
| PyPI | safetensors | — | direct |
| PyPI | scikit-learn | — | direct |
| PyPI | scikit-learn | 1.6.0 | direct |
| PyPI | scipy | — | direct |
| PyPI | scipy | 1.14.1 | direct |
| PyPI | soundfile | 0.12.1 | direct |
| PyPI | sphinx | — | direct |
| PyPI | sphinx-rtd-theme | — | direct |
| PyPI | tesseract | — | direct |
| PyPI | torch | 2.5.1 | direct |
| PyPI | torch | 2.5.1+cu117 | direct |
| PyPI | torchaudio | 2.5.1 | direct |
| PyPI | torchvision | 0.20.1 | direct |
| PyPI | torchvision | 0.20.1+cu117 | direct |
| PyPI | tqdm | — | direct |
| PyPI | tqdm | 4.67.1 | direct |
| PyPI | transformers | 4.44.2 | direct |
| PyPI | twine | — | direct |
| PyPI | urllib3 | — | direct |
| PyPI | urllib3 | 2.3.0 | direct |
| PyPI | vector-quantize-pytorch | 1.18.5 | direct |
| PyPI | vocos | 0.1.0 | direct |
| PyPI | whitenoise | — | direct |
| PyPI | aiohappyeyeballs | 2.4.4 | indirect |
| PyPI | aiohttp | 3.11.11 | indirect |
| PyPI | aiosignal | 1.3.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | asgiref | 3.8.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | attrs | 24.3.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | black | 24.10.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | cffi | 1.17.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | charset-normalizer | 3.4.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | ffmpeg-python | 0.2.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | filelock | 3.16.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | frozenlist | 1.5.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | fsspec | 2024.12.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | future | 1.0.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | gender-guesser | 0.4.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | idna | 3.10 | indirect |
| PyPI | isort | 5.12.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | jinja2 | 3.1.5 | indirect |
| PyPI | joblib | 1.4.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | lightning-utilities | 0.11.9 | indirect |
| PyPI | markupsafe | 3.0.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | mpmath | 1.3.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | multidict | 6.1.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | networkx | 3.4.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | nvidia-cublas-cu12 | 12.4.5.8 | indirect |
| PyPI | nvidia-cuda-cupti-cu12 | 12.4.127 | indirect |
| PyPI | nvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu12 | 12.4.127 | indirect |
| PyPI | nvidia-cuda-runtime-cu12 | 12.4.127 | indirect |
| PyPI | nvidia-cudnn-cu12 | 9.1.0.70 | indirect |
| PyPI | nvidia-cufft-cu12 | 11.2.1.3 | indirect |
| PyPI | nvidia-curand-cu12 | 10.3.5.147 | indirect |
| PyPI | nvidia-cusolver-cu12 | 11.6.1.9 | indirect |
| PyPI | nvidia-cusparse-cu12 | 12.3.1.170 | indirect |
| PyPI | nvidia-nccl-cu12 | 2.21.5 | indirect |
| PyPI | nvidia-nvjitlink-cu12 | 12.4.127 | indirect |
| PyPI | nvidia-nvtx-cu12 | 12.4.127 | indirect |
| PyPI | packaging | 24.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | pdfminer-six | 20231228 | indirect |
| PyPI | pdfplumber | 0.11.4 | indirect |
| PyPI | propcache | 0.2.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | pycparser | 2.22 | indirect |
| PyPI | pypdfium2 | 4.30.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | python-dateutil | 2.9.0.post0 | indirect |
| PyPI | pytz | 2024.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | six | 1.17.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | sqlparse | 0.5.3 | indirect |
| PyPI | sympy | 1.13.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | threadpoolctl | 3.5.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | torchmetrics | 1.6.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | triton | 3.1.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | typing-extensions | 4.12.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | tzdata | 2024.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | yarl | 1.18.3 | indirect |
Dependency advisories 15
This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 83 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 15 carry known advisories, of which 8 are direct. 49 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.
| Package | Version | Relation | Severity | Advisories | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| django | 5.1.4 | direct | critical | 31 | 6.0.8 |
| pillow | 11.0.0 | direct | critical | 34 | 12.3.0 |
| torch | 2.5.1 | direct | critical | 22 | 2.13.0 |
| torch | 2.5.1+cu117 | direct | critical | 22 | 2.13.0 |
| cryptography | 44.0.0 | direct | high | 13 | 50.0.0 |
| pytorch-lightning | 2.5.0.post0 | direct | high | 2 | — |
| transformers | 4.44.2 | direct | high | 42 | 5.5.0 |
| urllib3 | 2.3.0 | direct | unknown | 12 | — |
| aiohttp | 3.11.11 | indirect | unknown | 66 | — |
| black | 24.10.0 | indirect | unknown | 3 | — |
| filelock | 3.16.1 | indirect | unknown | 4 | — |
| idna | 3.10 | indirect | unknown | 2 | — |
| jinja2 | 3.1.5 | indirect | unknown | 2 | — |
| pdfminer-six | 20231228 | indirect | unknown | 4 | — |
| sqlparse | 0.5.3 | indirect | unknown | 9 | — |
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.