Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 01:23 UTC

asv-soft / asv-mavlink

Mavlink library for .NET

C#MIT★ 30 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Sep 2022View on GitHub ↗

asv-soft/asv-mavlink holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (78/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated 42 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Asv SoftOrganization · verified domain
62 followers23 public repossince Feb 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetAsv.Mavlink4.3.0-6945 days agomavlinkdronepx4ardupilot

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 42 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume132 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year132
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push42
active_weeks_last_year35
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases35 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 45 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~30.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count35
latest_release_tagv4.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release45
mean_days_between_releases30.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
23.7/60Stars30 stars
5/25Forks5 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars30
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
49/80Total downloads52,226 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesAsv.Mavlink
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads52,226
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 62% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth17 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled17
top_contributor_share0.618
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
27.3/30PR acceptance194/213 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs194
open_issues0
closed_issues11
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs19
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
12.9/25Owner reach62 followers of asv-soft
17.2/25Track record23 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers62
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginasv-soft
public_repos23
account_age_days1,304

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 45 days ago
20/20Version history69 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesAsv.Mavlink
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish45

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests6 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspx4, ardupilot, mavlink, vehicle, linux, windows, arm, mac-osx, uav, payload, vehicles
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
1.8/2.5CI-Tests6 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages23
unassessed_packages7
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 23 resolved dependencies against OSV. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.asv.me/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history90 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.asv.me/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.9
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,914
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/Asv.Mavlink.Shell/Asv.Mavlink.Shell.csproj, src/Asv.Mavlink.Test/Asv.Mavlink.Test.csproj, src/Asv.Mavlink/Asv.Mavlink.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/Asv.Mavlink.Shell/Asv.Mavlink.Shell.csproj, src/Asv.Mavlink.Test/Asv.Mavlink.Test.csproj, src/Asv.Mavlink/Asv.Mavlink.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54/55Manageable file sizes9/511 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes2,637,979
source_files_sampled511
oversized_source_files9

Key facts

30GitHub stars
17contributors
132commits, last 12 months
42days since last push
35releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
30Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345522022-102024-072026-03
Major 1Minor 0Patch 18

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 01:23 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
7CI-Tests6 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 31
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8src/Asv.Mavlink.Shell/Asv.Mavlink.Shell.csproj
NuGetConsoleAppFramework5.7.13src/Asv.Mavlink.Shell/Asv.Mavlink.Shell.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting$(DotNetVersion)src/Asv.Mavlink.Shell/Asv.Mavlink.Shell.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions$(DotNetVersion)src/Asv.Mavlink.Shell/Asv.Mavlink.Shell.csproj
NuGetDotLiquid2.3.197src/Asv.Mavlink.Shell/Asv.Mavlink.Shell.csproj
NuGetDynamicData9.4.31src/Asv.Mavlink.Shell/Asv.Mavlink.Shell.csproj
NuGetGeodesy4.1.0src/Asv.Mavlink.Shell/Asv.Mavlink.Shell.csproj
NuGetSpectre.Console0.55.2src/Asv.Mavlink.Shell/Asv.Mavlink.Shell.csproj
NuGetSpectre.Console.Analyzer1.0.0src/Asv.Mavlink.Shell/Asv.Mavlink.Shell.csproj
NuGetTestableIO.System.IO.Abstractions.Extensions22.0.4src/Asv.Mavlink.Shell/Asv.Mavlink.Shell.csproj
NuGetTestableIO.System.IO.Abstractions.TestingHelpers22.1.1src/Asv.Mavlink.Shell/Asv.Mavlink.Shell.csproj
NuGetTimeProviderExtensions1.0.0src/Asv.Mavlink.Shell/Asv.Mavlink.Shell.csproj
NuGetAsv.XUnit$(AsvCommonVersion)src/Asv.Mavlink.Test/Asv.Mavlink.Test.csproj
NuGetAutoFixture4.18.1src/Asv.Mavlink.Test/Asv.Mavlink.Test.csproj
NuGetDeepEqual5.1.0src/Asv.Mavlink.Test/Asv.Mavlink.Test.csproj
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2025.2.4src/Asv.Mavlink.Test/Asv.Mavlink.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.TimeProvider.Testing10.6.0src/Asv.Mavlink.Test/Asv.Mavlink.Test.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.6.0src/Asv.Mavlink.Test/Asv.Mavlink.Test.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.72src/Asv.Mavlink.Test/Asv.Mavlink.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Abstractions.TestingHelpers22.1.1src/Asv.Mavlink.Test/Asv.Mavlink.Test.csproj
NuGetTimeProviderExtensions1.0.0src/Asv.Mavlink.Test/Asv.Mavlink.Test.csproj
NuGetxunit.v33.2.2src/Asv.Mavlink.Test/Asv.Mavlink.Test.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5src/Asv.Mavlink.Test/Asv.Mavlink.Test.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1src/Asv.Mavlink.Test/Asv.Mavlink.Test.csproj
NuGetAsv.Cfg$(AsvCommonVersion)src/Asv.Mavlink/Asv.Mavlink.csproj
NuGetAsv.Common$(AsvCommonVersion)src/Asv.Mavlink/Asv.Mavlink.csproj
NuGetAsv.IO$(AsvCommonVersion)src/Asv.Mavlink/Asv.Mavlink.csproj
NuGetAsv.Store$(AsvCommonVersion)src/Asv.Mavlink/Asv.Mavlink.csproj
NuGetZLogger2.5.10src/Asv.Mavlink/Asv.Mavlink.csproj
NuGetTestableIO.System.IO.Abstractions22.1.1src/Asv.Mavlink/Asv.Mavlink.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Abstractions22.1.1src/Asv.Mavlink/Asv.Mavlink.csproj
All dependencies 30

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 30 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAsv.Cfgdirect
NuGetAsv.Commondirect
NuGetAsv.IOdirect
NuGetAsv.Storedirect
NuGetAsv.XUnitdirect
NuGetAutoFixture4.18.1direct
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.15.8direct
NuGetConsoleAppFramework5.7.13direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1direct
NuGetDeepEqual5.1.0direct
NuGetDotLiquid2.3.197direct
NuGetDynamicData9.4.31direct
NuGetGeodesy4.1.0direct
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2025.2.4direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hostingdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractionsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.TimeProvider.Testing10.6.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.6.0direct
NuGetMoq4.20.72direct
NuGetSpectre.Console0.55.2direct
NuGetSpectre.Console.Analyzer1.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Abstractions22.1.1direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Abstractions.TestingHelpers22.1.1direct
NuGetTestableIO.System.IO.Abstractions22.1.1direct
NuGetTestableIO.System.IO.Abstractions.Extensions22.0.4direct
NuGetTestableIO.System.IO.Abstractions.TestingHelpers22.1.1direct
NuGetTimeProviderExtensions1.0.0direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5direct
NuGetxunit.v33.2.2direct
NuGetZLogger2.5.10direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 23 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.