Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 17:52 UTC

FPGA-Research / FABulous

An easy-to-use, silicon-proven (e)FPGA generator with an integrated CAD toolchain 🏗️

PythonApache-2.0★ 299 stars⑂ 61 forkssince Aug 2020View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#asic #efpga #fpga #python #verilog #vhdl

FPGA-Research/FABulous holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (61/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

FPGA-ResearchOrganization

79 followers34 public repossince Aug 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
PyPI	FABulous-FPGA	2.2.0	182	8	1 day ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

96Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
31.8/36	Commit cadence — 46/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 351 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	351
human_commit_share	0.59
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	46

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 11 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~46.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	11
latest_release_tag	v2.2.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1
mean_days_between_releases	46.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

62Moderate

How it's scored

40.1/60	Stars — 299 stars
14.8/25	Forks — 61 forks
6.7/15	Watchers — 17 watchers

Inputs used

forks	61
stars	299
watchers	17
growth_state	organic
growth_factor_pct	100

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	5
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	readthedocs.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

38Weak

How it's scored

30.2/80	Monthly downloads — 182 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	FABulous-FPGA
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	182
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

81Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

76Good

How it's scored

36/54	Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 28% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 18 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	3
contributors_sampled	18
top_contributor_share	0.28

Issue & PR responsiveness

84Excellent

How it's scored

32.3/42	Issue resolution — 77% of issues closed
25.4/30	PR acceptance — 569/672 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	569
open_issues	54
closed_issues	179
prs_merged_7d	4
prs_decided_7d	5
prs_merged_30d	8
prs_decided_30d	15
issue_closed_ratio	0.768
closed_unmerged_prs	103
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

67Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
13.7/25	Owner reach — 79 followers of FPGA-Research
23.2/25	Track record — 34 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	79
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	FPGA-Research
public_repos	34
account_age_days	2,209

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20	Version history — 8 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	FABulous-FPGA
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 11 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — ruff.toml
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://fabulous.readthedocs.io/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	asic, efpga, fpga, python, verilog, vhdl
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://fabulous.readthedocs.io/
docs_site	https://fabulous.readthedocs.io/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

67Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	6.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

80Excellent

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
10.6/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: click 8.2.2 (high 7.2)
33.9/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 135 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	1
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	82
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Matched the pypi:FABulous-FPGA@2.2.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 82 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — .cursorrules, .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://fabulous.readthedocs.io/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 59 of 59 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://fabulous.readthedocs.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	.cursorrules, .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	4,148

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

71Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Taskfile.yml, docs/Makefile, fabulous/fabric_files/FABulous_project_template_verilog/Test/Makefile, fabulous/fabric_files/FABulous_project_template_verilog/Test/Taskfile.yml, fabulous/fabric_files/FABulous_project_template_vhdl/Test/Makefile, fabulous/fabric_files/FABulous_project_template_vhdl/Test/Taskfile.yml
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — ruff.toml
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 38 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	yes
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Taskfile.yml, docs/Makefile, fabulous/fabric_files/FABulous_project_template_verilog/Test/Makefile, fabulous/fabric_files/FABulous_project_template_verilog/Test/Taskfile.yml, fabulous/fabric_files/FABulous_project_template_vhdl/Test/Makefile, fabulous/fabric_files/FABulous_project_template_vhdl/Test/Taskfile.yml
has_devcontainer	yes
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.38

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/209 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	59,701
source_files_sampled	209
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

299GitHub stars

18contributors

351commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

11releases

3bus factor

54open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Star history carried forward from 2026-07-11: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 299 stars today.

More detail

Star and fork history 279 ★ / 61 ⇿

279Stars

61Forks

10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-11. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

Major 2Minor 2Patch 1

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10

6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 17:52 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
8	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 21

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	python-dotenv	`>=1.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	loguru	`>=0.7.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests	`>=2.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	cmd2	`>=4.1.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	bitarray	`>=3.10.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic	`>=2.12.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`>=2.10.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	packaging	`>=25.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	typer	`>=0.20.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	FABulous-bit-gen	`>=0.3.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	PyYAML	`>=6.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	librelane	`>=3.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pick	`>=2.4.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pymoo	`>=0.6.1.5`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	numpy	`>=2.5.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	dill	`>=0.4.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	networkx	`>=3.6.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sdf-timing	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	ciel	`>=2.4.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	go-task-bin	`>=3.40.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jinja2	`>=3.1.6`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 182

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 31 direct and 151 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	bitarray	`3.10.0`	direct
PyPI	bitarray	`3.11.0`	direct
PyPI	ciel	`2.6.1`	direct
PyPI	cmd2	`4.1.2`	direct
PyPI	cmd2	`4.2.3`	direct
PyPI	dill	`0.4.1`	direct
PyPI	fabulous-bit-gen	`0.3.1`	direct
PyPI	go-task-bin	`3.52.0`	direct
PyPI	go-task-bin	`3.53.1`	direct
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	direct
PyPI	librelane	`3.0.11`	direct
PyPI	librelane	`3.0.5`	direct
PyPI	loguru	`0.7.3`	direct
PyPI	networkx	`3.6.1`	direct
PyPI	numpy	`2.5.1`	direct
PyPI	numpy	`2.5.2`	direct
PyPI	packaging	`26.2`	direct
PyPI	packaging	`26.3`	direct
PyPI	pick	`2.6.0`	direct
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.4`	direct
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.5`	direct
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.14.2`	direct
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.15.0`	direct
PyPI	pymoo	`0.6.2`	direct
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.2`	direct
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.3`	direct
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	direct
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	direct
PyPI	sdf-timing	`0.0.post136`	direct
PyPI	typer	`0.26.8`	direct
PyPI	typer	`0.27.2`	direct
PyPI	about-time	`4.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	accessible-pygments	`0.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	alabaster	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	alive-progress	`3.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-doc	`0.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.14.1`	indirect
PyPI	arpeggio	`2.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	astroid	`4.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	autograd	`1.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.6.17`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	cfgv	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.8`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	cloup	`3.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	cma	`4.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	cocotb	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	contourpy	`1.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	cycler	`0.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	deprecated	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	deptry	`0.25.1`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	distro	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.22.4`	indirect
PyPI	fabulous-docs	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	fabulous-fasm	`0.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	fasm	`—`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.29.6`	indirect
PyPI	find-libpython	`0.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	fonttools	`4.63.0`	indirect
PyPI	furo	`2025.12.19`	indirect
PyPI	graphemeu	`0.7.2`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	identify	`2.6.19`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.18`	indirect
PyPI	imagesize	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	interrogate	`1.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonpatch	`1.33`	indirect
PyPI	jsonpointer	`3.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	kiwisolver	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	klayout	`0.30.9`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-core	`1.4.8`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-ollama	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	langchain-protocol	`0.0.18`	indirect
PyPI	langsmith	`0.9.8`	indirect
PyPI	latexcodec	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	lln-libparse	`0.56.0`	indirect
PyPI	lxml	`6.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib	`3.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdit-py-plugins	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	moocore	`0.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	myst-parser	`5.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	ollama	`0.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	orjson	`3.11.9`	indirect
PyPI	pcpp	`1.30`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`12.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	ply	`3.11`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`4.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.52`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.53`	indirect
PyPI	psutil	`7.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	py	`1.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	pybtex	`0.26.1`	indirect
PyPI	pybtex-docutils	`1.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.4`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.5`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyjson	`1.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyparsing	`3.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyperclip	`1.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-mock	`3.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-split	`0.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	rapidfuzz	`3.14.5`	indirect
PyPI	requests-toolbelt	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	requirements-parser	`0.13.1`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`15.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rich-argparse	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	roman-numerals	`4.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.16.6`	indirect
PyPI	scipy	`1.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	semver	`3.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	shellingham	`1.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	sniffio	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	snowballstemmer	`3.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.8.4`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`9.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autoapi	`3.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autobuild	`2025.8.25`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autodoc-typehints	`3.13.5`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-basic-ng	`1.0.0b2`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-copybutton	`0.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-design	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-llm	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-markdown-builder	`0.6.10`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-prompt	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-prompt	`1.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-remove-toctrees	`1.0.0.post1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-rtd-theme	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-applehelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-bibtex	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-bibtex	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-devhelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-jsmath	`1.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-mermaid	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-qthelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxext-opengraph	`0.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	tabulate	`0.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	tenacity	`9.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	textx	`4.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	uuid-utils	`0.16.2`	indirect
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.50.2`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	watchfiles	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.8.2`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`16.0`	indirect
PyPI	wheel	`0.47.0`	indirect
PyPI	win32-setctime	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	windows-curses	`2.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	wrapt	`2.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	xxhash	`3.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	yamlcore	`0.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	zstandard	`0.25.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

Installing pypi:FABulous-FPGA@2.2.0 pulls in 82 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
click	`8.2.2`	indirect	high	1	`8.3.3`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records