Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 11:10 UTC

PixelgenTechnologies / pixelator

A command-line tool and library to process and analyze sequencing data from Molecular Pixelation (MPX) and Proximity Network (PNA) assays.

PythonMIT★ 22 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Sep 2023View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#molecular-pixelation #pixelgen-technologies #protein #proteomics #single-cell #single-cell-omics #spatial #proximity-network

PixelgenTechnologies/pixelator holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (100/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (48/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Pixelgen TechnologiesOrganization

26 followers15 public repossince Oct 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	pixelgen-pixelator	0.30.0	169	37	75 days ago	molecular-pixelation protein proteomics single-cell spatial

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

94Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
29.8/36	Commit cadence — 43/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 739 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	739
human_commit_share	0.98
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	43

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 38 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 75 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~27.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	38
latest_release_tag	v0.30.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	75
mean_days_between_releases	27.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

30At Risk

How it's scored

21.4/60	Stars — 22 stars
5.8/25	Forks — 6 forks
2.7/15	Watchers — 4 watchers

Inputs used

forks	6
stars	22
watchers	4
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	5
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

37Weak

How it's scored

29.7/80	Monthly downloads — 169 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	pixelgen-pixelator
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	169
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

64Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 33% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 13 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	13
top_contributor_share	0.334

Issue & PR responsiveness

86Excellent

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
26.7/30	PR acceptance — 444/498 decided PRs merged
6.5/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
10.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 15/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7

Inputs used

merged_prs	444
open_issues	0
closed_issues	1
prs_merged_7d	11
prs_decided_7d	18
prs_merged_30d	24
prs_decided_30d	34
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	54
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	2

Ownership & stewardship

61Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
10.3/25	Owner reach — 26 followers of PixelgenTechnologies
20.8/25	Track record — 15 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	26
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	PixelgenTechnologies
public_repos	15
account_age_days	2,193

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 75 days ago
20/20	Version history — 37 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	pixelgen-pixelator
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	75

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

100Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://pixelgen.com
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 8 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	molecular-pixelation, pixelgen-technologies, protein, proteomics, single-cell, single-cell-omics, spatial, proximity-network
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://pixelgen.com
docs_site	https://pixelgen.com
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5	Code-Review — Found 15/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	83
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:pixelgen-pixelator@0.30.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 83 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

33At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
32.7/40	Legible commit history — 60 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.612
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

79Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Taskfile.yml, docs/Makefile, tests/Taskfile.yml
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 15 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Taskfile.yml, docs/Makefile, tests/Taskfile.yml
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.15
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.02

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/295 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	54,625
source_files_sampled	295
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

22GitHub stars

13contributors

739commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

38releases

2bus factor

0open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿

0Stars

6Forks

36Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 17Patch 19

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10

6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 11:09 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
1	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7	Code-Review	Found 15/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10	Contributors	project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 28

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	click	`<8.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	cutadapt	`>=4.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	xopen	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyfastx	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	yappi	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pandas	`>=2.0.0,<3.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	numpy	`>=2.0.0,<3.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	annoy	`<=1.17.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	xxhash	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	anndata	`>=0.8.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	numba	`>=0.56.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	scanpy	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	typing_extensions	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	scipy	`>=1.11.0,<2.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyarrow	`>=14`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	semver	`>=3.0.0,<4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	ruamel-yaml	`>=0.17.21,<0.18`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic	`>=2.12.4,<3.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	polars	`>=1.0.0,<2.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	importlib-resources	`>=5.12.0,<6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	fsspec	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	plotly	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	graspologic-native	`>=1.2.4,<2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	duckdb	`>=1.4.2,<2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	faiss-cpu	`>=1.10.0,<2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	levenshtein	`>=0.27.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pixelgen-pixelator-core	`>=0.2.0,<0.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests	`>=2.32.5`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 186

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 33 direct and 153 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	anndata	`0.11.4`	direct
PyPI	anndata	`0.12.18`	direct
PyPI	annoy	`1.17.0`	direct
PyPI	click	`8.2.1`	direct
PyPI	cutadapt	`5.2`	direct
PyPI	duckdb	`1.5.4`	direct
PyPI	faiss-cpu	`1.14.3`	direct
PyPI	fsspec	`2026.6.0`	direct
PyPI	graspologic-native	`1.3.1`	direct
PyPI	importlib-resources	`5.13.0`	direct
PyPI	levenshtein	`0.27.3`	direct
PyPI	numba	`0.65.1`	direct
PyPI	numpy	`2.2.6`	direct
PyPI	numpy	`2.4.6`	direct
PyPI	pandas	`2.3.3`	direct
PyPI	pixelgen-pixelator-core	`0.2.0`	direct
PyPI	plotly	`6.8.0`	direct
PyPI	polars	`1.42.1`	direct
PyPI	pyarrow	`24.0.0`	direct
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.4`	direct
PyPI	pyfastx	`2.3.1`	direct
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	direct
PyPI	ruamel-yaml	`0.17.40`	direct
PyPI	scanpy	`1.11.5`	direct
PyPI	scanpy	`1.12.2`	direct
PyPI	scipy	`1.15.3`	direct
PyPI	scipy	`1.17.1`	direct
PyPI	scipy	`1.18.0`	direct
PyPI	semver	`3.0.4`	direct
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	direct
PyPI	xopen	`2.1.0`	direct
PyPI	xxhash	`3.8.0`	direct
PyPI	yappi	`1.7.6`	direct
PyPI	accessible-pygments	`0.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	alabaster	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.14.2`	indirect
PyPI	appnope	`0.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	array-api-compat	`1.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	ast-serialize	`0.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	astroid	`4.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	asttokens	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	backports-zstd	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.6.17`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	cfgv	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.7`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	comm	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	contourpy	`1.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	contourpy	`1.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.14.3`	indirect
PyPI	cycler	`0.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	debugpy	`1.8.21`	indirect
PyPI	decorator	`5.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	dnaio	`1.2.4`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.21.2`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.22.4`	indirect
PyPI	donfig	`0.8.1.post1`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	executing	`2.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	fast-array-utils	`1.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.29.4`	indirect
PyPI	fonttools	`4.63.0`	indirect
PyPI	google-crc32c	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	h5py	`3.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	identify	`2.6.19`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.18`	indirect
PyPI	imagesize	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	invoke	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	ipykernel	`7.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipython	`8.39.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipython	`9.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipython-pygments-lexers	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	isal	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	isort	`8.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	jedi	`0.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	joblib	`1.5.3`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-client	`8.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-core	`5.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	kiwisolver	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	legacy-api-wrap	`1.5`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	line-profiler	`5.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	llvmlite	`0.47.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib	`3.10.9`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib-inline	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	narwhals	`2.23.0`	indirect
PyPI	natsort	`8.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	nest-asyncio2	`1.7.2`	indirect
PyPI	networkx	`3.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	networkx	`3.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	numcodecs	`0.16.5`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.2`	indirect
PyPI	parso	`0.8.7`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	patsy	`1.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	pexpect	`4.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`12.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	polars-runtime-32	`1.42.1`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`4.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.52`	indirect
PyPI	psutil	`7.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	ptyprocess	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	pure-eval	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	py-cpuinfo	`9.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.4`	indirect
PyPI	pydata-sphinx-theme	`0.19.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pynndescent	`0.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyparsing	`3.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-benchmark	`5.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-mock	`3.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-mpl	`0.19.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-snapshot	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-watcher	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytz	`2026.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyzmq	`27.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	rapidfuzz	`3.14.5`	indirect
PyPI	roman-numerals	`4.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	ruamel-yaml-clib	`0.2.15`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.15.20`	indirect
PyPI	scikit-learn	`1.7.2`	indirect
PyPI	scikit-learn	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	scverse-misc	`0.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	scverse-misc	`0.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	seaborn	`0.13.2`	indirect
PyPI	session-info2	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	snowballstemmer	`3.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.9`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`8.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`9.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`9.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autoapi	`3.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autobuild	`2024.10.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autobuild	`2025.8.25`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-click	`6.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-design	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-design	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-applehelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-devhelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-jsmath	`1.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-qthelp	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	stack-data	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	statsmodels	`0.14.6`	indirect
PyPI	threadpoolctl	`3.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	tornado	`6.5.9`	indirect
PyPI	tqdm	`4.68.3`	indirect
PyPI	traitlets	`5.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	types-requests	`2.33.0.20260518`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2026.2`	indirect
PyPI	umap-learn	`0.5.12`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.49.0`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.7.13`	indirect
PyPI	watchdog	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	watchfiles	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.8.2`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`16.0`	indirect
PyPI	zarr	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	zarr	`3.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	zlib-ng	`1.0.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:pixelgen-pixelator@0.30.0 pulls in 83 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records