Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 13:15 UTC

M4i-Imaging-Mass-Spectrometry / thyra

A modern Python library for converting Mass Spectrometry Imaging (MSI) data into standardized SpatialData/Zarr format, enabling seamless integration with spatial omics analysis workflows.

PythonMIT★ 25 stars⑂ 1 forksince Oct 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

M4i-Imaging-Mass-Spectrometry/thyra holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Security (55/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

8 followers4 public repossince Sep 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 791 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year791
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year35
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv4.5.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases2.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
22.4/60Stars — 25 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars25
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
47.5/80Monthly downloads — 3,640 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesthyra
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,640
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
38.1/42Issue resolution — 91% of issues closed
29/30PR acceptance — 322/333 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs322
open_issues18
closed_issues178
prs_merged_7d48
prs_decided_7d50
prs_merged_30d55
prs_decided_30d58
issue_closed_ratio0.908
closed_unmerged_prs11
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.9/25Owner reach — 8 followers of M4i-Imaging-Mass-Spectrometry
13.3/25Track record — 4 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers8
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginM4i-Imaging-Mass-Spectrometry
public_repos4
account_age_days1,496

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 109 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesthyra
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.black], [tool.isort])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://m4i-imaging-mass-spectrometry.github.io/thyra/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 17 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbioinformatics, bruker, data-conversion, imzml, mass-spectrometry, mass-spectrometry-imaging, msi, omics-data-integration, scientific-computing, spatial-omics, spatialdata, zarr, ecuypers-group, m4i-cuypers-group, ion-mobility, pasef, timstof
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://m4i-imaging-mass-spectrometry.github.io/thyra/
docs_sitehttps://m4i-imaging-mass-spectrometry.github.io/thyra/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
3/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.4

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages1
assessed_packages253
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 253 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 90 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.918
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.black], [tool.isort])
11/11Static type checking — thyra/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsthyra/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (thyra/py.typed)
53.2/55Manageable file sizes — 12/375 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes226,739
source_files_sampled375
oversized_source_files12
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsnotebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

25GitHub stars
1contributors
791commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
18open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:thyra@4.5.1; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 13:15 UTC

4Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIdask>=2026.3.0, <2026.8pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.1, <9pyproject.toml
PyPIdefusedxml>=0.7.1pyproject.toml
PyPIgeopandas>=0.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=2.0.0, <3pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas>=2.0.0, <4pyproject.toml
PyPIpyimzML>=1.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIscipy>=1.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIShapely>=2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIspatialdata>=0.8.0, <0.9pyproject.toml
PyPIome-zarr>=0.16.0, <0.19pyproject.toml
PyPItqdm>=4.50.0pyproject.toml
PyPIzarr>=3.4.0, <3.5pyproject.toml
PyPIimagecodecs>=2024.1.1pyproject.toml
PyPIanndata>=0.13.2, <0.14pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil>=5.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.7, <3pyproject.toml
PyPItifffile>=2026.5.2pyproject.toml
PyPIxarray>=2024.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpillow>=10.1pyproject.toml
All dependencies 253

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 233 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIanndata0.13.2direct
PyPIclick8.4.2direct
PyPIdask2026.7.1direct
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1direct
PyPIgeopandas1.1.4direct
PyPIimagecodecs2026.8.16direct
PyPInumpy2.5.2direct
PyPIome-zarr0.18.0direct
PyPIpandas3.0.5direct
PyPIpillow12.3.0direct
PyPIpsutil7.2.2direct
PyPIpydantic2.12.5direct
PyPIpyimzml1.5.5direct
PyPIscipy1.18.1direct
PyPIshapely2.1.2direct
PyPIspatialdata0.8.0direct
PyPItifffile2026.8.23direct
PyPItqdm4.70.0direct
PyPIxarray2026.7.0direct
PyPIzarr3.4.0direct
PyPIaiobotocore3.9.0indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.7.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3indirect
PyPIaioitertools0.13.0indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIannsel0.1.3indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIappnope1.0.0indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi25.1.0indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi-bindings26.1.0indirect
PyPIarray-api-compat1.15.0indirect
PyPIarrow1.4.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.8.0indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.2indirect
PyPIasync-lru2.3.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs8.0indirect
PyPIbandit1.9.4indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIblack26.5.1indirect
PyPIbleach6.4.0indirect
PyPIbotocore1.43.56indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIcloudpickle3.1.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcolorcet3.2.1indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.4indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdask-image2026.5.0indirect
PyPIdatashader0.19.1indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.21indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdistributed2026.7.1indirect
PyPIdocformatter1.7.8indirect
PyPIdonfig0.8.1.post1indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.22.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.4indirect
PyPIflake87.3.0indirect
PyPIfonttools4.63.0indirect
PyPIfqdn1.5.1indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.7.0indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-crc32c1.8.0indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.2.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh5py3.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIimageio2.37.4indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipykernel6.31.0indirect
PyPIipython9.16.1indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIipywidgets8.1.9indirect
PyPIisoduration20.11.0indirect
PyPIisort8.0.1indirect
PyPIjedi0.20.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjson50.15.0indirect
PyPIjsonpointer3.1.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter1.1.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-builder1.2.2indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-console6.6.3indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-events0.12.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-lsp2.3.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-server2.20.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-server-terminals0.5.4indirect
PyPIjupyterlab4.6.4indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-pygments0.3.0indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-server2.28.0indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-widgets3.0.17indirect
PyPIjupytext1.19.5indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.5.0indirect
PyPIlark1.3.1indirect
PyPIlazy-loader0.5indirect
PyPIlegacy-api-wrap1.5indirect
PyPIlibrt0.15.0indirect
PyPIllvmlite0.49.0indirect
PyPIlocket1.0.0indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.3indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.11.1indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.2indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImistune3.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-autorefs1.4.4indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-jupyter0.26.3indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.7indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocstrings1.0.6indirect
PyPImkdocstrings-python2.0.7indirect
PyPImock5.2.0indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImsgpack1.2.1indirect
PyPImsgspec0.21.1indirect
PyPImultidict6.9.1indirect
PyPImultipledispatch1.0.0indirect
PyPImultiscale-spatial-image2.0.3indirect
PyPImypy2.3.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInarwhals2.25.0indirect
PyPInatsort8.4.0indirect
PyPInbclient0.11.0indirect
PyPInbconvert7.17.1indirect
PyPInbformat5.11.1indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6.1indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInotebook7.6.3indirect
PyPInotebook-shim0.2.4indirect
PyPInumba0.67.0indirect
PyPInumcodecs0.16.5indirect
PyPIome-zarr-models1.7indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpandocfilters1.5.1indirect
PyPIparam2.4.1indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpartd1.4.2indirect
PyPIpathlib-abc0.5.2indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpims0.7indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.4indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpooch1.9.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIprometheus-client0.26.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.53indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIptitprince0.3.1indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyarrow25.0.1indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.14.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpyct0.6.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.15.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-zarr0.10.0indirect
PyPIpydocstyle6.3.0indirect
PyPIpyflakes3.4.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.2indirect
PyPIpyogrio0.13.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpyproj3.7.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.2indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.3indirect
PyPIpython-json-logger4.2.0indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpywinpty3.0.5indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.2.0indirect
PyPIrangehttpserver1.4.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrfc3339-validator0.1.4indirect
PyPIrfc3986-validator0.1.1indirect
PyPIrfc3987-syntax1.1.0indirect
PyPIrich14.3.4indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIs3fs2026.7.0indirect
PyPIscikit-image0.26.0indirect
PyPIscverse-misc0.1.3indirect
PyPIseaborn0.13.2indirect
PyPIsend2trash2.1.0indirect
PyPIsession-info20.4.2indirect
PyPIsetuptools84.0.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIslicerator1.1.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9.2indirect
PyPIspatial-image1.2.3indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIstevedore5.9.1indirect
PyPItblib3.2.2indirect
PyPIterminado0.18.1indirect
PyPIthyra4.5.1indirect
PyPItinycss21.5.1indirect
PyPItoolz1.1.0indirect
PyPItornado6.5.10indirect
PyPItraitlets5.16.1indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260815indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.33.0.20260712indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIuniversal-pathlib0.3.10indirect
PyPIuri-template1.3.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.14.7indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
PyPIwebcolors25.10.0indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.6.1indirect
PyPIwebsocket-client1.9.0indirect
PyPIwheezy-template3.2.5indirect
PyPIwidgetsnbextension4.0.16indirect
PyPIwrapt2.3.0indirect
PyPIxarray-dataclass3.0.0indirect
PyPIxarray-spatial0.10.17indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.5indirect
PyPIzict3.0.0indirect
PyPIzstandard0.25.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 253 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
jupyter-server2.20.0indirecthigh22.21.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.